Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Some say it was about Oil, some say about strategic positioning

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 11:06 AM
Original message
Some say it was about Oil, some say about strategic positioning
some say War Profiting. While all of those are true I believe the main reason was Bully Posturing. We wanted to show the world that the US would fight and destroy a country just because we could and would. It is a form of intimidation and the Republicans excel in intimidation. Plus it was a way of enriching the GOP through War Profiting and campaign kickbacks. I believe that 95% of the reason we went to war with Iraq was "to show them ragheads who's boss" I don't think that part of the plan worked so well though. Halliburton and Cheney have certainly gotten much wealthier but I don't think the other Mideast countries are overly impressed with the US war effort. I think they now feel they can hold their own against the US and the exact opposite of what the NeoCons wanted to accomplish is happening. We are not safer today than we were five years ago and will never ever again be so. The US has become a world Pariah and many people hate it with a passion that was not there before the Bush* Cabal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. Very well put. I believe the author of "Bush On the Couch".....
Edited on Sat Jun-04-05 11:24 AM by Jade Fox
would agree with you. The psychological implications of what we are
doing in Iraq outweigh the practical ones. And Bush wanted to go
to war with Iraq to both defend his father Bush I, and to best him.

Its disturbing, to say the least, how many Americans resonate with
the whole Bully Posturing approach. I didn't realize I lived in a country
populated by so many bully-wannabees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. Bullies Only Know One Method, Imtimidation!
The good thing about bullies, when you punch them right back, they are nearly always feeble and weak.

They do not expect a response and when they get one, they just move onto some other victim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. That might be for the people who support the war
I think that the motive you ascribe is applicable to the general population who support the war. The general public is more interested in the US strutting around the globe than freeing the Iraqis, or any other people for that matter. However, for the power brokers, the war is about power and greed, pure and simple. The only reason that the war has been going so poorly is because of their averice and arrogance, and their refusal to listen to the experience military and diplomatic personnel who happen to contradict their ideologically driven assumptions..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Good point.
Edited on Sat Jun-04-05 11:29 AM by smoogatz
If the US had followed the Powell Doctrine of overwhelming force and a clear exit strategy, we'd probably not have invaded in the first place, or if we had, would've crushed the insurgency in its infancy, before it had a chance to coalesce and gather steam. We should have had troops on every street corner in Baghdad, much as the allies did in Berlin after WWII. What was required was a show of invincible force, coupled with martial law--strict law and order, looters shot on sight, the whole deal. Instead, they tried to do it on the cheap, and now the insurgents are calling the shots, and US troops are hunkered down in reactive, defensive posture. A total clusterfuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. Kick their Ass, Take their Gas
Strategic positioning of forward bases and becoming the dominant military power in the Middle East are really extensions of the oil grab. Bushco care about dominating the ME entirely because it has vast oil reserves. Iraq's may be bigger even than Saudi Arabia's--no meaningful exploration's been done there since before the Iran/Iraq war. We do know that Iraq has likely reserves of at least 220 billion barrels, and (pre-insurgency) the lowest production costs in the world. That's enough oil to supply 100% of US domestic consumption for around thirty years, at current rates. Its value @ $55 per barrel is over 12 TRILLION dollars--roughly equal to the entire GDP of the US for 2004. Anyone who tries to argue that Iraq's oil is an insignificant prize is talking through their hat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colorado Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yes! I think you're right. Especially since recent publications
are now speculating that Saudi Arabia has been overpumping and may have overstated its reserves.

Here's a link to another discussion thread on this topic:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=209x1861
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC