Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MTP: Mehlman on DSM says report has been discredited by everyone else who

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 12:46 PM
Original message
MTP: Mehlman on DSM says report has been discredited by everyone else who
Edited on Sun Jun-05-05 12:47 PM by MelissaB
who's looked at it




MR. RUSSERT: Let me turn to the now-famous Downing Street memo. This was a memo, July 23, 2002, from the head of British intelligence to Prime Minister Blair; in effect, notes taken from a briefing that was given to Prime Minister Blair after the head of British intelligence came back from a trip to Washington. It says this: " reported on his recent talks in Washington. There was a perceptible shift in attitude. Military action was now seen as inevitable. Bush wanted to remove Saddam, though military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy."

This is July of 2002. We didn't invade until March of 2003. And the prime minister of Great Britain is being told by the head of his intelligence that he went to Washington and believes that a decision had already been made and that the administration was fixing or manipulating the intelligence to support the policy.

MR. MEHLMAN: Tim, that report has been discredited by everyone else who's looked at it since then. Whether it's the 911 Commission, whether it's the Senate, whoever's looked at this has said there was no effort to change the intelligence at all. The fact is that the intelligence of this country, the intelligence of Britain, the intelligence of the United Nations, the intelligence all over the world said that there were weapons of mass destruction present in Iraq. We knew that Saddam Hussein had used weapons of mass destruction before. We still know that there was a weapons of mass destruction program. He was evading the sanctions, and he had plans to reconstitute the program. We also knew that Saddam Hussein had uniquely invaded his neighbors, had uniquely supported terrorists and we all know today that we are safer because he's been removed from power.

So I believe that that individual report not only has been discredited but that the overall reasons for removing Saddam Hussein were broader than that, they were correct, and we're now safer and certainly the people of Iraq are safer now that Saddam Hussein has been removed from power.

MR. RUSSERT: I don't believe that the authenticity of this report has been discredited.

MR. MEHLMAN: I believe that the findings of the report, the fact that the intelligence was somehow fixed have been totally discredited by everyone who's looked at it.


MR. RUSSERT: There--let me go back to another sentence from that report. "There was little discussion in Washington of the aftermath after military action." Paul Wolfowitz, the deputy defense secretary, now head of the World Bank, said the other day, "The war never ended," and the concern many Americans have, Mr. Mehlman, is that we now have 1,669 Americans who've died bravely in Iraq, 1,532 of those after the president said major combat operations were over. We have 12,762 Americans wounded or injured, 12,000 of those after the president said major combat was over. This memo seems to suggest that the head of British Intelligence told Prime Minister Blair that there was little discussion in Washington to plan for the aftermath of military action.

MR. MEHLMAN: I would respectfully disagree with that finding. I think that there was clearly planning that occurred, planning that occurred to deal with the results of the war. If you remember after the first Gulf War, whether it was the breaching of the dams that we saw all over Iraq, that didn't happen. Whether it was the fires that we saw, that didn't happen this past time. Plans were made for after the war. There's no question that there has been an insurgency. The insurgents understand the stakes of the situation in Iraq. They understand that if we're successful, their efforts to promote terrorism around the world, their efforts to defeat democracy and freedom will be hurt. And there's no question-- therefore, we need to deal with these insurgents.

But the president has mentioned repeatedly that he thinks every day about it and meets with the families of the men and women who have given their lives in Iraq. They've given their lives for an incredibly noble cause. We did plan for the future. There are some things you can plan for. There are some things that are harder to plan for, but I believe we're doing a very important mission in Iraq, which is defeating the terrorists, promoting democracy and you've seen throughout this spring what the effects of that democracy have been in other Arab nations.

MR. RUSSERT: The primary rationale given for the war, however, was the elimination of weapons of mass destruction. And again I refer you to the memo of the prime minister's meeting. "It seemed clear that Bush had made up his mind to take military action, even if the timing was not yet decided. But the case was thin. Saddam was not threatening his neighbours, and his WMD capability was less than half that of Libya, North Korea and Iran."

MR. MEHLMAN: Well, the president, I think, was responsible in saying we need to simultaneously prepare for war and also try to avoid that war. There were simultaneous efforts at the diplomatic stages that were made and yet at the same time it would have been irresponsible for us to say we're going to wait and then plan for war later because we wouldn't have had as effective an effort as we did to remove Saddam Hussein from power, so we needed to do both at the same time. I would also, though, disagree, as I said a moment ago, with the notion that Iraq was somehow less of a threat. Iran and North Korea hadn't invaded their neighbors. Iran and North Korea hadn't used weapons of mass destruction. Iran and North Korea hadn't, in the same way that Saddam Hussein had, been paying off suicide bombers in Israel and in the Palestinian territories. Iran and North Korea are serious challenges. So was Saddam Hussein, and removing him makes the world safer, makes America safer.

Link: http://msnbc.msn.com/id/8062380/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. that's a pretty weak spin, esp. if you actually read the memo. I think all
DUers need to keep a couple copies in their pockets at all times :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree, but this is their angle for now. If they repeat it enough,
people will believe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snotcicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
28. Is Lurch the new goto guy on the inside now
or would nobody else touch that one with a ten foot pole?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wow, not bad, Russert.....
Notice how Mehlman characterizes denials as to the content of the memo
as it being "discredited".

So if people say it's not true, than it's not? Not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I was surprised at Russert, too.
Nice surprise, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I think he's like most of the "moderates" or "liberals" in the media....
he's got his finger in the wind constantly testing which way the wind is
blowing, and adjusting his agenda accordingly.

The good news is that this means The Memo is now considered fair grounds
for true inquireries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. It sez to me that Russert KNOWS this is gonna blow up as an issue,
and he can't afford ruining his reputation further to keep looking like a Bush water carrier on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
34. I agree - and for that reason, his approach to it
is noteworthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Russert was actually tough on Mehlman
I'm glad Russert didn't do his usual pandering to the rethugs. Just reading the transcript, I could practically see Mehlman squirming.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. crooks and liars will have video posted later today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
37. You mean, if the Admin doesn't admit it, its not true.
"Discredited" either the word they use for "we deny it" when the WH has the balls to take a position or "you can't prove it" when it doesn't.

All the memo says is what the Brits, who were there and could see the wheels turning and the intel being shaped, thought at the time. Which was the same thing O'Neill and Clarke thought at the time, and which would explain why WMD never DID show up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opusprime Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. Total denial...
Mehlman basically "respectfully" disagreed with every source Russert quoted. So in other words, everybody on the planet is a liar... except us.

Dont believe anything anyone else in the world tells you, just trust the Bush administration.

No Thanks. Only the brain dead would believe anything else these Facists have to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. This Gives Me Hope Regarding The DSM
If Russert wasn't doing his usual repug bootlicking it says to me this thing may have legs. Thank you John Conyers and everyone else who are doing their best to bring it to the forefront.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. I can't wait to see that video
I wish he'd have Conyers on there to talk about the memo. Or even Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'm in awe that Russert handled it in this way
You'd think he would be feeding answers within his questions. But instead, he opens with "Let me turn to the now-famous Downing Street memo." Now famous? Wow.

And what's this? "...that report has been discredited by everyone else who's looked at it since then." Who the hell is he talking about? He's going to get a skewering by every left radio talker on the planet.

I missed the show. When does it repeat on MSNBC? I gotta see this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. I wonder what the "average" American who depends on the corporate media
for news thinks about that? The now famous DSM...never heard of it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Given how Russert has been such a suck up
Wingnuts must be pretty well invested in watching him and accepting how he usually treats the right wing. Feeding answers within questions and generally being on their side. So, I can see coffee cups all over his audience stopping midway between table and lips. Tomorrow's water cooler conversations may escelate the slow drip drip drip at least a little bit.

I'm reminded of just about every interview of Russert himself. Interviewers always tell him how his Sunday show sets the tone for the upcoming week's news and talking head broadcasts. Heh...heh...heh...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. the stench of the rotting corpse
of the bush administration is so odorous that even the coroner`s stomachs are revolting against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
13. Kenny is just following the "repeat your talking point" strategery.
Sometimes it works. Sometimes it doesn't. It depends on how much trouble you're in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrior1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
14. The fool makes it too easy
Hello Ken? There are no WMD. Along with everything else that was said by you bunch. The memo is stating correctly how we got to Iraq.

Idiot boy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
necso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
16. What does the British government have to say
(now) about the authenticity (of the contents) of the minutes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
18. Can he give
Edited on Sun Jun-05-05 01:24 PM by FreedomAngel82
the name's of all who has looked at it? He just said "people". He didn't mention who. For all we know it wasn't anybody. Oh and if he tried to avoid war why didn't he let the UN people finish their search? Why did he deny them a few more months? Why didn't he properly prepare for this so-called war with proper armor for the troops? That's such shit. He was already talking about it in 1999. I've even heard as early as 1998.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oregonjen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. It's like Faux's "Some people say..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #18
36. Speaking of the UN & trying to avoid the war
...there is this little gem:

http://www.newsday.com/news/politics/wire/sns-ap-bolton-un-firing,0,7826877.story?page=2&coll=sns-ap-politics-headlines

This is the article from Newsday about how Bolton (yes, the nomination process will begin again this week) went to the UN and illegally had the Ambassador from Brazil fired because that Ambassador wanted more weapons inspections in the lead up to the war.

I just love how this is all coming together :)


Melman's sniveling attempt to deflect the truth was not very successful, and Russerts response to him gives hope.


We may just have them by the nuts, Freedom Angel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
19. The DSM is not a "report" ...
it is the minutes from the British Prime Minister's meeting. It isn't information that was found through an investigation of the lead-up to the war - the minutes were transcribed on July 23, 2002 as the meeting was taking place! This guy is questioning the authenticity of the minutes from a British government meeting? :eyes:

By the way ... when did the 911 Commission look at it? I thought it was confidential up until a few weeeks ago when the British government released it. :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. good points, BD
your'e sharp!!!!! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. I wondered the same thing. I had to go put my boots on to finish reading
because Mehlman is so full of sh*t. The 911 Commission reviewed this report??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
20. discredited as they did with newsweek and abuse of qu'ran
Edited on Sun Jun-05-05 01:24 PM by seabeyond
that blew up in bush's face
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 01:37 PM
Original message
Incredible. Their defense of the lack of planning is
Well, it's better than Bush I's war, when the dams were breached and the oil fields burned.

Wonder how Poppy feels about that spin?

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
25. I didn't watch MTP.On a good day Mehlman makes me want to puke.
However, after reading this post, I'll have to catch the replay tonight. As for the DSM, the average American does not know about it. And how could they? The MSM is too busy with the missing Alabama girl and Michael Jackson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
26. video is up, you guys
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Thanks so much!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cry baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #26
40. Thank you, CatWoman!
Was surprised at Russert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
27. He's re-writing history!
"...the intelligence of the United Nations, the intelligence all over the world said that there were weapons of mass destruction present in Iraq."
No, France, Russia, and Germany all said the US and British intel was wrong, and the UN Inspectors said there WERE no WMD.
We can't let him get away with that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. Here we go...
U.S. Allies Were Not Persuaded By U.S. Assertions on Iraq WMD
http://www.isis-online.org/publications/iraq/usallieswmd.html

Russia dismissed the claims as a part of a "propaganda furor."

French spies said that the Iraqi nuclear threat claimed by the United States was a "phony threat."

I've heard them say this "the whole world thought he had WMD" crap before, and we need to nip it, nip it, nip it in the bud!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
30. Mr. Mehlman, you are an f'ing liar
"I believe that the findings of the report, the fact that the intelligence was somehow fixed have been totally discredited by everyone who's looked at it."

My ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joanski0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
31. On Wolf Blitzer's highlights of the Sunday
morning talk shows, his highlight of Meet the Press was Mehlman being nice about what Howard Dean said about Republicans. Then Wolf showed Joe Biden saying "Dean doesn't speak for me".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
33. I find this interchange to be very revealing....
"MR. RUSSERT: I don't believe that the authenticity of this report has been discredited.

MR. MEHLMAN: I believe that the findings of the report, the fact that the intelligence was somehow fixed have been totally discredited by everyone who's looked at it."


NOTE that Mr. Mehlman does NOT question the authenticity of the 'report', only the findings (and he disputes those in a totally ridiculous way)....so...that says to me they cannot dispute the authenticity in any way. That means BIG trouble for them, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
35. Maybe he could name one?
And that would be a start at least...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
38. the minutes also support what Paul O'Neill and Richard Clarke said:
Iraq was a target from the beginning of the Bush Administration and Sept 11 gave them an excuse to go forward with their plan.

Hell, the "Axis of Evil" State of the Union was the tip off. Wolfowitz later indicated in a Vanity Fair interview that they agreed that WMD was the reason they'd give for the war. They ignored intel that didn't support their agenda and used the OSP in the Pentagon to twist, manufacture and promote "intel" that did. The Niger letter, the aluminum tubes, etc.

The DSM only confirms and provides another view of what we could already see for ourselves. The Bush Administration's lies were discredited before the DSM was released. The Bushies loved the Brits info when they came out with their bogus "40 minutes to launch" Iraq BS, but now leaks of internal Brit gov't assessments of what the Bush Admin was doing is another matter of course since it shows what we already knew: they lied and manipulated the public into supporting a war of aggression.

And there's a CIA report that suggests that we and the world are less safe as a result of the war in Iraq, so Mehlman promotes the Bush Admin lies again:

washingtonpost.com
Iraq New Terror Breeding Ground
War Created Haven, CIA Advisers Report

By Dana Priest
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, January 14, 2005; Page A01

Iraq has replaced Afghanistan as the training ground for the next generation of "professionalized" terrorists, according to a report released yesterday by the National Intelligence Council, the CIA director's think tank.

Iraq provides terrorists with "a training ground, a recruitment ground, the opportunity for enhancing technical skills," said David B. Low, the national intelligence officer for transnational threats. "There is even, under the best scenario, over time, the likelihood that some of the jihadists who are not killed there will, in a sense, go home, wherever home is, and will therefore disperse to various other countries."

Low's comments came during a rare briefing by the council on its new report on long-term global trends. It took a year to produce and includes the analysis of 1,000 U.S. and foreign experts. Within the 119-page report is an evaluation of Iraq's new role as a breeding ground for Islamic terrorists.

President Bush has frequently described the Iraq war as an integral part of U.S. efforts to combat terrorism. But the council's report suggests the conflict has also helped terrorists by creating a haven for them in the chaos of war. http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A7460-2005Jan13%20¬Found=true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
39. Newsmax: Russert Grills Mehlman on Impeach Memo (The RW spin is on)
Thanks to sabra in LBN here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=1524978#1525314



Link: http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/6/5/134215.shtml

Sunday, June 5, 2005 1:40 p.m. EDT
Russert Grills Mehlman on Impeach Memo

"Meet the Press" host Tim Russert became the first network newsman on Sunday to cover a British memo touted by crackpot Democrats as smoking gun evidence that President Bush committed impeachable crimes.

During an interview with Republican National Committee chairman Ken Mehlman, NBC's Washington bureau chief repeatedly asked about the Downing Street Memo, which alleges that Bush fabricated intelligence on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, calling the largely ignored document "now famous."

....

Then the NBC host did his best to make the thirdhand account sound like credible evidence of Bush wrongdoing, telling Mehlman:
"This is July of 2002. We didn't invade until March of 2003. And the prime minister of Great Britain is being told by the head of his intelligence that he went to Washington and believes that a decision had already been made and that the administration was fixing or manipulating the intelligence to support the policy."

....

Mehlman said he disagreed with that assessment, noting:
"The fact is that the intelligence of this country, the intelligence of Britain, the intelligence of the United Nations, the intelligence all over the world said that there were weapons of mass destruction present in Iraq. We knew that Saddam Hussein had used weapons of mass destruction before. We still know that there was a weapons of mass destruction program."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC