cornermouse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-09-05 03:31 PM
Original message |
|
Stabenow is introducing the next two nominees. She expressed the wish that they return to commity and stability now that they're past the three and have buried the filibuster...
|
Ms. Clio
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-09-05 03:33 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Yes, there are five or six more, aren't there? |
|
Such a sweet deal for the Bushistas.
|
On the Road
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-09-05 03:40 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Wait a Minute, How Many Were Part of the Deal? |
punpirate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-09-05 03:40 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Now that they've affirmed the... |
|
... three truly evil judges, Stabenow is plumping up the next two merely stupid and venal ones, eh?
:freak:
|
OldLeftieLawyer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-09-05 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. While the Democrats remain in the receiving position, |
|
holding onto their socks, perhaps still even believing that they somehow accomplished something positive by not calling Frist's bluff on the filibuster matter.
They SO screwed up.
|
RaleighNCDUer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-09-05 03:49 PM
Response to Original message |
5. And how can we argue against these lesser lights of |
|
jurisprudence when we had agreed to allow the three worst?
When republicans compromise, they take less than everything. When democrats compromise, they withhold from giving that which they can give away later.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:39 PM
Response to Original message |