Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Medical Experts Disagree on Marijuana Ruling

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 09:58 AM
Original message
Medical Experts Disagree on Marijuana Ruling
>>>snip
"I think it's a tragedy that a drug that's apparently safe and is effective as an analgesic, a real pain reliever, isn't available to patients who need it," he said from his home in Malibu, Calif. "The law is totally out of touch with reality -- it's inappropriate, and the result of an uninformed bureaucracy."

>>>>snip
"From a purely medical standpoint, there seems to be ample evidence for efficacy in a variety of symptoms that plague patients or cause distress for patients with a variety of chronic, progressive illnesses," he said. "Also, there's increasing scientific evidence that leads us to understand why the active ingredients -- various cannabinoids -- do have therapeutic value."

>>>>>snip
Next week, the House of Representatives is scheduled to vote on an appropriations bill that would prohibit the Justice Department from spending money to enforce federal drug laws against patients using medical marijuana. While a similar amendment failed last year, 19 Republicans voted for it. The bill was not brought to a vote in the Senate, The New York Times reported Tuesday.

>>>>snip
For Lamers, the Court's decision remains disheartening. "The law must be changed," he said. "I can't support breaking the law and I can't advise others to do it. All I can say is that as a doctor who does an awful lot of work with patients in pain, marijuana is a very effective, safe and relatively inexpensive pain reliever."

http://www.rednova.com/news/health/154574/medical_experts_disagree_on_marijuana_ruling/index.html

It just galls me that so MUCH is wrong with our country, and our leaders spend time worrying about this?
Give me a break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aden_nak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. "relatively inexpensive pain reliever" -- And THAT is why it's illegal.
Edited on Thu Jun-09-05 10:01 AM by aden_nak
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. Exactly. It's OK to prescribe Oxycontin, or any of the other
addictive prescription drugs, but NOT a naturally-occurring remedy. If marijuana had to be produced in a laboratory, we'd probably all have a bottle of it in our medicine cabinet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC