Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mediawhores will trot out UK freeper newsies to discredit DSMinutes.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 02:54 PM
Original message
Mediawhores will trot out UK freeper newsies to discredit DSMinutes.
Edited on Mon Jun-06-05 03:20 PM by blm
Martin Walker is one, he works for Moonie Central, UPI.

Sir Jeffery Archer - excuse me, Lord Jeffery Archer, the writer, is a known BushInc type (readTHUG) conservative. He's tight with the Thatcher spawn who was caught engineering that coup. He often uses his literary skills to protect the fascist agenda.

Anyone know other Brit freeper-types we should be aware of, especially over the next week? I wouldn't put it past BushInc to try to push the idea that the UK debunked the report.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. ~"See they are British so they know all about this"
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Exactly. Sad how Americans fall for freeper BS sold with British accents.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. You betcha! Any lyin'
mediawhore they can dredge up.


"Anyone know other Brit freeper-types we should be aware of, especially over the next week? I wouldn't put it past BushInc to try to push the idea that the UK debunked the report."

You mean like they pushed the idea that sadam had "Weapons of Mass Destruction"?

"ST LOUIS POST DISPATCH ***
WMD: Weapons of Mass Deception

Do you remember, lo those many weeks ago, when it was still permissible to ask why our soldiers were dying in Iraq, and to count the civilian casualties, and to follow the money trail? No? If the mainstream press continues down the path that's charted in this late-arriving documentary, the debate that recently galvanized the electorate will become as hard to remember as the tradition of investigative journalism.

Danny Schechter is a former ABC news producer who knows, literally and figuratively, where the bodies are buried. Now working as a "self-embedded" media critic, Schechter turns his lens on the industry itself, specifically how it covered the invasion of Iraq. ....it's still vitally important."



More..
http://www.wmdthefilm.com/mambo/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=48&Itemid=31
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yeah. They used Hitchens alot back then.
Since this DSM is centered in UK, I expect a fullcourt press from British-accented Bushmoonies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Yep
I expect his drunken ass to show up rambling on about the how the "US brought Iraq freedom".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjwmason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. No way they'll use Archer
(It's a minor point but he's actually Lord Archer not Sir Jeffrey.)

He's been convicted of perjury, his name is utterly discredited, and he is a Conservative Party peer - I cannot imagine him being used to support a Labour government by either side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Americans don't know that. They see his name in most bookstores in US.
Edited on Mon Jun-06-05 03:23 PM by blm
They have no idea that he's a con artist thug given cover by his political connections to the fascist rightists in UK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjwmason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Still - he's a convicted criminal who spent time in prison for perjury
Even the ineffectual leadership of the Democratic Party would point that out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Depends on who the news networks book on the shows. I doubt most
of the pundit types they like to use would even know much about Archer other than he's a best-selling writer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjwmason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 04:04 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. That is naive in the extreme
As I say, it is a matter of very open public record that he lied under oath, that he was convicted of it, and that he was sent to prison for it. Given that, there is no way at all that he would be used by the American right.

Also, has it occured to you that he wouldn't want to take part? He's a British Tory, and whilst they tend to support the invasion of Iraq they despise poodle-boy with a vehemence at least equal to that on the left. During the recent election the party leader dropped normal political etiquette and called Blair a liar. Bush is not particularly popular among British Tories either.

Archer's a total non-starter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. I'm not saying *I* don't know Archer's a crook, but America media KEEPS
the public naive about alot of things. I demonstrated in my opening post that I know Archer's a crook of the worst sort.

But, most Americans and even media pundits would only know him as a best-selling author. Naive? DAMN RIGHT, it's naive!! But, that's what we have in America....an under-informed public who regularly get their information from a media that WELCOMES crooks like Liddy, Novak, North, et al, to spew their opinions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tenshi816 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 04:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. Jeffrey Archer?! LOLOLOLOLOL
The man is a congenital liar! Yeah, boy, getting a guy who went to prison for perjury is a really good choice for them to use, isn't it? :sarcasm:

Here's a link to the transcript for the 19 July 2001 BBC Panorama programme about him, Jeffrey Archer: A Life of Lies - http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/static/audio_video/programmes/panorama/transcripts/transcript_19_07_01.txt and another link to the actual BBC News page referring to the programme: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/panorama/archer/1437276.stm

Then again, maybe Archer would be a natural choice, a proven liar called on to help other liars tell lies...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Fun facts about Jeffrey Archer:
Jeffrey Archer unceremoniously plagiarised a story entered by an aspiring writer into a short story competition that he was judging.

One of Jeffrey Archer's former editors described his pre-edited work as "sub-literate".

Jeffrey Archer used to train some of my old school friends in rugby. He would pull hard on their hair to get their attention, and make the half-hour minibus drive to the field without saying a single word to any of them.

My brother crashed a car through Jeffrey Archer's back garden wall.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tenshi816 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Hope your brother wasn't hurt
and that his car insurance didn't skyrocket, but I equally hope he did some devastating damage to the Archers' garden wall.

Another fun Archer fact: His Oxford education he is so fond of boasting about was a post-graduate diploma in Education, and he was admitted in the first place by lying about his undergraduate qualifications.

I think his edited work is sub-literate and have never understood how he sells so many books!

God, I loathe the Archers, her as well as him. Poisonous vipers, they are.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. My brother was fine.
Edited on Tue Jun-07-05 10:04 AM by kiki
Jeffrey's wall wasn't. When I said "through", I meant "through".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. Post in the UK forum, they'll be able to give us plenty of warnings! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. ask them how Blairs party did in the elections
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phoebe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. worth looking at again in case Bush denies Blair
Edited on Mon Jun-06-05 05:15 PM by phoebe
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/07/17/iraq/main563751.shtml

from 2003

snip

In what amounted to a telephone negotiation, a top NSC official, Robert Joseph, told CIA analyst Alan Foley he wanted cite-specific quantities and locations of uranium in the State of the Union. Foley told Joseph that intelligence, which was similar to statements removed from a previous presidential address, shouldn't be used. Joseph, sources say, explained that wouldn't leave much and asked if they could quote from the British report. Foley said that, too, was suspect, but he did finally agree it would be "technically" correct if the NSC laid the claim off on the Brits.

CIA Director George Tenet, though, was not made aware of the discussion, didn't read a draft of the State of the Union and never saw it delivered – he was home asleep at the time.

Mr. Bush didn't respond directly when asked Thursday whether he took responsibility for the now-discredited statement, saying, "I take responsibility for putting troops into action. I take responsibility for making the tough decision to put together a coalition to remove Saddam Hussein."

The president added that American and British intelligence "made a clear and compelling case that Saddam Hussein was a threat to security and peace."

Worth repeating that Bush said "I take responsibility for putting troops in action. I take responsibility for making the tough decision to remove Saddam Hussein."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cats Against Frist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
13. Fucking Brilliant
You have to admit it. They are the most evil geniuses of all time. Someone said, earlier, "right, just because they have an English accent, that means they know everything and they're right."

Exactly, my friend. Exactly, I can almost see Karl Rove's fat fingers dialing the phone to AEI to tell them to get "people with British accents," on every show, because the "Core 'muricans," won't bother to find out that they all work for Rove, Murdoch and the Moonies, and will just think they're "officials" from Britain.

I'll say it, again. WHERE THE FUCK ARE ALL OF OUR EVIL GENIUSES??? ODDS ARE WE HAVE TO HAVE A FEW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC