Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Must Have Known!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:25 AM
Original message
Bush Must Have Known!
from Paul Thompson, author of "The Terror Timeline", the definitive book on 9/11 and proprietor of the website http://www.complete911timeline.org/:

Sometimes the stuff I find amazes even me. For instance, this entry which I just wrote up today and haven't put on line yet:

Early September 2001
Phone Call Warning of Big Event in the US in Coming Days Is Just One of Many Such Warnings Recorded by CIA
A few days before 9/11, an Islamic radical named Mamdouh Habib is in Pakistan and calls his wife in Australia. Her phone is being monitored by Australian intelligence. In the conversation he says that something big is going to happen in the US in the next few days. He is later arrested after 9/11 and is held by the US in the Guantanamo prison before finally being released in 2005. He is released because his captors eventually decide that he didn't have any special foreknowledge or involvement in the 9/11 plot. He had been in Afghanistan training camps and had picked up the information there. The New York Times paraphrases an Australian official, "Just about everyone in Kandahar (Afghanistan) and the Qaeda camps knew that something big was coming, he said. 'There was a buzz.'" (York Times, 1/29/05) Furthermore, according to The Australian, this call "mirrored several other conversations between accused terrorists that were tapped around the same time by the Pakistani Internal Security Department on behalf of the CIA." This was part of what the CIA called a sharp increase in "chatter" intercepted from operatives in terror training camps in Afghanistan and Pakistan in the days just before the attacks, alluding to an imminent big event. (Australian, 2/2/05)

----

How could US intelligence possibly not know there was going to be an attack in the US within a matter of days after warnings like that? It seems knowledge of the attack was practically as common as dirt in parts of Afghanistan. US intelligence was listening very closely at the time. I've got a comment elsewhere from a National Security Council staffer pointing out that every phone line in Afghanistan was being tapped, every hotel in Pakistan was being bugged. In examples of just a few other entries I already have up:
- They overheard bin Laden tell his mother in law on the phone on September 9 that something big would be happening in two days.
- They knew from satellite surveillance that the Afghan training camps were moving in the days before the attacks.
- They overheard a message telling al-Qaeda operatives to return to Afghanistan by Sept. 10.
- They overheard a phone call from bin Laden shortly before September 11 contacting an associate in Pakistan, referring to an incident that would take place in the US on, or around 9/11, and then discussing possible repercussions.

The list just goes on and on. Yet nothing was done. Absolutely no warnings were given to airports, airlines, NORAD, the military, or any other first response defenders at all. Security was not stepped up at any likely targets. Top leaders were not warned. The only clear warning that we're absolutely sure of was given to Salman Rushdie, of all people, who wasn't allowed to fly in the US that week because the FAA told his publisher they had "intelligence of something about to happen." The FAA confirmed to the press that Rushdie was in fact warned.

I'd really like to see the usual incompetence theory defenders here defend all this as just more incompetence.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=125&topic_id=41338&mesg_id=41338
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. This one bothers me the most
They knew from satellite surveillance that the Afghan training camps were moving in the days before the attacks.

US Intelligence agencies MUST have know this AND passed the information to the highest levels of Government....which did nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. The evidence is overwhelming the intelligence community knew
Just from this bit of info: every phone line in Afghanistan was being tapped, every hotel in Pakistan was being bugged
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Boy - if I was a high gov official - my hair would have been on fire

oh wait....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. Boy - if I was a high gov official - my hair would have been on fire

oh wait....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
30. Exactly
like, duh, they knew where the al Qaeda camps were and did nothing?

They had OBL's phone tapped and did nothing?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eternalburn Donating Member (400 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. The only reason for it.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Amazing!
this slipped almost totally under the MSM radar.....DU is the only place I read about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
5. Bush did something. He went to the ranch. Got out of harm's way.
So did Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VOX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 03:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
45. So did Ashcroft. He stopped taking commercial flights in July 2001.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/07/26/national/main303601.shtml
Ashcroft Flying High
WASHINGTON, July 26, 2001
CBS) Fishing rod in hand, Attorney General John Ashcroft left on a weekend trip to Missouri Thursday afternoon aboard a chartered government jet, reports CBS News Correspondent Jim Stewart.

In response to inquiries from CBS News over why Ashcroft was traveling exclusively by leased jet aircraft instead of commercial airlines, the Justice Department cited what it called a "threat assessment" by the FBI, and said Ashcroft has been advised to travel only by private jet for the remainder of his term.

"There was a threat assessment and there are guidelines. He is acting under the guidelines," an FBI spokesman said. Neither the FBI nor the Justice Department, however, would identify what the threat was, when it was detected or who made it.
<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. In August of '01 ......
..... President Murbarrk (SP????) of Egypt called * and warned him of an
attack. * did nothing.

Ever wonder why he would not go under oath or on the record about
9/11?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
7. Of all the papers which could have run the story....


Murdoch's NY Post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. Is that a real Post cover?
If so, from when?

Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. Yes it is real
Edited on Wed Jun-01-05 03:26 PM by KurtNYC
Around May 16, 2002.

I linked from here (scroll just below midway down - there is a lot of great art on there but this was no photoshop):
http://www.publicdomainprogress.info/archives/2004_03_01_archive.html

Other shots of same Post cover:
http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&lr=&q=bushknew&btnG=Search

edit: image would not cross-link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. Thanks, Kurt.
Love your Avatar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
8. Thanks for posting this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
11. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
12. How else were they gonna get the "Pearl Harbor" event they needed,...
,...to jump start the PNAC agenda?

I believe their complicity is becoming increasingly clear.

Appalling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
14. They knew, and it was either LIHOP or MIHOP...take your choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anarchy1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
15. This is so tough. 9/11 was a wake up call we were not ready for.
Edited on Wed Jun-01-05 11:54 AM by anarchy1999
We knew the moment it happened, it is LIHOP or MIHOP. No question.

It was a tough time for us all. Still is, waiting for all the sheeple to wake up before Rome burns.

on edit:
When Bush was selected by the "supremes", and he surrounded himself with relics from the basement of his father's regime I looked to my husband and said "we are going to war". God I wish I'd been wrong. I was taken by surprise though, I thought it was going to be Latin America first. Silly girl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LunaC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
16. When you put it all in chronological order
the Big Picture emerges and it's obvious to anyone with a brain that the whole damn thing was planned.

Check out the link in my sig line and you'll see their evil unfold right before your eyes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Solid summary.
Thanks. I'm printing it off for quick reference! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulthompson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #16
42. Nice work
But you're missing lots of key stuff. Check out this link:

http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=complete_911_timeline&geopolitics_and_9/11=centralAsia

Especially don't miss the PNAC document from September 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QueenOfCalifornia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 12:03 PM
Original message
yep
Have you read; Why America Slept : The Failure to Prevent 9/11, by
GERALD POSNER?

It is about this very topic.

The Bush family and the Saudi Royals are one big Cabal.

In case someone reading this doesn't know what a Cabal is, here is the definition and it most certainly fits...

Cabal: Noun; the artifices and intrigues of a group of persons secretly united to bring about an overturn or usurpation especially in public affairs; also : a group engaged in such artifices and intrigues

Very good post. It is something that is of vital importance and yet, the non-media is not even mentioning it. Surprise. They are running like sheep, afraid of what Scott McClellan and the White House may do.... The Religious Right is scaring the shit out of the media.

What a bunch of ... Well, I shouldn't say it but I will... ASS HOLES.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
18. I haven't read Posner's book, but I've heard about it
Apparently he blames 9/11 mostly on the Saudis and simply lets off the US government with the charge of incompetence. But it can't have been simple incompetence, the evidence is too clear for foreknowledge by the government that something major was going to happen, and as Thompson points out, almost nothing was done. This can't be explained by mere incompetence, particularly in light of how the Bush administration benefited greatly from 9/11.

Overall, I prefer this book to Posner's:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJCher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #18
37. I heard Tarpley on WBAI the other day
He makes eminent sense. He explained how the U.S. is in control of what he calls the "shadow government." He went on to talk about the incident with the plane flying too close to the WH while bush was running in the park. He said, "This is the shadow government sending a message."

As much as I know about bushco, this interview gave me the chills like nothing else I'd seen or read to date.


Cher
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QueenOfCalifornia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
17. yep and then...
Edited on Wed Jun-01-05 12:06 PM by Gilligan
I was trying to be "nice."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulthompson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
19. Thanks Spook
for posting this in the General Forum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. No problem. I really thought it needed a wider audience.
And thanks for your post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
23. move along
9-11 was clinton's fault

bush is a wise, moral, strong leader

move along
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. What is strange that even some of those on the left can not wrap
their minds around the MIHOP - LIHOP they can not believe that someone would be evil enough to do such a horrendous act. They would admit that B* Cabal is evil, but not to this extent. Somehow America is protected against a Hitler. One of his ilk would never be able to hold office.

When their eyes open to the truth, there will be hell to pay. Those that did this, and the media that covered it up.

Sometimes I am so scared, wondering if I should leave the country, then there are days, I am so angry. I want to see them go down, and will stay to see this happen...back and forth. It is very unsettling. The parallel between now and 1939 is striking.

Right now I am teetering on fear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. I was a MIHOPer the moment I saw the 2nd plane hit the towers.
criminals stage a coup.

they'd do ANYTHING to make trillions and control the world's oil supply after peak oil.

ANYTHING.

9-11 was small potatoes compared to invading Iraq.

Invading Iraq was small potatoes compared to what else they will do and continue doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #26
36. That is exactly how I felt at that moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #26
40. I wasn't one until I researched it more
Then all the evidence just made me realize it. Seeing everything and reading about it. Then I got into the whole Bush family in general and everything from Prescott and WW2 to Poppy and Kennedy and Iran/Contra. So I do believe in a "shadow" government. I remember when the 5/11 plane thing happened and how strange it was. First of all I know that the Bush group love the number eleven. It's a powerful number in the spiritual world. Second of all I didn't buy the story of them either being lost or a student learning. When I was first learning to drive my dad signed my brother and I up for a driving class at the college I now attend and whenever I was at the wheel, even on test day, I wasn't allowed to do ANYTHING without the instructor saying so, so that whole story is total bullshit. How can you be lost a hundred feet away from the White House? Couldn't you know where you are? I'm not an idiot y'know. They could've made something more believable up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
24. Or, as in the recent evac. in D.C., was * kept in the dark?
Give him plausible deniability and let the PNAC work its magic behind the curtain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #24
34. yeah, makes sense
They are getting ready for criminal charges or the impeachment process and this keeps Doofus out of the loop, clears him since he only does what he is told.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJCher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #24
38. see my post 37

Cher
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
27. Tell the people in power to do something about it.
We can't do anything and I'm tired of being emotionally dragged down by these people.

They're simply choosing to do nothing either. (which means I shall choose not to vote for them in the future.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. LIHOP- No doubt.
It is obvious that is was LIHOP.

The time lines of before and after leave no room for doubt about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #27
41. The people who can do something
aren't in power to do anything. They'd be destroyed for sure. I wish there could be something too. *sigh* It is very tiring and depressing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
31. They knew.
The neoCONcriminals knew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OrlandoGator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
32. On 1 June 2001, NORAD procedures for hijackings were changed.
Edited on Wed Jun-01-05 08:27 PM by OrlandoGator
http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/analysis/norad/docs/intercept_proc.pdf

This document changed the way NORAD responded to "derelict" (hijacked or out of control) commercial airplanes. Instead of an automatic response of scrambling intercept fighters, the order to engage had to be delivered directly by the Secretary of Defense himself.

The kicker is that even after 9/11, this procedure was never changed back. Fucking frightening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. What possible motivation underlies that procedural change?
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
35. MIHOP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
39. NORAD was prepared
Edited on Wed Jun-01-05 11:13 PM by FreedomAngel82
They even did practices leading up to it. But where were they on the actual day? I also remember reading how that week the FAA hired a brand new guy who didn't know what the hell he was doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OrlandoGator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #39
46. Check the link in post #32.
It's amazing to me that this change in NORAD protocol three months before 9/11 hasn't been screamed from the mountaintops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecai Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
43. Project Echelon
Edited on Thu Jun-02-05 12:12 AM by thecai
I thought all cell phones, computers, ATMs, etc. were also monitored by Echelon Satellites PRIOR to 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulthompson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. Yep
Here's a little bit I have on Echelon:

Echelon Intelligence Network Used on al-Qaeda
By the 1980's, a high-tech global electronic surveillance network shared between the US, Britain, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand is gathering intelligence all over the world. The BBC describes Echelon's power as “astounding,” and elaborates: “Every international telephone call, fax, e-mail, or radio transmission can be listened to by powerful computers capable of voice recognition. They home in on a long list of key words, or patterns of messages. They are looking for evidence of international crime, like terrorism.” (BBC 11/3/99) One major focus for Echelon before 9/11 is al-Qaeda. A former staff member of the National Security council who regularly attended briefings on bin Laden later recalls that, "We are probably tapped into every hotel room in Pakistan. We can listen in to just about every phone call in Afghanistan." However, he and other critics claim one reason US intelligence fails to stop terrorism before 9/11 is too much of a focus on electronic intelligence gathering and not enough focus on human interpretation of that vast data collection. (Toronto Star, 2/2/02)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecai Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #44
47. THAT Figures!
Excuses for U.S. Intelligence failure to stop terrorism before 9/11...
Riiiiiiiiiight!
When I first researched Echelon in the late 90's, there were only 4 stations in the world. Within approximately 2 years, there were 11. I recall a lady was put on a terrorist list because she stated in a cell-phone conversation that her "son really bombed in the school play", (meaning bad performance).
Thank you for posting that, PaulThompson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecai Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
48. Kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC