Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Edwards: "I gotta get this off my chest.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 01:51 PM
Original message
John Edwards: "I gotta get this off my chest.
While we're working on democracy over there, we've got a little work on democracy to do over here. (Standing ovation) You know, I don't know about you, but I've seen about enough of vote challengers and vote protectors. You know, it is an outrage that in America, in America, any voter should have reason to doubt their vote. So here's a new idea. How about if we actually build the best election system money can buy so that the next time you choose the leader of the free world you don't have any doubt that when you go to the polls you're going to be able to vote, you gonna to be able to vote quickly, and you have absolutely no doubt that your vote was counted in the election. That's what we believe in.

Source: CSPAN

(I transcribed. Thank god for tivo.)




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. How about all paper ballots and no electronic voting.
Just a thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I couldn't agree more!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. My SOE was rendered speechless when he made that
suggestion at a DEC meeting out of frustration to our objections about our county's Diebold optical scan system and was greeted by a hearty round of applause. He honestly could not understand that we'd be willing to wait for a hand count instead wanting instant computer tabulations of unverifiable results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. No profit in that!
Remember the corporate/government merger is all about control and that bottom line. Gotta keep things complex, expensive, and manipulable for that!

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1monster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. and no eletronic counting either, unless the count is not certified until
it is backed up by a hand count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merwin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. Personally, I think that they should use an ATM way of thinking.
First, all software and hardware involved will have extensive code reviews by various universities the public will have access to the source code.

Have the voting machines linked up to a SECURE database of registered voters, with every voter being given a PIN after they vote, where they can later look up whether or not their vote was recorded, and get a copy of their ballot if they want to.

All machines print paper ballots directly into cases that lock when removed from the machine, as well as storing them in the central database, and after the election ends, these cases will be plugged into a central machine that unlocks the cases and counts the printed ballots.

Working at an election booth will be a JOB that you get paid to do, and extensive training on it, as well as reviews by supervisors. Everything you do while you are working election booth will be biometrically recorded, and it will be a felony to tamper with even a single vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #22
53. We DO get paid...
$100 for the day
$150 for the chief because there are additional meetings, training and responsibilities.
Sign up. It is open to anyone in VA I don't know how they run it in any other state.
I've been taking vacation days from my regular job to work the polls. Try it. Contact your local (county?) electoral board and sign up. It will be an experience you will never forget.

Our polls open at 6:00, so we have to be there at 5:00 am. I usually get home around 10 - 10:30 -- after all day on my feet, then tallying the votes for my precinct, filling out all the paperwork and dropping it off at the electoral board. In November I was up 'til 11:00 the night before getting the room set up and marking all the people on my pollbooks who had requested absentee ballots.

By the time the polls close, the people working have had a very long day. The last thing they need is to hand count the ballots. I could almost guarantee mistakes from people who are that tired. I am glad you said to let a machine count, but don't certify until they have been confirmed by hand. That allows for the hand count to be performed at a later date. It also allows for a second, confirmation hand count if the human and machine numbers don't match.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #53
56. Not good enough for Democracy.
Too tired? Fine. Let there be a SECOND SHIFT! People who are bright eyed and bushy tailed, and teams of people there to confirm that votes are counted properly!

THERE IS NO FUCKING EXCUSE IN THE WORLD TO HAVE TO PUT UP WITH COMPUTERIZED VOTE COUNTING MACHINES THAT TALLY VOTES IN SECRET, AND COME UP WITH BOGUS TOTALS!!

"Too tired" for Democracy? You shouldn't HAVE TO BE!! The whole system needs to be set up so that every vote is counted honestly, no matter how many people, no matter how many shifts it takes, to get the job done right.

:kick::kick::kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 07:01 AM
Response to Reply #56
63. agreed
:applause:

"too tired" is not a good excuse. Right, bring in fresh counters. We need hand counting, even if machine counting (optiscan) is also done.

Maybe in the future computerized voting can be made safe and transparent--but that day is a LONG way off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #22
55. You don't need software for a process done once in 2 years (nt)
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayctravis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #22
57. Every voter should draw a sticker out of a fishbowl
when he approaches the voting booth. The sticker has a 20 digit serial number and the date of the election. The voter affixes this serial number to his ballot and votes, retaining the card the sticker came from which has the same serial number on it.

All votes are posted on a website by serial numbers, and the list of votes are published in a paper almanac. Nobody knows what number you got, because the sticker is drawn randomly.

All votes would be accounted for and verifiable and countable by anyone who wishes to verify the results and their own vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IdaBriggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 06:17 AM
Response to Reply #57
59. That is the EASIEST, CHEAPEST, BEST SOLUTION --
I have EVER read!!! Please go start a separate thread for it!!! Thank you!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #57
67. this has possibilities
I really agree with increasing public survelliance during the actual process. This would help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. Hear hear
Edited on Thu Jun-02-05 02:08 PM by FreedomAngel82
Paper ballots EVERYWHERE. Why should I be able to go in and vote for a few minute's while someone else has to wait two-three hours to vote? That's just bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
43. Yeah -- quite a lot cheaper than "the best machines money can buy"
Edited on Thu Jun-02-05 08:11 PM by Eloriel
but at least he's talking about it. Many, many months too, too late, but ... well, at least he's talking about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #43
64. DRE electronic voting machines
are roughly 5X the cost of paper ballots/optiscan systems. They also have high maintenance and repair costs. It's a scam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
48. was just thinking the same thing!
it's no good unless you specify that we need ballots, a paper trail, no e-voting!!!




(did you sign the letter? here's the link)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
54. I agree.
Edited on Fri Jun-03-05 12:07 AM by Eric J in MN
Paper ballots, publicly hand-counted on election night.

Let anyone who wants watch the ballot box during the election and watch the couting on election night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Okay, John. I'm with you on that. Now let's put that legendary
class action trial lawyer butt in gear and get a suit going on behalf of voters everywhere. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Hear! Hear! Get all "Clarence Darrow" on their ass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. Nom. for Greatest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Thanks, elehhhhna! I do believe it is important that a politician said
this on live television.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
27. Well you're up to 8 nom's, toots! Good job!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. Right on, baby. Why wasn't he saying this earlier though?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davsand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Too bad the Kerry Edwards ticket wasn't this passionate on the issue.
Seems a little late to be standing up and speaking out for counting the votes.


Laura
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I understand Edwards wanted to fight in Ohio about the votes
but Kerry didn't.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Yeah, I'd heard that, too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ultraist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
38. Edwards DID want to fight for the votes
Senator Edwards stated in an interview he did want to fight but that it wasn't his decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. After the STOLEN election of 2000, there is NO excuse!
Additional warning signs and corruption were popping up for YEARS leading up to 2004.

No fucking excuse. The Dems FAILED -again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. I agree that there is no excuse, but you don't know until you know.
The fact that our elections are screwed up was a hard pill for me to swallow, too. It took countless hours of research and reading for me to come to that conclusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiegranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
13. so in other words,
Mr. Edwards is confirming the election was stolen. It is nice to have some validation from our leaders on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Actually, I think he is just confirming that we can't verify that
it was stolen or not. I don't think he's gone as far as to cast accusations of fraud. I think he should, but I think he's being careful in what he says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. I think you are right. It's clear he is saying there were doubts in the
election, but do you think he would even bring this up if he didn't think he (actually we) was screwed royally?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Oh I think that is what he believes.
and probably what he means. I just think he's going to be very careful about how he frames it in speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigBearJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
18. YES!!!!!!!!!!!! (((RECOMMENDED)))
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. Thanks, BigBearJohn!
:pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
linazelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
19. How about "we're going to ensure every vote is counted"?
Yeah right. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Just remember that he didn't make all of those decisions, and
he had a very sick wife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ultraist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #23
41. It was KERRY'S decision, not Edwards'
KERRY chose NOT to fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmatthan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
20. Looks like he read my entry on his blog

about Russia at the TPM Cafe. This is a direct answer to my views that I had expressed. I had written at

http://www.tpmcafe.com/story/2005/6/1/143249/6794

"I noted with interest that the Committee was to review:

The state of Russia's democracy (or lack thereof), changes that could be anticipated between now and Russia's presidential election in 2008, human rights in Russia, the Russian economy (including energy), non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and its cooperation in the fight against Islamic extremism.

I think John Edwards and the Committee he is co-chairing, before embarking on this visit, should examine exactly the same questions vis-a-vis the US. Many of us in the international field are likely to view any comments by US on these issues in Russia (or any other country) as the Pot calling the Kettle Black!!

Let not this Committee, like Nick Coleman's or Rishard Lugar's, be the laughing stock of the world!!"

Jacob Matthan
http://jmpolitics.blogspot.com
Oulu, Finland
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
28. For About the 20th Time... I Say
Edwards/Richardson!! You've just got to think about it. It works for me!!!

Love the guy and I really really feel he can do it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. I don't know anything about Richardson, but I followed Edwards the last
time and really like him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. I'd take Edwards/Anyone...
but Richardson would do. Personally, (though probably unrealistic) I'd prefer Edwards/Boxer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sojourner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Mmmmmmmmmmmmmm.....Yummy!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daphne08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
29. Yes! I would choose paper ballots counted in full view of
all interested parties to verify the process.

Americans have placed too much trust in the election system.

We cast our votes and then forget about 'those who count them' at the various levels.

No more!





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. People vote by precincts...
and they could count by precincts... There aren't that many votes in any precinct that could not be counted by handed....screw the machines!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Twist_U_Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
33. National Election Day !!
this should be a day off from work Holiday. A Friday or a Monday would be nice

Hi Mr. Edwards I like your style
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithlet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #33
46. Yes
At the very least, all employees should be allowed to take the time to vote without worrying about being harassed for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
34. Evening kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sojourner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
36. Another "Kick" for ya!!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ultraist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
37. Check out Edwards' speech @ the Campaign for America's Future Conference
http://www.dembloggers.com/

He frames the Republican agenda well by asking, "what values does it represent when they cut support for our most needy?" "What message does that send out?" "What does that say about the values of our country?"

"How about we stand up and fight with passion for what we believe in?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Thanks for the link.
I'm sending it around. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
40. KICK!
I love you John and Elizabeth!!

:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ultraist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. John and Elizabeth are starting a video blog and book forum
On their website:
http://www.oneamericacommittee.com/

They are also doing podcasts linked at their site. Elizabeth posted recently that she was completing her treatments and she sounded great on the last podcast!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. Thank You
Just signed up :D

Alas, I'll settle for the blogs, I am podless, technoluddite that I am.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ultraist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. Edwards discusses the importance of the internet in one of his videoblogs
On one of his videoblogs, he states that the press picks and chooses and the internet allows for an UNFILTERED message.

BTW, you don't need a pod to listen to the podcasts. If you have realplayer on your computer (download is free) you're all set!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
44. My admiration for John & Elizabeth Edwards....
Just continues to grow!! They are awesome. They keep fighting to make this country better for the least among us. Way to go!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 06:45 AM
Response to Reply #44
61. I agree. Edwards is still a rising Star.
After Dean was in the tank he was my second choice. I hope I have the chance to pull the lever again for him. I suspect I will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
47. Hear! Hear!
I'm with you, John & Elizabeth!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melissa G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
50. Thanks for all you do MelissaB! Great post! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ailsagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
51. Thanks for transcribing that-- I've done it myself when I didn't
Edited on Thu Jun-02-05 10:06 PM by ailsagirl
have a link but wanted to pass on what I heard. It takes a little effort but well worth it.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turn CO Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
52. Does John Edwards have the best smile or what?
Elizabeth, sweetie, you sure did marry a cutie!

Anyway, thanks to John Edwards, the REAL Vice-President of the US, for speaking up about voting and elections today!

The rest of the speech was great too -- about our Democratic core values and convictions...some lines very reminiscent of FDR...mention of workers and poverty here and abroad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
58. I HEAR him...but I'll believe it when I see it.....
....and even then I'll be skeptical...I sent him several black box voting emails this time last year and got jack SQUAT back about it either....havin' blind faith in some rhetoric....can't get excited about it..been let down to damn too many times! :nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
60. He gave a great speech.
Really hitting on the issues of poverty and lack of opportunity.

I think he is really a true populist -- a man of the people. He clearly has not forgotten his roots. He appears to be truly compassionate.

Honestly, If he runs again and continues speaking in this way he will get my vote.

He is photogenic and just unbelievably likable and a good, compelling speaker. Just hope he isn't assasinated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
62. Bravo, John!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
65. Yay John
ANY politician (state or fed) who isn't concerned with fixing--really fixing--our ridiculous, corrupt, pathetic, byzantine SHAMBLES of an election system does NOT have the best interests of the American people at heart.

The more JE and other Dems confront this fundamental flaw in the system the better, and the more support they will have. Maybe after the "selection" process backfired on them, they finally got it. This is a key issue. I will not "vote" for or support anyone who has not actively worked on bringing about major election reforms.

*(right now I have to put "vote" in quotes--maybe someday we can actually think voting matters again).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
66. "I choose to be inspired"
What an inspiration he is too....if you haven't already, read his book "Four Trials" :thumbsup:

There's also a group dedicated to the man and his ideals and politics at:

www.jregrassroots.org

This shameless plug brought to you by having Hope for America :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
68. Well put, Mr. Edwards!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC