Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sorry John, we don't need the "best election system money can buy"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 01:25 PM
Original message
Sorry John, we don't need the "best election system money can buy"
Edited on Thu Jun-02-05 01:26 PM by SoCalDem
Money cannot 'buy' a fair election.. it CAN royally screw up an election. John Edwards meant well, but that statement turns me OFF.

We need a SIMPLE...election system..

Federal offices MUST be separated from the local/state offices (to keep it focused and simple)

By doing that ONE thing, the ballots becomes, at MOST , 3 races..

congress
senate
president

For an election THAT easy, one needs NO machines..

a 5 x 7 card with those 3 races...check-box immediately next to the names of the candidates..and a sharpie pen..

After the election's over, call in the gazillions of unemployed local people, and get them busy counting..

videotape the whole counting process..inculding the calliing in of totals..take a screen cap of the written down tabulations..give each district's numbers to the press..

The states and locals elections could be whenever they choose.. I don;t care about who's county commissioner in Dubuque, Iowa, but I do care who their congress/senate person is..

Fedearl elections should stay in even years...local.state could be in odd years..

This would also prevent 'bloody shirt' propositions being piled onto ballots to muddy the waters.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MichiDem Donating Member (135 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm not familiar with the term
"bloody shirt". Could you explain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Gay marriage, abortion, guns, ten commandments, flag burning
Edited on Thu Jun-02-05 01:41 PM by SoCalDem
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I Assume he's talking about the gay marriage initiatives
for an example. Shoved on the ballots to remind America that a vote for Democrats is a vote for Gay marraige.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Following the Civil War, Republican politicians would
"wave the bloody shirt" in campaigns against the Democratic party, reminding voters that it had supported the Confederacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Coliniere Donating Member (581 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. The Canadian Method...
You pretty much articulated the way Canadian elections are held. All paper/pen ballots hand counted in a matter of hours. They do so many things right in Maple Leaf Land: Green Belts around cities to limit urban sprawl, universal health care, real community/public involvement when it comes to municipal decision making. I could go on and on. If the Canadians can hold honest elections, so can we damn it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
socoljam Donating Member (29 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. Why I was little...
I assumed everyone had the same voting system we have in Michigan. Big paper ballots, with arrows pointing directly at the name of the candidates (or yes/no, whatever) and you take a pen, complete the arrow for John Kerry. It goes through a scantron right in front of you. Paper ballot, easily counted, almost impossible to screw up (and if you do, the machine rejects it).

I honestly thought all states used this great system, and I don't understand why more don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Hi socoljam!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC