Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

No Kidding...it takes a pundit to tell the truth?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 09:39 AM
Original message
No Kidding...it takes a pundit to tell the truth?
Take a look at Corn's posting on Huffington. He's got it right and our politicians ONA ALL LEVELS should pay attention to this.

... What strikes me now is the asymmetry between the left and right on this topic. If you were to attend the Conservative Political Action Conference (the grand meeting of rightwingers in Washington), you undoubtedly would hear many speakers from the platform--particularly Republican leaders--talk supportively about the war without hesitation. And the crowd would be in sync with these speakers. But over on the left, the friendly political leaders who drop by to address the troops avoid Iraq, and the crowd is disappointed and even angry. The bottom line: there is a disconnect in the progressive/Democratic world that does not exist in the conservative/Republican world. As long as that remains, it will likely be harder for the gang here to "take back" America.

note: emphasis is mine....



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. The Downing Street Minutes opens the door for the "Left" to speak out
on Iraq. THEY WERE LIED TO. They never would have voted for the invasion had they known what they know now. After the Minutes come out on the Senate floor on Monday, I think we will see a "connection" and the Progressives and the Democrats will be on the same page. At least that's my hope. :shrug: It could happen. Maybe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. But they should have known then pretty much what they know now.
It was obvious what * was up to. They had 2 months before the election. The senate should have just shelved the vote until after the election. * started this just so he could screw up the mid-term elections. Why are so few Democrats in Washington getting this? Do they all watch FOX News? How could they not know that was the game plan with *? Then there were the letters against giving * the authority. I heard it was 100 to 1 against. Then there were the demonstrations. Plus the Constitution says congress declares war. The Dem screwed up big time. And here we are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC