Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Day 4 of jury deliberations - will Michael Jackson be convicted?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 03:44 PM
Original message
Poll question: Day 4 of jury deliberations - will Michael Jackson be convicted?
What's your take on the length of jury deliberations so far and their impact on the trial?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Who in the Hell cares.
Michael Jackson!! Michael Jackson!!
Runaway Bride!! Runaway Bride!!
Tom Cruise!! Tom Cruise!!
Paris Hilton!! Paris Hilton!!
Terri Schiavo!! Terri Shiavo!!


Blah, blah, blah, blah, Bleagh!!!

Nero fiddled while Rome burned.

The M$M was foaming at the mouth about entertainers while the country was taken over by radicals and turned into a fascist dictatorship.

I'm sick to death of this stuff. Who the fuck cares about Michael Jackson? I wish the jury would turn in their verdict so we could be finished with this garbage.

No vote for me on this because I don't give a damn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. There is insufficient evidence to criminally convict Jackson
Edited on Wed Jun-08-05 04:42 PM by wuushew
If there was then all the civil cases against Catholic priest molesters would also be criminal cases not civil ones.

How does one actually prove molestation of young boys? There is no physical or recorded evidence and since Michael has never been proven guilty of past accusations there is no way to chain a prior pattern of behavior to the current charges.

Murder cases usually include physical evidence like the murder weapon, blood, fingerprints or DNA. When Kobe was accused of rape at least the prosecution had phone, hotel, medical records and semen as evidence. All these things are great for the prosecution to have, yet he still was acquitted. The criminal case against O.J. was from an evidence standpoint also very good. Again the result was acquital. Both of these cases had stronger evidence, so for Jackson to found guilty would be highly inconsistent.

Californians should be ashamed of wasting so much money on a poorly constructed and weak criminal case. Law enforcement has limited resources that should be used to maximize society's utility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. It has been a shabby case since day 1. I believe he's guilty as sin
but, based of the prosecutions case so far, if I were on the jury I'd vote to acquit. If they didn't have a credible case, they should never have started this shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_TN_TITANS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Friggin' waste of time.....
lock him up, throw away key, let inmates do the rest....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC