the leader of the dem party SHOULD be a PARTISAN dem!

[dfong63]

isn't this completely obvious?

think about it folks. remember what Grover Norquist (i think it was him) said, "Bipartisanship is date rape". you know he was telling the truth there. we need a dem in the white house, we need a real dem in the white house, and that means a PARTISAN dem. one who will fight for dem ideals like a motherbear, who will use the presidency to build up the dem party and to gain PARTISAN advantage, just like the repubs have been doing for years. we need a PARTISAN dem, which is exactly what Clark AIN'T.

``Clark, relaxed and chatty, portrayed himself as a different kind of Democrat, one without strong partisan impulses. He said he "probably" voted for Richard M. Nixon in 1972 and backed Ronald Reagan. He did not start considering himself a Democrat until 1992, when he backed fellow Arkansan Bill Clinton.''

see clark probably would have backed war

see also
ex-nato general speaks at repub dinner , and note that Clark was helping the repubs raise funds LONG AFTER his supposed conversion by Bill Clinton.

is this what we want? a nominal "dem" who is so non-partisan that he helps raise funds for the enemy?

WTF???

[pansypoo53219]

1. this is why he ain't top

of my list.