Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pope: Gay marriage "fake", "anarchy". Divorce & birth control "dangerous"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 02:45 PM
Original message
Pope: Gay marriage "fake", "anarchy". Divorce & birth control "dangerous"
ROME (Reuters) - Pope Benedict, in his first clear pronouncement on gay marriages since his election, on Monday condemned same-sex unions as fake and expressions of "anarchic freedom" that threatened the future of the family.

The Pope, who was elected in April, also condemned divorce, artificial birth control, trial marriages and free-style unions, saying all of these practices were dangerous for the family.

"Today's various forms of dissolution of marriage, free unions, trial marriages as well as the pseudo-matrimonies between people of the same sex are instead expressions of anarchic freedom which falsely tries to pass itself off as the true liberation of man," he said.

The Pope spoke to families at Rome's St. John's Cathedral on an issue that has become highly controversial around the world, particularly in Europe and the United States.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20050606/wl_nm/pope_gays_dc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aden_nak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Adennak: Roman Catholic Church "archaic", "obsolete"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Pope Benedict "cranky", "dried up" "not DeNazified"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Don't forget "bitter," "reactionary"
And "protector of pedophiles."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Der Blaue Engel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. Shocked!
I am SHOCKED, I tell you! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Breaking news: The pope is a bigoted motherfucker
And the Catholic church who openly harbored criminals is the moral authority of nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. if he was an unbigoted motherfucker, would that be ok then?
at least with his mother?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. Note to Pope: Celebacy Is a Perversion for Perverts in Denial n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. Not exactly the brightest thinker around, is he? Can any of these...
... gay-hating assholes describe a single, tangible way in which marriage fairness "endangers families"?

No, they can't. All their blithering, blustering talk of "family" is just an attempt to pretty-up what they really mean: "I hates them gays."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. I don't think the priests should give communion
to anyone who practices birth control, natural or unnatural. If the Catholic Church is going to be such a stickler on one point, it should be consistent and be a stickler on all points. It is clear that this Pope thinks that the only reason to have sex is to procreate. Therefore, he should take the consequences of his belief, which would be to empty the Catholic Churches of 90% of their members.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. How about no communion for people who vote for people who believe
in the death penalty?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
32. Exactly
I knew a girl who was a conservative and Catholic. She used birth control and still went to church, recieved communion, and considered herself to be a good Catholic.

I wonder what would have happened if she was denied communion because she used birth control?

I bet she would have been pissed.


So, why don't the Catholics really stick to their guns on this?

To me, it is even worse that they enforce the policy on homosexuality while they let things like birth control use and even child molestation slide...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. The World's Most Gaily-Dressed Virgin Speaks
Next, Sister Mary Annunciata will explain to us why penises really are the Fists Of Christ, and, after that, Bishop Fulton J. Fishmarket, the famous blind Bishop, will tell us all about his misadventures with self-abuse, and how it cut short his Army Sharpshooter career.

Damn, but I love it when the pros pontiificate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. GWB had him selected

and he is all that the neocons hoped for -

What a tragedy.

HBO had a special on called "Our Fathers." It was about the pain and suffering of the molested boys by the catholic church priest.

Let him clean up his own kitchen.

Who is he to condemn homosexuals and those that only want to share their life with a love one?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
11. Nothing like a bunch of life-long celibate mysogynists to tell us
about the sanctity of marriage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
13. Pope: Stupid, assinine, irrelevent, impediment to Jesus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
14. Go back to the 12th Century...
Oops...forgot he was already there.

The Catholic CHurch is a non-entity to me anymore. They have managed to drive all the Catholicness out of me I had growing up. Disgusting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
16. So gay marriage is an "anarchic freedom"?
I'm trying to figure out who gets married to have anarchic freedom. Next he'll be telling us that vows of celibacy are the means of hooking up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Montauk6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
17. Hmmm... so let me see if I'm following this...
Melissa Etheridge/Tammy Lynn Michaels: Fake
Liza Minnelli/David Gest: Real

<sarcasm> OK, makes sense to me...

So, has this guy commented on green-card love yet? </sarcasm>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SusanF_CA Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
18. bull!
I have several friends that are married and the gay couples have been together longer than the marrieds. They are every bit a family unit as me and my spouse are. Plus I (personally) have a hard time taking marriage/sex/birth control advice from someone who has no idea or real experiences with this subject matter. Before anyone flames me, I was raised Roman Catholic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
19. But buggering children is okay?
Up yours you paedophile enabler... :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pockets Donating Member (388 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
20. What do you expect?
Not trying to be disrepsectful, but these people have never been laid, so I'm not sure if they are the best to be taking advice from regarding sexual rights and wrongs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. I think they have been laid

and I think there are many that are gay.

I recall reading an article about a Catholic Girl's School in Maryland. When they built a new school there ,they dug up a wall. Inside the wall were remains from the bodies of many babies, yet unborn.

I am sure that the nuns didn't get pregnant by themselves. Nor do I believe that the students were capable of burying their unborns there.

It is their hypocrisy that sorrows me.
What gall!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pockets Donating Member (388 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Wow...
Just goes to show how those who profess morals tend to be the most hypocritical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
23. He can't get his own co-religionists to listen to him --
why should anyone else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
24. He's only right on one thing: divorce
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. I wonder if Bush has plans to outlaw it?
To protect marriage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. how's it dangerous?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. It puts a lot of stress on the kids and the parents
The kids may get split, up, or they might not get to see their other parent, kids might get blamed for it, kids might blame themselves for it. It's a mess.

IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #24
35. In My Humble Opinion, The Way To Mitigate That
Edited on Mon Jun-06-05 08:15 PM by impeachdubya
is to give people MORE options, and MORE freedom not less.

Not everyone should be married- and not everyone is even cut out for lifelong monogamy, either. Me? I'm married- but I waited until I was damn sure it was what I wanted to do, and I wouldn't have made that kind of commitment if I wasn't completely certain I was ready and going into it clear-eyed and with a real good sense of what it entails.

People talk about the "institution" of marriage. In my mind, an institution is something you get locked away in. Not a particularly good way to look at what should be a positive, growing experience.

Divorce isn't the problem, the problem is too many people getting married for the wrong reasons and without thinking. I came from a divorced family, and while it was hard, it would have been far worse if my parents hadn't split. There are very good reasons for many people to get divorced.

The WORST possible thing you can do, I think, is to tell people that the first (and only!) person they want to have sex with is the person they should marry-- and spend the rest of their lives with.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
26. Is anybody shocked by this?
I mean, other than the Catholics who said that poeople had The Pope wrong and that he was going to "surprise" us w/ his compassion?

He's a bigot that's protecting pedophile priests; why would anyone w/ the IQ of a canned ham and over do anything but laugh at his ravings?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
27. If I say he's utterly full of shit, am I "bashing people of faith"?
Because lord knows I don't want to be accused of doing that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MN ChimpH8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
28. What a surprise.
Did anyone expect anything else from Poop Adolf I? Until the Catholic Church cleans its own house of pedophiles and those who cover for them, it has as much credibility in talking about human sexuality as Shaquille O'Neal has in discussing the difficulties of being short and poor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
30. The Pope talks
about anarchy like it's a bad thing. :crazy:

Benevolent anarchy is a good thing, Mr. Pope. People should be allowed to live their lives without being hassled or demonized.

I have been married for 30 years. And we lived together before we were married. Oh Horrors!!!! I am not threated by gay marriage, free unions. My family is doing just fine.

Mz Pip
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
33. wow, a real dynamic "leader," an inspiration to all, spiritually gifted
NOT!

ever onward, papa razzi, fearless leader of homophobes and *cough* "celibate" perverts. people are starving, homeless, suffering--do you have anything for them, or is your regime all about what NOT to do with our private lives? will you continue on this course of irrelevance to what truly matters?

who would jesus hate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatholicEdHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Check out this page
it is from the ultra-ultra-tradionalist part of the Church. They want what the call the "nuclear" option, which is to purge ALL "unorthodox" thinking, shrink the church drastically to make it more idologically "pure" to get rid of the chief scourge of the sex scandle, the "homosexual menace".

They are WAAAAY out there. I was suprised this was even considered. The virulent, enthuistic comments are even more shocking.

http://www.cwnews.com/offtherecord/offtherecord.cfm?task=singledisplay&recnum=2773

"For the sake of argument, let's accept the predictions of the Cassandras at their direst face value, viz., that eliminating gay priests would empty the rectories. Further, let's pretend that we, the faithful, had a say in the matter. Finally, let's oversimplify by reducing the options to two:

Plan A. The Status Quo: Priestly formation -- and parish life generally -- continues as it has been and is presently.

Plan B. The Nuclear Option: After the Passover, only one priest remains per diocese. For the next fifteen years (i.e., until the effects of the reform kick in), you have to drive 35 miles every Sunday and Holy Day to an outdoor football stadium, where you have a bad view of a valid and licit Mass served by unbuggered altar boys, and hear a scarcely audible but orthodox homily, delivered by an ancient priest in a nearly unintelligible Vietnamese accent."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
36. So Why Does The Pope HATE FREEDOM? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
37. WHo's looking forward
to a new New Pope?

New Pope is a failed marketing strategy. Old Pope was showing its age, true, but how this replacement marks any advance over the Old Pope on ice has yet to be explained to either industry analysts or shareholders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. I think "New Pope" is just "Old Pope" in a new container. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. they should bring back Old Pope (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. No, it was hard enough for him to do his job
when he was still alive.

If the organization had been charitable to the man, they would have let him spend his last 5 or so years back in bed at the Vatican watching Iron Chef, instead of wheeling him around the world in that oversized hat.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 03:16 AM
Response to Original message
41. Yeah,
But refusing to let a couple get married because the man is impotent is good for the future of the 'family'?

Facsist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC