Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Sensenbrenner's actions amount to "obstruction of justice"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 11:57 AM
Original message
Did Sensenbrenner's actions amount to "obstruction of justice"?
He violated the rules to unilaterally shut down a hearing.

The hearing was for the purpose of recording sworn witness testimony concerning abuses of the unpatriotic act, an act which repeals many of our constitutionally secured civil liberties.

Don't his actions amount to an obstruction of justice?

They certainly amount to a vicious attack on the institution of democracy and to an egregious abuse of power. However, in intentionally preventing sworn witness testimony concerning abuses related to the unpatriotic act, I assert that his actions do amount to an obstruction of justice.

I also assert that his resignation should be immediately demanded!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SeveneightyWhoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Close this thread.
I disagree with its contents, thus, I am out of here. I'm shuttin' this mutha down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southernleftylady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. ,...and there's not one damn thing to stop me!!!
*smirk*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greybnk48 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. you got me!!
my mouth was hanging open when I read your reply. I'm a little slow out of the blocks in (what for me is) the morning. LOL!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LightningFlash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. At the minimum he should be sanctioned....
There was no exscuse for his behavior. And even though detainee abuse is not covered under the patriot act, it does have everything to do with the rules, as evidenced by the baybee memo. Apparently this evidence is disturbing for them and thus not permissable....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. The witnesses included those detained HERE via the unpatriotic act.
Sensenbrenner falsely asserted that the witnesses ONLY had to do with Gitmo. He lied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theshadow Donating Member (618 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. I've suffered under Sensenbrenner's representation....
..... ever since he was my state assemblyman in the late 1960's. I've met him several times. He's a jerk and the best example of a corrupt career politician. That said, nah... it was a lot of things but not obstruction of justice.

By the way, does anyone know what the 'F' stands for? {I know I'm going to regret serving that one up on a silver platter}
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. Ah, rules
Those were fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Back when this was a nation of laws rather than men.
Those were the good ole' days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. i think a lot of the patriot act is unconstitutional
but since the supreme court majority is corrupt and doesnt rule on "law" but ideology I suppose it will just stand until the congress undoes it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
10. sensenbrenner's & any other republican...
which are numerous; found so wantonly circumventing democratic process. should be a no-brainer in that, that is why they are there in the 1st place
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. It would be extremely interesting to discover just how much,....
,...injustice is being concealed or screened by this cabal. An opaque governance is a dictatorship in disguise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. I don't know about obstruction of justice, or how much of a
Edited on Sat Jun-11-05 12:25 PM by EST
moving target that is.
The Little Hitler's helper act didn't play at all well with me. (Surprise, surprise)
I'm glad it played several times, giving lots of opportunity for attitudes to be hardened and the anger level to climax at the flippant, offhand treatment of professional equals. This, of course, illustrates, to me, the case for inside the GOP general knowledge and attitudes that the opposition party should be treated like the vanquished fools the leadership insists (internally) they actually are.

Such disdain has to be the stupidest move of a long history of stupidity or a shrewdly calculated move in a bigger war-impatiently tweaking the nose of the loyal opposition before a national audience.
Something has to bust wide open.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Republican = Facist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeveneightyWhoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Now, now.
Such comments are no different than the "Democrat = Communist" stuff coming from the other side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
15. No
Edited on Sat Jun-11-05 12:47 PM by Jack Rabbit
The purpose of the hearing was legislative, not judicial.

Mr. Sensenbrenner's conduct was inexcusable, but it didn't obstruct justice.

Having said that, it certainly isn't out of line to call for his resignation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC