Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did I miss something?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 12:41 PM
Original message
Did I miss something?
Why did Sensenbrenner shut down the debate? Or is it simply another example of the shameful hypocrisy of the GOP?

The quotes below are from this page at the ACLU site, “Conservative Voices Against the USA Patriot Act” here:

http://www.aclu.org/SafeandFree/SafeandFree.cfm?ID=12632&c=206

and “Conservative Voices Against the USA Patriot Act II” here:

http://www.aclu.org/SafeandFree/SafeandFree.cfm?ID=12634&c=206
=======

Rep. James Sensenbrenner (R-WI), Chair of the House Judiciary Committee ("J. Edgar Hoover Is Back" Washington Times, 6/10/2002)

"The Justice Department has gone too far. … without throwing respect for civil liberties into the trash heap. We don't have to go back to the bad old days when the FBI was spying on people like Martin Luther King."
===

Rep. James Sensenbrenner (R-WI), Chair of the House Judiciary Committee ("Key Republican Not Sure on Patriot Act," Associated Press, 4/16/2003)



"I can’t answer that because the Justice Department has classified as top-secret most of what it’s doing under the Patriot Act. The burden will be on the Justice Department and whomever is attorney general at that time to convince Congress and the president to extend the Patriot Act or modify it. But because of the fact that everything has been classified as top-secret, the public debate is centering on (the act's) onerousness."
===

Rep. James Sensenbrenner (R-WI), Chair of the House Judiciary Committee ("Sensenbrenner vows to uphold sunset of added police powers," Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 4/18/2003)



"That will be done over my dead body."

"If they want the sunset to be repealed, they're going to have to show that Patriot Act One is constitutional and has done good things."
===

Rep. James Sensenbrenner (R-WI), Chair of the House Judiciary Committee (Statement of Chairman Sensenbrenner at House Judiciary Committee Oversight Hearing on the Department of Justice, 6/05/2003)

"As I stressed during legislative consideration of the PATRIOT Act, my support for this legislation is neither perpetual or unconditional. I believe the Department of Justice and Congress must be vigilant toward short-term gains which ultimately may cause long-term harm to the spirit of liberty and equality which animate the American character. We must maintain a fundamental commitment to ensure the protection of Americans while defending the beliefs that make us American. To my mind, the purpose of the PATRIOT Act is to secure our liberties, not undermine them."
===

Rep. James Sensenbrenner (R-WI), Chair of the House Judiciary Committee ("Sensenbrenner not eager to expand subpoena powers," Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 9/16/2003)

:

"I don’t see an urgency involved in any of these things. It will be subject to extensive hearings…Is the judiciary committee going to drop everything on its schedule to do this? The answer is no."

:

Sensenbrenner said he was "particularly troubled" by the subpoena power requested by the administration.

"You can’t in one breath defend (the) Patriot Act, saying (intelligence) warrants are reviewed by a judge, then in the second breath say we'll have administrative subpoenas."
===

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LightningFlash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Like Conyers said.....
Sensenbrenner used to be a reasonable citizen with true government oversight....I fear he was poisoned to death by the cabal and faux news hate speech, to the point where all he can do is the evil stoogework of this corruption. Cheney probably brainwashed him so badly he can't function.

I shudder to think of what else is happening...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. I watched the replay last night
It seemed pretty arbitrary to me. He asked Conyers how much more time was needed and Conyers said four minutes, a minute each for four speakers. Then Sensenbrenner launched into a speech about how all the talk about Gitmo and Abu Ghraib wasn't pertinent to what they were there to talk about, blah, blah, blah. Then he gaveled the meeting closed. Everyone talked at once then, they didn't know what hit them. The mikes were turned off, but they kept going for five or ten more minutes after he left the room. The C-Span mikes must have picked up the sound because I could pretty much hear everything.

It was quite a sight to see and yet another example of their continual abuse of power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. You don't think he was playing to a script?
I really got the impression he was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. well, he definately had an agenda walking in---Conyers implied it was
a hostile tone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knowbody0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. i think it was brain freeze
the Muslim women in the audience were a haunting presence, he sees them as evil doers unworthy of civil rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Seems that way to me
He made those nasty comments in the beginning and let it go on for almost two hours before banging the gavel. It doesn't make any sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. The meeting coincided with Bush's last two days of speeches--sound
bites on how the war on terror is being adided by the Patriot act etc etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. I watched it too
and I wondered if Sensenbrenner's remarks were longer than 4 minutes. Seemed like it. Did anyone time him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. yesterday Sen. said that most people were using the Patrot Act as a
tool to criticize--'in a broad swoop" the bush administration policies and at the end of the meeting he repeated this accusation.

He said that most of the testimy he heard today in the meeting verify's his claim---that what they said/claimed of abuses --do NOT pertain to the Patriot Act (except for the librarians).

He also repeated a few times in the meeting---how the committee has had 9 previous meetings on the Patriot act and no abuses were found.

He asked at the end of the meeting for the Chips.... to submit to the committee the names of librianans who had been unlawfully asked to submit business records---

He and other Repugs on the committee are of the mentality that there are no abuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. to answer your question-based on your post--Sen. does seem to have
a change of heart from a few years ago.

Recall that he is the author of the Real ID Act that will come into play soon (? when). He also pushes for strict immigration policies.

Maybe he is making a deal with Bush??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. has anyone seen any response from Sheila Jackson Lee?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. in the previous 9 meetings only witnesses that supported the PA were
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. oiy. bad link my friend. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. The BFEE must have a seriously
astounding database of dirt on people. Thanks for your responses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
11. because the PATRIOT ACT is up for EXPIRATION and ENABLING
every station is PROMOTING IT right now, even NPR, that 'it's a worthy goal (keep us safe) and hey look, no ones EVER complained' cept for some kooky tinfoilers, teehee

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patty Diana Donating Member (555 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
12. Sensenbrenner Couldn't Handle The Truth!!!
IE Patriot Act Authorized Torture
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC