Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does anybody think Charlie Rangel would endorse a war hawk?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 03:16 PM
Original message
Does anybody think Charlie Rangel would endorse a war hawk?
It's getting ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CMT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Rangel is supporting Gen. Clark
who opposed the Iraqi war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ashcroft Kutcher Donating Member (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. I dont think he would speak out against him
in any way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diplomats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Clark is not a war hawk
Are you saying that because he's a retired general? The two are not equivalent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Many on DU would portray Clark
as a military monster. I don't believe Charlie Rangel, among others, would actively endorse somebody like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diplomats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Sorry, Buzzz, I misread your post
I thought you were endorsing the idea that Clark's a war hawk. Next time I'll pay more attention! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Khephra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. Did anyone expect Rangel to push for any sort of a draft?
Edited on Thu Sep-18-03 03:31 PM by khephra
Sometimes people here trust others to do their thinking for them waaaaaaaay too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Charlie Rangel Pushed For A Draft
to highlight the hypocrisy of the chicken hawks* by making their sons and daughters eligible for service...

No, Charlie isn't going to support a war hawk cuz his constituents would be the first ones to be cannon fodder....





*not just the elites but the sons and daughters of all the Americans who were so gung ho about the war...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. That was a "bluff" proposal. Rangel was sending the armchair warriors
an anti-war message. People are less likely to promote "elective" wars if they or thier relatives will be drafted to fight in them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. One must look at his motivations for doing so.
He wants the bluebloods to share equally in the bloodletting which very well may have the practical effect of discouraging the rush to war in general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Khephra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. And my answer to you all is that if you go back
Edited on Thu Sep-18-03 04:00 PM by khephra
and check out the threads on Rangel's draft then you'll see that a lot of us were shocked and disgusted that someone would bluff on an issue like this. We believed that if the GOP had wanted to call his bluff then they could have used him to push for a guilt-free-draft and the Democratic Party would have been to blame.

Lets get one thing clear--I love Rangel and I like Clark. I like anyone who was against Bush's fake war when it was unpopular and possibly treasonous....but, none of us people know Rangel...we don't really know Clark or Dean or any other politician unless we happen to REALLY know them in real life. We should make up our minds based upon our own ablities and not endorsements of others or expectations that people will act in ways that we believe they'll act.

How many of us "Thought" we knew how the Democrats would act against Bush many, many times only to be disappointed in them almost as a whole group?

Think for yourself. Question authority. That's it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. By all means think for yourself.
But don't ignore the opinions of those who may be more knowledgeable than yourself on a given subject and in this case may actually know the subject and his qualities personally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedda_foil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Thank you Khephra.
I am always surprised when Duer trust others to do their thinking for them. I'm always surprised by Duers who accept easy answers to hard questions. I'm always surprised by DUers who trust without verifying.

And for those who want to question my support for Dean, please be assured that I went hammer and tongs into researching his background and record BEFORE even considering supporting him, and I continue to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. Nonsense
if you dont know why Rangel pushed for the draft then you should educate yourself. Setting up a strawman like that is pretty slimy. So to you Rangel is basically a republican? Damn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. Bill, Hillary and Michael Moore adore the General.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. No, I didn't. Disappointed in Rangel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Why
Maybe Wes is a good guy?


good guy- any Dem who can beat *
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Charlie's endorsement is a plus
as far as I'm concerned. Rangel's a oldtime liberal and gen-yew-wine Republican Ass-Chewer, my kind of Dem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Charlie Rangel Is As Old School As They Come....
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
19. Now they slime Rangel
just becasue he endorsed a candidate whose name wasnt Dean. Your right it is getting ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 02:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC