Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

why are some in denial about candidates and waffling?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-03 12:14 PM
Original message
why are some in denial about candidates and waffling?
politicians waffle. :eyes:

they lie, they pander, they choose political expedience over doing the right thing. they make back-room deals and personally enrich themselves. they collaborate and play CYA.

yes, even ________! he did it, too! it's part of the job description if they wanna run with the big dogs.

to expect anything else is, unfortunately, dellusional. politicain have played this game for centuries.

(and yes, there are exceptions. but their integrity is a hindrance if they aspire to play in the big leagues.)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-03 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Because some are fanatical
Edited on Sat Sep-20-03 12:30 PM by quinnox
about the candidate they have chosen. They don't want to think their candidate has ever made a flip-flop or mistake, so they either deny it or pretend it doesn't exist.

It's psychology. The same reason it's rare to see a person admit they made an error. How many times on DU for example when confronted with undisputable proof that they were wrong, do you see someone admit it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quilp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-03 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. It is a lack of maturity.
All politicians have to make compromises. They have to shake hands and smile at people they detest. It as often takes a lot of courage to do this than people give credit for. These people are serving politics not philosophy. All you can really do is look at their record as politicians.

For example, Ted Kennedy could have been a playboy. Or a Republican Senator. He chose to be a Democrat. And in spite of his occasional personal failings, his record is more on the side of working people than Bush. That's all you can really go by. Kennedy wants to keep his wealth. But he doesn't want to be a rich man in a poor country. Bush does. It is a very huge difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC