Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Los Alamos,the whistleblower,THE BEATING ... where is the outrage?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Monkie Donating Member (675 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 07:35 AM
Original message
Los Alamos,the whistleblower,THE BEATING ... where is the outrage?
as some of you may have read, last weekend a whistleblower at Los Alamos was badly beaten and told to "keep quiet".He has a broken jaw, a herniated disc in his back, broken teeth, can barely talk and has shoe prints on his face.



he had filed for whistle-blower protection with the Department of Energy over what he says was retaliation for information he provided on alleged financial irregularities at LANL. He also has a lawsuit alleging retaliation pending against the University of California-run lab and was scheduled to testify at a congressional committee hearing later this month.

the NY times has this:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/09/national/09alamos.html
"The F.B.I. says only that the inquiry is continuing. But Peter Stockton, a senior investigator at the Project on Government Oversight, a watchdog group in Washington that is assisting Mr. Hook, has accused the bureau of leaking information to news organizations that paints a different story.

In this version, described in The Sante Fe New Mexican, The Albuquerque Journal and local television stations, Mr. Hook went to the topless bar on Saturday not to meet an informant but because his wife was in Albuquerque that night. He had several drinks. He got a lap dance. When he left the bar, he nearly backed into someone with his car, setting off the fight.

The bouncer got some license plate numbers from cars speeding away"

www.defensetech.org quotes the Albuquerque Journal:
http://www.defensetech.org/archives/001595.html
"But according to a Cheeks dancer, Hook did more than just wait by the bar. "He did get a lap-dance from the waitress," Jeanette McCalip, a dancer who was working at Cheeks on Saturday night, said of the whistle-blower."

The Santa Fe New Mexican has a different version as told by Hook's lawyer:
http://www.freenewmexican.com/news/14582.html
"Rothstein said a private investigator got an entirely different story when he interviewed several Cheeks employees.
"We've had a private investigator who interviewed the manager, the bartender and two security guards," he said. "All four of them confirmed that Tommy sat at the bar, he was drinking light beer, didn't have any interactions with the girls who were dancing there..."
Montoya, the club owner, said Tuesday that law enforcement officers instructed him to not speak about the incident, but he did say Hook probably wouldn't have lived if it weren't for a Cheeks security guard who helped disrupt the fight.

"My security employee did save the guy's life," he said. "

i'm not just outraged at what happened to him,i am also reminded of a 7 part series of articles in the san fransisco bay view last year written by Leuren Moret titled:
UC Regents lose control of nuclear weapons program
Five admirals, Carlyle Group and Rand take over


which details the fight over who controls the weapons of mass destruction programs in the USA and i feel could be relevant to the beating of this whistleblower


more background at:
http://www.sfbayview.com/091504/ucregents091504.shtml
http://www.sfbayview.com/092204/nuclearweapons092204.shtml
http://lanl-the-real-story.blogspot.com/
http://www.defensetech.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bu** republicans have succeeded in turning
America into the APATHETIC nation. Not enough people care to question or fight back. (ranting today, I don't know why?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. being a Patriot is no longer "admirable" according to FAUX
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
complain jane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. What's a lap dance got to do with anything?
Like that's supposed to discredit the guy's story?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. It's about discreditation
The powers that be want to discredit him as a potential witness. He was lured to the club under false pretenses to assault and discredit him.

This is a standard smear tactic that I have first-hand experience with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Trying to make him appear as a deviant
Unworthy of attention and probably untrustworthy too. Fooling around while his wife is out of town. I am getting really pissed about these tactics. And the GD Carlyle Group. Any bets as to whether any arrests are ever made in this case? They are engaging in a wholesale campaign of whistleblower intimidation and at a time when it is apparent these brave souls require greater protection, they are stripping them of what little they have.

btw, I still hate these people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkie Donating Member (675 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. indeed! and a lapdance on the eve of his 30th wedding anniversary
"Susan Hook cried as photographs of her disfigured husband were shown to news reporters. She said today is their 30th wedding anniversary. She said she had to cancel a Hawaiian cruise they had planned to take. When a reporter asked whether her husband could be lying, she said he was not the type to go to bars. "We just aren't dancers or bar people," she said. "And he'd been in bed."

He usually accompanied her to Albuquerque, but he was too tired and overwhelmed with the upcoming hearing, she said. He suffers from a heart condition, and he is recovering from a stroke and shoulder surgery. He had been back to work just three weeks"
http://www.freenewmexican.com/news/14538.html

the lapdance is a distraction,which is probably why he was lured to that type of bar in the first place,i can only imagine the way this would have been spun if he hadnt been so lucky to survive and be able to tell his side of things...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
7. It's all about BIG money
Edited on Thu Jun-09-05 08:36 AM by formercia
Most of the projects that DOE has are run by corporations that are paid enormous sums of money. It's a very insular world because of the security requirements in the nuclear weapons field limit the number of qualified 'bidders' for the contracts.

So, the contractors have their army of thugs that keep anyone from becoming a'problem'. Karen Silkwood is an example of what happens to whistleblowers. Her concerns about safety at the Cimmaron plant that was making plutonium/Uranium fuel pellets for an experimental fast breeder type reactor were well founded and eventially the project was cancelled but it didn't keep her from paying the ultimate price.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC