Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

[sic]?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
indy_azcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 09:00 AM
Original message
[sic]?
Edited on Wed Jun-01-05 09:01 AM by indy_azcat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. [sic]
[sic] or (sic) (from Latin sicut for "just as"; see also List of Latin phrases) is a bracketed expression used to indicate that an unusual spelling, phrase, or any other preceding quoted material is intended to be read or printed exactly as shown (rather than being an error) and should not be corrected. It carries two possible meanings: either that an error was made by the person from which one is quoting, but it would be dishonest to correct it, or that it appears to be an error, but is in fact correct. For example, when quoting a person named Sandra Bollock (not the actress Sandra Bullock), the author might write "a local resident, Sandra Bollock [sic] said that . . .". Many people think that "sic" stands for "spelled incorrectly"; this is actually a misconception, although "sic" is often used to point out an unusual or incorrect spelling.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indy_azcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Guess the Chicago Tribune is dishonest then.
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/chitribts/20050601/ts_chicagotrib/angrybushscornsgulaglabelondetentioncamps

"Bush said that "it seemed like to me based some of their decisions on the word of--and the allegations--by people who were held in detention, people who hate America, people that had been trained in some instances to dissemble--that means not tell the truth. And so it was an absurd report."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yep. No surprise.
Edited on Wed Jun-01-05 09:19 AM by TahitiNut
:shrug:

The very basic meaning of 'journalism' is to accurately record events and quotes without manipulation or revision. Permission to "revise and extend" remarks must receive unanimous consent, even in Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC