Egnever
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-17-03 09:33 AM
Original message |
|
Edited on Wed Sep-17-03 09:33 AM by Egnever
Is it possible that bush Vetoed the UN resolution on the killing of arafat in order to goad the terorists into striking the US so he could get another bump in the polls?
|
Patriot_Spear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-17-03 09:35 AM
Response to Original message |
1. You talk like you think 'Terra-ists' are all one group... |
ikojo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-17-03 09:35 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Oh NO Bush would NEVER do anything |
|
so self serving...never <sarcasm off>
|
Az
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-17-03 09:35 AM
Response to Original message |
|
George and CO simply do not like the idea of anybody telling them what they can and cannot do. The resolution would have tied their hands on what they could do with Arafat. They like the idea that if they wanted to they could kill him.
|
Braden
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-17-03 09:37 AM
Response to Original message |
|
when he could invade a defenseless arab nation and get the same result. I think he was hoping for a quicker solution and maybe for the occasional Iraqi who enjoys the occupation.
|
Egnever
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-17-03 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
but he isnt getting results even from all that and is sinking fast he needs more!
|
Champion Jack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-17-03 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
If he lets another domestic attack happen on his watch he loses.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:27 AM
Response to Original message |