Deja Q
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-08-05 05:28 PM
Original message |
Why George W Bush doesn't give a damn about homerland security. |
|
Edited on Wed Jun-08-05 05:28 PM by HypnoToad
The military base closures are too obvious.
But as * wants to make the US an isolated country (great job so far), why does he not do anything to bring back jobs that are offshored overseas? I mean, all of those IT servers with sensitive information, surely an enemy could use those?
Corporate america btter be careful with their current friends (India, et al). Make them enemies just like we had with Iran and Iraq and we'll be in deep doo-doo. (BTW, Reagan helped sell weapons to Iran... Iraq too at another point, anything for money of course... nice president, though some idiots still want to believe he was a great one. Which doen't add up. Why sell weapons to countries we knew we would make into enemies later on?)
/rant
|
libertypirate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-08-05 05:30 PM
Response to Original message |
1. It is very simple, when your busy fixing the facts who needs reality. |
ComerPerro
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-08-05 05:31 PM
Response to Original message |
2. My favorite is when conservatives say |
|
"We will put troops on the borders to protect America, that is how Bush is protecting the country"
Ok, one: When the hell is he going to do this?
and, two: Where will he get the troops?
|
Sequoia
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-08-05 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
8. Borders, smorders, that won't help |
|
we have our own homegrown terrorists here.
|
Tux
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-08-05 05:34 PM
Response to Original message |
|
And the need to wag the cock as Republicans need to do for war.
|
InternalDialogue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-08-05 05:38 PM
Response to Original message |
Deja Q
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-08-05 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. Not quite the type of Homerland I meant, but... |
|
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
(I was thinking of Homer S's IQ being comparable to a bunch of people I won't name, but it's nary a DUer! :D )
|
CatWoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-08-05 05:40 PM
Response to Original message |
5. off topic here, but i HAVE to know this |
|
why do you keep posting in breastfeeding threads, equating feeding a hungry child with taking a piss?
both are natural acts, yes. both are necessary natural acts. yes.
but how the hell do you do you equate feeding someone in public with pissing in public?
|
Deja Q
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-08-05 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. Is behind a tree public? |
|
I think it's silly that one natural act is allowed whereas another is not. God made everything for a purpose. Mankind wishes to censor everything out of indoctrined beliefs.
I say mankind needs to be more consistent: Ban 'em both to some closed room or let 'em all do it in public. Behind a tree if necessary.
Of course, I'm also a homosexual male. We're abominations who are supposed to be killed, never mind the little commandment saying "thalt shalt not kill". Meanwhile lesbians get it easy and heterosexuals can go fondle themselves in a shopping mall or romp nekkid in a park all day, moaning and grunting for the entire universe to hear, and not worry about being bludgeoned to death by some crackpot with, you guessed it, more insane indoctrined beliefs.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:51 AM
Response to Original message |