MysticMind
(279 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-19-03 02:35 PM
Original message |
Worldnutdaily says Clark is unpatriotic.... |
|
Is already saying Clark isn't a genuine hero and patriot. They call him a threat to America. http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=34685
|
HFishbine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-19-03 02:38 PM
Response to Original message |
|
that first among the resons Clark would be "worse" than Clinton is that Clark is "better looking," I'd say this guy is off his rocker.
|
WhoCountsTheVotes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-19-03 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
15. They also admit the "Clark almost started WWIII" meme is a lie |
|
rather underhandedly, they admit that the order was given by Clark's boss, Secretary-General Javier Solana - while they whole time they have been portraying Clark as "unstable" as if he decided single-handedly on a whim to take Pristina.
"He nearly started World War III when serving as NATO commander in the unconstitutional, immoral war on Serbia. When the Russians took control of Pristina airport before NATO troops, Clark, at the behest of NATO Secretary-General Javier Solana, ordered 500 British and French paratroopers to take it away from them. Thankfully, his order was disregarded by British Gen. Sir Mike Jackson, who told Clark: "I'm not going to start the Third World War for you."
And this guy Farah is such an egomaniac he thinks he's "one of Clinton's enemies, victims and targets" - oh please, who the hell is this guy anyway?
One thing he brings up does concern me a little: "He is undoubtedly the pick of the globalists like George Soros, currently raising $75 million to pick the next president." - Soros may be a libertarian on social issues, but I don't want the guy interfering in US politics, considering the damage he has done around the world.
The Republicans are very scared of Clark, no doubt about it. At this point I think most of our candidates could beat Bush.
|
kwolf68
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-19-03 02:42 PM
Response to Original message |
|
These people never quit do they? Clark has been on the run for 2 days now and has already taken a major fist from the right flank.
Do these f****** have jobs, or do they just sit around and bash those they don't agree with all day long?
He isn't a "geuine" American patriot? OMFG. Dude has served this nation for what...25 years...has 4 star general and made it through the very demanding West Point #1 in his class. I believe he also cut his teeth in Vietnam.
I guess Clark is same type of tratior Max Cleland and John Kerry were.
|
Don_G
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-19-03 02:43 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Serve your country, retire as General, bright enough to be a Rhodes Scholar and a Democrat?
Yep, he's a threat to National Security.
|
HFishbine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-19-03 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
but it's not to national security that they're worried about.
|
oasis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-19-03 02:47 PM
Response to Original message |
4. The author, Farah, claims he did not vote for Bush. Lyndon La Rouche |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-19-03 02:48 PM by oasis
would be my guess. :think:
|
DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-19-03 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
He wanted to start a petition to have Congress impeach the six Supreme Court Justices who struck down Texas' sodomy laws...
|
kodi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-19-03 02:50 PM
Response to Original message |
6. joe mccarthy went after george marshall too and started his own doom |
|
when those like the reporter with the wdn, who never served call those who did, traitors, we have moved beyond the looking glass into the world of right wing fascist rhetoric.
according to these cretins, there is only one patriotism, theirs, and such attitude should be anathema to all who believe in a plualistic society, and clark seems to.
the wdn jerk-off is no different than the taliban who insist that their world view is the only true one.
|
gratuitous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-19-03 02:54 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Well if anyone would recognize unpatriotic . . . |
|
It'd be the fine lunatics at WND! I understand they don't have mirrors there, just to avoid hearing people screaming "Unpatriotic!!" at their reflections all day long.
|
RobertSeattle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-19-03 02:55 PM
Response to Original message |
9. World Net Daily "Exclusive" Commentary |
|
Cuz no one else would pick up this dribble.
Another "Bwak Bwak Chickenhawk" if I had to guess.
|
Gman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-19-03 02:58 PM
Response to Original message |
10. The truth and facts have never stopped Farah |
|
in his pursuit of slandering.
|
Carmerian
(203 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-19-03 02:59 PM
Response to Original message |
11. That's *Wingnutdaily* |
gristy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-19-03 03:01 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-19-03 03:08 PM by gristy
DO you realize that by posting this link (and the disingenuous comment), MysticMind is actively and purposely spreading the viewpoints expressed in that link and in his posted comment.
Think about it.
|
gratuitous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-19-03 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. Please check the DU rules |
|
You're not supposed to call someone a disruptor or a freeper; if you have a suspicion, hit the alert button and let the mods take care of it.
|
gristy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-19-03 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
|
I did hit alert. I also edited the offending post. But DUers ought to recognize when they are being spun.
|
kaitykaity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-19-03 03:37 PM
Response to Original message |
|
New poster links to conservative web site.
kaitykaity DU Moderator
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:43 PM
Response to Original message |