Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We badly mishandled Gannon

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 06:27 AM
Original message
We badly mishandled Gannon
and that probably contributed to it not being covered. While we were chasing sex laden conspiracy theories we ignored the obvious. Gannon was there because his questions made the White House's job easier. Maybe Gannon got some action on the side, maybe he didn't, but any side action is wholly irrelevent to the central issue. His presence in the press room made McClellen's and Bush's job easier.

The real scandal is this:

A man who has engaged in illegal activity and owes five figures to Delaware was able to get into the White House in war time. And not just once, but repeatedly for a period of months. One of the following must be true.

1) The SS checked him out exactly like they would anyone else and didn't find anything wrong, so let him in.

2) The SS checked him out exactly like they would anyone else, found this information out, and let him in (as they would anyone else).

3) The SS checked him out exactly like they would anyone else, found this information out, and let him in only after they were told to.

4) The SS either didn't check him out or did so with a much less rigourous check after they were told to do that.

The White House has implicitly stated that 1 is true, 2 could be true and the statements they have made would still be technically accurate. If 3 and 4 are true they lied.

That leaves the WH two bad options. Either the WH is as secure as a kid's tree house while we are at war, or they lied about using influence to get a softball asking lackie in to the WH to help McClellen do his job. Frankly the first scenario is worse for the WH. It lays bare the whole lie about a wartime President who is tough on security. Just how concerned can they be about security if a person who is publicly breaking the law and owes back taxes to the tune of 20k can get routine access to the WH? Can you imagine the havoc such a well placed terrorist could have wrought?

I realize the above isn't titulating nor is it terribly fun. But it is the real, relevent problem that the Gannon mess provided. We should have kept it simple, maybe the press would have covered this if we did. Maybe they wouldn't have, who knows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. Didn't you watch Pax's Lie Detector, JimmyJeff has been vindicated
of all wrong doing! End of story.... /sarcasm

BTW, I agree with you. Actually I think each smaller component of Gannon could of been it's own story. But, hey that's just me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
23. I saw that too, wasn't that lame?
I was laughing my butt off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. Get serious.... they own the media, the legislature and the executive
Edited on Wed Jun-01-05 06:34 AM by BlueEyedSon
there was no way to "correctly handle" Jeffy Lube and achieve different results.

Just like every other lie/inconsistency/hypocrisy (WMD, torture, war profiteering, etc) it was buried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. Its still a story
and a very important one for the reasons you state.

The fact the MSM is trying to spin the story only means its causing them problems and the effort to bring it to light is having the desired effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brewman_Jax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. Wouldn't have mattered
without control of a major news media outlet to constantly pound on the story, the truth becomes trivial. I know (stupid) people who still believe the invasion of Iraq was just, Clinton was a friend of Saddam, Bush* did everything on his own, liberals are the cause of high taxes, and electronic voting is okay.

Goebbels was right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. i think you mean the M$MW
just like the downing st. MINUTES

and on and on...

our job is to turn over all the stones and pass the word if the M$MW ignores us we just need to keep bringing it up.

the security angle
the shill/insider angle
and the sex angle

all should be put out there...

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
6. WE did nothing wrong. CLEARLY the SS were told to stand down on the gay
trickster haunting the hallowed halls of the White House at all hours.

Clearly, he was deemed a person of privilege for sex games.

Come on, no one really believes he wanted to be a serious reporter, do they? That's just the cover the White House threw on him.

We ALL KNOW he was a GAY MALE HOOKER on the white house payroll.

Why pretend he was anything else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
29. BINGO!!!
"We" did nothing wrong...the "liberal" media handled that for us....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
7. Yep. I was yelling about this at the time.
*sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. *sigh*
yelling, thats definitely one of our problems...

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. I didn't yell.
Though you you'd think I would because suggesting that we were mishandling the story got me called a Freeper.

Besides, who needs freepers when there's a bunch of closet homophobes around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. good on ya
:toast:

and the mods are good about dealing with folks calling other evil DU'ers 'freepers', too.

"Besides, who needs freepers when there's a bunch of closet homophobes around."

once they out themselves, they'll be dealt with, as well, bet.

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
8. No... WE always said it wasn't about the sex.
It was the worthless media that picked up the sensationalist sex angle and ran it... erm... dry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. the media didn't 'pick up & run' with any of it
if they had they would still be talking about it.

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. WE covered all the angles here
and who are we to handle it anyway, just a bunch loonies on the web?

it is staggering how it's been given a cloak of invisibility, and staggering how differently it would have been covered IF IT HAD HAPPENED UNDER BILL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. we are a LARGE part of WHY folks come on line to get the LOW down
because we don't play the 'angles' we just put all the dirt out there and let the chips fall where they may and THAT is what makes us a force to be reckoned with ;->

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. We should have played the sex angle all the way up the hill. Come on,
we all KNOW he wasn't a "REPORTER". He was granted access for SEX.

He is a PROSTITUTE. He's NOT a reporter. He's a GAY MALE HOOKER.

WE should have played that angle and poo-pooed the whole BS story about him being a "reporter".

We all know he was played like a fiddle. I bet his client list is rather spectacular!

Think about it. HE had access to the SECRETS of the most powerful man ON THE PLANET.

Pillow talk, baby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. agreed! the parallels to MONICA having ACCESS to the WHITE HOUSE
are STARTLING but no one in the M$MW wants to deal with it.

i'm sure it's all just in our heads though ;->

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. some have been bold enough to ask, 'who was jeff fucking'?
crazy bill maher etc. just imagine jeff fucking any number of male power figures in the white house, even the big guy.

but the sex angle isn't flying because of the white house owned media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. You mean the small guy don't you? ;)
And I think the sex/hooker angle should have been played for all it was worth. It is a major part of the story IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
12. No One Dug Deep Enough
This dude could have led us to the entire Repugnican propaganda and funding machine...but too many took their eyes off the ball.

The frenzy about Gannon/Guckert's sexuality and his outlandish behavior became more the "story" (for those of us who thought it was at the moment) that overshadowed the political and the criminal with the scandilous and titilating. Which way do you think the corporate media was going to go? The "story" got framed as a left wing frenzy on a Gay Repugnican and so the "story" died.

The corporate media is scared shit of Gannon/Guckert and what he represents. The toadies who live in that Press Room knew there was one, if not several, GOOP plants in the press briefings and those who crossed this regime would lose access and get "Helen Thomased". That's a story that I hope one day is exposed.

I'll say it again...this dude was connected into the GOOP slime machine and could have been the gateway to out a bunch of Gannons and expose the corporate media for the complicit abeters they've become.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. for most, it's too unbelievable to accept, like 9-11
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mizmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
15. The guy posted naked hooker pics of himself
Edited on Wed Jun-01-05 07:50 AM by Mizmoon
the sex thing was a little hard to ignore. And the media usually LOVE sex related stories - they're practically pimps with all the sex they offer during sweeps. Whoda thunk they would suddenly decide they were too puritain to report on hookers and stuff?

quick edit for spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. and THAT is another TELL
the M$MW are usually ALL-OVER the SIZZLE and there ain't no bigger SIZZLE than SEX from the M$MW perspective but they RAN AWAY from this story, like MANY others, and clearly demonstrates to me that the game is RIGGED.

i ONLY get my news on-line anymore and my analysis from DU the rest of them are OBSOLETE and CORRUPT.

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hector459 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
20. We didn't mishandle. The MSM just doesn't report on RW-Repub sex scandals
And they surely don't report on RW-Republican-Christian-conservative hypocrisy and lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndreaCG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. And the James Dobsons and Pat Robertsons
Have been just as silent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. we MUST face this FACT squarely or we will waste a LOT of time on 'angles'
now is the time for PLAIN SPOKEN truth-to-power every-chance we get.

passing the word to the M$MW in a polite and professional manner will get trough to some. they need to be educated and it is our DUTY to educate everyone around us... without YELLING, preferably ;->

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
25. Oh please, give me a break.
Edited on Wed Jun-01-05 01:23 PM by merh
If Gannon had been a shill in Clinton's press corp, do you think they would have handled it any differently?

The media is in their pockets, the talking heads like celebrity more than they like the truth. Kerry/Edwards were not given equal press coverage during the election, nothing negative about this admin is hardly ever reported, if it is, it is downplayed or given a sound bite.

Hey, doesn't the handling of the Downing Street Memo give you a clue, it ain't "US" its them and they own the media. Stop beating up on and blaming "US" and start trying to figure out a way to get the media back.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bethany Rockafella Donating Member (916 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
28. Don't blame us. We're not the media.
But we should have known nothing would come out of this...at least not at this time. The Daschel folks uncovered the nude photos of Gannon and alerted reporters yet those reporters didn't say or do anything. Gannon is protected...just like Ken Lay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
river2 Donating Member (86 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
30. We sucked that well dry....
move on...let him fade away into obscurity....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. He's not letting himself "fade away". He was on PAX's "Lie Detector" last
night saying that he was no WH plant. He wanted to clear his name and "My faith in God got me through it all".

He vows to keep plugging away at liberals.

We'll stay on his ass too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC