Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This 'Deep Throat should have gone to the authorities' is total B.S.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
MnFats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:24 PM
Original message
This 'Deep Throat should have gone to the authorities' is total B.S.
Edited on Wed Jun-01-05 10:24 PM by MnFats
As the FBI's No. 2 man, he had access to all the investigative information --- and he knew the investigation, by design, was going to go nowhere. The Nixonians had the juice to kill it --- THAT is WHY Nixon appointed L.Patrick Gray -- a compliant ninny.
Felt knew NO ONE would be held responsible for the WAtergate crimes ---- and they went FAR BEYOND a 'third rate burglary' - unless somebody took the information to the press. Remember, the Post was way out on a limb for months on Watergate. SOMEBODY had to keep the story alive....
God I hate these fuggin Righties like Buchanan expressing outrage at Felt. The sumbitch wanted Nixon to fight it out....which would have led to a bloodbath in Congress.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. The head of the FBI was destroying documents
and was part of the Watergate cover up. John Mitchell was the Attorney General and he was paying off the burglars. The White House was a criminal enterprise. Who the Hell was Felt supposed to go to in the chain of command? There was no one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Of course
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. The "authorities" were the crooks. Gee, that sounds oddly familiar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
followthemoney Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Speaking truth to power says Chomsky...
is pointless. They already know the truth.

They certainly did in this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. He DID go to the authorities
In those days, when corrupt politicians were corrupt, people could go to the media.

The media...ya know..."the watchdogs of the government'....remember that? Used to mean something.

No longer means anything.

Meaningless phrase.

No more media.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. What do these idiot wingnuts think
That the DC Police could just waltz up to the White House and slap the cuffs on old Tricky Dick?

No, they know better. They're just angry at Felt for violating the Omerta code of their Cosa Nostra on the Potomac.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. MSNBC: Deep Throat - Hero or Rat?
That pretty much says it all. The obvious implication is "Of course he was a RAT."

We are sooooooooooooooooooo fucked.

America is gone.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stirk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. It makes me very happy to hear right-wingers making that argument.
Edited on Wed Jun-01-05 11:06 PM by Stirk
This is one of those issues that really shows how loony the far-right is.

Every one of these right-wingers who are publicly frothing at the mouth over Felt's "betrayal" are saying very clearly, "we commit crimes and we don't want you stupid peons to know about it".

Even people who aren't that familiar with Watergate know what "Deep Throat" symbolizes. He's become a sort of myth in our society; a short-hand way of referring to a person of conscience stuck in a corrupt government. To see right-wingers on TV ranting about their divine right to commit crimes and abuse power- especially under this current Republican government- is simply surreal.

It's a rare moment of candor for these guys, and I'll bet they leave alot of moderate Republicans with a very bad taste in their mouths.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EnfantTerrible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. Ummmm
As #2 at the FBI at the time wouldn't it be fair to say that he was the authorities?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MnFats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Yes. that's my point. he was able to see that the investigation...
...would be shitcanned, and realized what a tragedy that would be for the country....REad "All the President's Men," by Woodward and Bernstein, please, please read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EnfantTerrible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I understood what you were saying...
I was just pointing out the irony of the fundies saying he should have gone to the authorities when he was the authorities. Haven't read "All the Presidents Men", but of course I've seen the film... As is usually the case, the book is no doubt better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. What I have always wondered about this deep throat guy is...
since he basically ratted on the corrupt repukes in the White House, was he not concerned that someone would be following him or either the three reporters that he was revealing this info to? Did he not worry about getting bumped off?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vyan Donating Member (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Yes...
IMO, That's why he didn't come forward for 30 years.

Vyan
http://vyan.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC