Toucano
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-16-03 10:36 PM
Original message |
|
the sexiest candidate running?*
Yes, it is shallow, but c'mon! If you consider appearance to be just 20% of the equation, it will be a Clark/Edwards ticket!
*Disclaimer: Not a factor in my consideration. Just a strategic consideration. :hi:
|
RobertSeattle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-16-03 10:39 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I kind of think he looks a little like Hamilton |
JI7
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-16-03 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
take away the hair, just look at the face and you can see it.
|
RichV
(858 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-16-03 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
he's probably even a Federalist! Or something.
|
DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-16-03 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
IranianDemocrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-16-03 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. Jesus Christ you're right! |
TheDonkey
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-16-03 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
7. Hamilton's a good looking guy! |
|
Clark/Edwards ticket definetly would be nice eye candy for sure.
Edwards sounds australlian though... a little creepy. ;)
|
Renew Deal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-16-03 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
8. The feds are on the way. |
|
For scanning cash. :crazy:
|
mitchum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-17-03 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
14. Actually, PNAC shill Bill Kristol looks more like Hamilton |
Carmerian
(203 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-17-03 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
|
...because Hamilton was monarchist scumbag who stole our first Constitution out from under us, and then helped the Federalists in their passive resistance against installing a Bill of Rights for the next constitution. Perfect person to be reincarnated in Bill Kristol.
|
cally
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-16-03 10:44 PM
Response to Original message |
|
If I want to be shallow and I do ;-) Noone can compete with Edwards for attractiveness. IMHO, of course.
|
AlabamaDem
(52 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-16-03 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. uh, Clark is so much hotter than Edwards |
|
Edited on Tue Sep-16-03 11:06 PM by AlabamaDem
I can't believe I just posted that, but it's true! Edwards is just a little pretty boy, that's kind of a turn off.
|
Rowdyboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-16-03 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
10. He definitely looks like a |
|
"bad boy"...I'll bet Edwards has had more fun than the other 9 combined. He just looks mischevious.
|
Toucano
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-16-03 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
is no Rover for sure! He scores extra points for great teeth and the whole youth thing he has going!
But he seems like someone who might need to be taught a thing or two.
Clark, on the other hand, seems fully trained. {insert devilish laugh}
IMHO, of course.
:D
|
AlabamaDem
(52 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-16-03 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
|
you got it, girl (I assume)
|
ForrestGump
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-17-03 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. Are we talking trained in small-unit military penetration here? |
|
:D
Sure, it's superficial, but superficial is how a lot of people are going to vote. Sad, but true. Let's just hope that the dude who wins the nomination is the perfect combination of (a) the right man for the job and (b) an almost certain victor (voter-appeal, in other words) against BonsaiBoy.
|
graham67
(732 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-17-03 12:17 AM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 06th 2024, 11:34 AM
Response to Original message |