Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ALL NINE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES RESIGN EN MASSE !

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:19 PM
Original message
ALL NINE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES RESIGN EN MASSE !
For the hell of it, say all nine current Supreme Court Justices announce they are resigning, en masse, effective at the end of this term.

Also for the hell of it, say that you are the lone arbiter of Justice selection and that you alone are asked to appoint their replacements. The Senate will rubberstamp all nine of your appointees.

The U.S. Constitution does not specify qualifications for Supreme Court appointees. Traditionally they are men and women with significant judicial experience, natural-born citizens, and of an approximate age, but you are in charge now and you may follow those criteria or not.

My nine would be:

1 ACLU President NADINE STROSSEN
2 former NY Governor MARIO CUOMO
3 former Baltimore Mayor KURT SCHMOKE
4 ELIZABETH EDWARDS
5 GORE VIDAL
6 former Connecticut Senator LOWELL WEICKER
7 JULIAN BOND
8 BILL MOYERS
9 BARBARA BOXER


If you were at the helm, which nine people would comprise the Court?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Dean is a Doctor, not a Lawyer...
RL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
43. Hi, RetroLounge. You're right, and the traditional criteria
would favor a nominee with judicial / legal experience.

But I learned from the web that the Constitution does not expressly require judicial or legal experience. Nominees winning confirmation have it as a matter of tradition and "evaluative affirmation" and as a political consideration. Same with age and citizen-status.

But it's not expressly required. I did not know that. (Probably my high school history teacher -- who was excellent -- taught me this but I have since lost it as a fact.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
51. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
57. You don't have to be a lawyer to be on the SCOTUS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #57
61. But it sure helps.
I'm just sayin'.

Bake, Esq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
4.  I wouldn't have any trouble AT ALL with Dean on the Court.
god knows we need people with some fire and some smarts on that panel.

Excellent suggestion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
53. Hi Southerntown!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kliljedahl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #53
70. What did Southerntown say?
I have yet to see a comment prior to deletion. DAMN these mods are good.


Keith’s Barbeque Central

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Weicker is a great choice...but
but, i didn't know about the natural born citizen requirement. he was born in Germany, I believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Traditionally, justices have been natural-born citizens
but it is not a Constitutional requirement.

Those are included only as "traditional criteria" and not requirements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. well, the good thing is...
you can say Weicker is a Republican and you're attempting to be "fair & balanced" in your selections, even though Weicker is to the left of Lieberman and pretty liberal overall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'd add Charles Barkley
He's conservative, but smart and funny.

And, yes, he's a diva. Where better but on the court?

Lauren Bacall's too old. Damn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I guess I could go with Barkley on the strengths of his personality
although I wish he were more liberal.

Lauren Bacall? Well, hell, why not? In some ways, she's a lot yonger than some people half her age!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
73. Betty Bacall's a real rock 'em, sock 'em Democrat
She'd make things interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catzies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
59. Actually, Sir Charles has come around. He's becoming populist, and
Edited on Sun Jun-12-05 11:39 AM by catzies
dropping some of the "Screw y'all, I got mine" rhetoric that was his raison d'etre for becoming Republican in the first place.

He's smart, funny, honest, and learns from his previous positions.

From one court to another Court, I say!

Oh, and he admitted to being a pothead back in the day. We could have used him on the court last Monday for sure!

Welcome to DU.

on edit: Great Barley quote:

"You have those over at Fox News, who say they're fair and balanced, and they're lying. We should start our own network, Unbalanced and Unfair, and we'll get the good half of the country."

http://www.clintcam.com/barkley/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwenos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. Big Bill Clinton as Chief Justice
Edited on Sat Jun-11-05 09:26 PM by rwenos
Then:

Maxine Waters
Lawrence Tribe
John Conyers
Me

That's five. Who cares who else.

Edit: Justice #6: Barak Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. He's kind of disbarred right now
Could be problematic.

But, did you know that there is no legal requirement for anyone to be a lawyer in order to sit on the Court?

LIVE IN FEAR, CIVILIANS!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwenos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Big Bill's Suspension was for Five Years
Edited on Sat Jun-11-05 09:29 PM by rwenos
and thus is just about up.

He can apply for reinstatement anytime now. And should. The five years was bullsh*t, even for alleged perjury regarding an immaterial matter in a deposition. In most cases a 90 day suspension would have been about what he'd have gotten.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. That's what I said
But, that's a rather icky thing on his record. Personally, I wouldn't trust him as a Justice. He's been a miserable disappointment these past few years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. rwenos, I think you're on solid ground there.
Someone help me on this who knows officially -- but I think the first Supreme Court only had 5 members.

If that's so, you're home free.

I liked your choices alot. Conyers really does it for me (and makes me embarrassed I left him off of my own list!)

Clinton as Chief Justice? Why not?! He'd be a thoughtful addition to history and besides, it would piss off Rush Limbaugh somethin' fierce!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwenos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. Annoying Fact about Big Bill -- He's a Good Lawyer
I think he's extremely bright, writes well, has a good grasp of federal law, and would pay some attention to Antitrust, Securities Regulation and the Rehnquist BS regarding "states' rights," which should be stuffed in the same hole as the Dred Scott and Plessy v. Ferguson cases.

And he might even find the Fourth Amendment, which the Rehnquist court has clearly misplaced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. One would definitely be Priscilla Owen
8-1
8-1
8-1
8-1
8-1

bwahahahaha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. From your very progressive and forward-looking posts on DU,
I would say your other 8 choices would be excellent, Bluebear, and the 8-1 decisions would probably all have Judge Owen's name beside the "dissenting" column!

Good deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. I jest...
But one thing I will always mourn is Mario Cuomo not being named to the Court. There is a brilliant man with heart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #25
36.  Fully agree.
(I understood about Judge Owen in your post... I liked the way you did it, too.)

Your description of Cuomo -- "a brilliant man with heart" -- is perfect.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. These words needed to be heard again....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cats Against Frist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #36
72. Mario Cuomo is third, only to Thomas Jefferson & Frank Zappa
on my most-admired Americans list. And he would be my Chief Justice:

Chief Justice Mario Cuomo
Bill Clinton
Robert Kennedy Jr.
John Ralston Saul (I know he's Canadian, but screw it.)
Jacques Derrida (I know he's French, but screw it.)
Gore Vidal
Barbara Boxer
Lew Rockwell
Chuck D

I haven't thought this TOTALLY through -- but this is the prelim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #72
76. Looks like a pretty good list to me, Cats Against Frist.
And I really appreciate your comment on Mario Cuomo.

I have a near-religious respect for him. he just strikes me as a magnificent citizen.

Chuck D's also on your list. Maybe his time has come to make a major career shift!

And your including Robert Kennedy Jr. reminds me of how great a citizen he is -- very definitely his father's son and perhaps a more bold personality. Somewhere in the future, when his kids are more grown, I deeply hope to see him run for public office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. Just so's you know ...........
OldLeftieLawyer is in tears right now.

Would that it were so, champ. Would that it were so ............. :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
23.  Hi OldLeftieLawyer.
In tears because you're missing the 9 just-resigned justices? (That can't be!)

In tears because the cat in your signature field has drunk all your beer?

In tears because the current White House resident is going to appoint someone well to the right of Hitler for the next couple of Court appointments?

Hi, there. Nice to see you again, as usual.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. In tears
because the idea of Mario Cuomo on any court is so divine and so impossible and so devoutly to be wished, OldLeftieLawyer gets all choked up.

But, as usual, you start the absolute best threads, my friend. Good to see you, too.

(There is always more beer...............)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. Yes. Mario Cuomo. I'm a devoted minion.
He is a tremendous speaker as well -- there's a kind of fearlessness to what he says in the political arena.

And then to add to my admiration for his political accomplishments, I heard him interviewed on a history-of-baseball program on PBS and he absolutely blew me away.

In a better world than this one, Old Leftie Lawyer, Mario Cuomo would be the Court's Chief.

I LOVED how you spoke of him in your post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Oh, Crusoe
You're a Mario fan. Of course you are.

Anything he speaks or writes is magic. The man embraces words and thoughts the way a lover embraces ......... oh, you know.

His book on Lincoln, by the way, is sublime. It led me to this - http://tinyurl.com/8fv95 - which was a whole other kind of wonderful trip. Check them out.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #34
40.  I might have checked them out anyway, OldLeftieLawyer, but with
your recommendation, it becomes a sure thing.

I will have a look and then report back.

Thank you!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. Good on you, sweetie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #44
46.  No, I didn't see it yet. Thanks for sending it along.
Bluebear knows the secret passwords to all the galaxies of the stars. A true patriot, in the best progressive tradition, if you ask me.

I will contact Bluebear with a thank-you.

(Thanks for the heads-up!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. Some names. How about Clinton? I mean Bill...
I think former NFL star Alan Page has had his name brought up in the past, as well as former Detroit mayor Dennis Archer. Archer was the first African-American to be named head of the bar association, I believe.

I would not take any sitting senators...

Mario Cuomo would be a great choice, as well as Laurence Tribe, but both are a bit older now. How about Bill Clinton?

Elizabeth Edwards is good, but does she still practice law? Is Moyers a lawyer at all?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwenos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
29. Agreed, See Post #7, and Alan Page
would be a great Justice #7, or replacement #6 if Obama doesn't want on.

I'd go to the mat for John Conyers for sure. He'd make a fine justice.

And just about every lawyer under 60 has learned Constitutional Law from Tribe's treatise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
69. Page would be great. One of the most
persuasive souls walking the planet these days. He would be a great Chief Justice, even.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
13. Courtney Love and Gary Coleman n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
28. ruggerson, I'd go with Courtney Love on grounds that she would
make reading the official transcripts of decisions extremely colorful.

I like foul-mouthed, hardlivin' Supreme Court justices, or at least I think I do, if we ever had some.

She'll do just fine.

Gary Coleman? He wasn't on my ... uh... short list.... but he'll do too, especially compared with Scalia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #28
42. Agreed on Love
and Coleman would be worth the price of admission just to see him in the robe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
15. Stipe, Buck, Mills, Berry, Lesh, Weir, Hart, Kreutzmann...
And Clinton.



George, That is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Chief Justice -
Since he's running for the governorship of Texas:

Kinky Friedman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catzies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #15
62. Love your first four - they'd be great!
Mad love for my Athens boys. :loveya:

/end threadjack

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
21. you wouldn't want me to appoint the court.
I'd do something silly like have a lottery, or pick plain old folk. Not lawyers, but patriots all. You know people who know right from wrong, and probably at least half athiests or pagans.

What was that? they don't know the law? Who cares, that's what they have staff for.

Maybe I'd throw in The Rude Pundit, Whoopie Goldberg and Robin Williams too just so people would actually read the opinions.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #21
45.  I might WANT you to appoint the next Court, hootinholler.
A few atheists and pagans wouldn't hurt one iota, IMO.

Jim Dobson might not agree, but if progressive rule the Court, Jim Dobson's sorry ass will NOT be a factor.

Thanks for your post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
22. Aquaman vs. Spiderman -who wins? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #22
33. I'm pro-stem cell research, so I'll go with Peter Parker
--the honor-winning science student.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
24. How about these:
Elliot Spitzer, Eric Holder, Barbara Boxer, Mario Cuomo, Morris Dees, Bill Clinton, John Kerry, Janet Reno, Barak Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #24
55. Hey there, ocelot. How are you? That's a great list.
Morris Dees? Yes! Very good choice, no matter what.

It would be a freer America with people like that on the high court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #55
74. Morris Dees is awesome.
I went to a lecture he gave a couple of years ago -- just knocked me over. He's a real hero, did great work shutting down some of the nastiest white supremacists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #74
80. Yes. I heard him in Ohio and came out of that auditorium feeling
MUCH better about my country.

People like him have already done great things, but I agree with your including im on a list of justices -- let's give people like this every available opportunity to do still more for an even greater number of people.

And he was an engaging speaker too -- I should add that. In substance he was sensational, but his speaking abilities are underrated. I think anybody from 10 to 110 could have heard him and he would have inspired change and thoughtfulness in them.

Ocelot, for the next Court vacancy, you are definitely on the committee to choose replacements!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
30. Why are you creating more meaningless noise?
Why?

There are so many challenges that no one can be bored.

Please, stop creating noise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. You can ignore it if you like... nobody is requiring you to participate.
Some of us are having fun with this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anitar1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
35. I like your list
especially Gore Vidal and Bill Moyers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. Hi, anitar1.
Thank you for saying that. I'm a Moyers fan from the word go -- and would even like to see him run for president. Imagine what he would do to a confused soul like Bill Frist!

Gore Vidal is my kind of American. He has that great hunter's nose for revealing where the truth is. My god I even love his novels. A true progressive mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #37
48. You surely are tripping me out tonight, OC
I'm currently in the middle of this - http://tinyurl.com/9vgzq - and it's making me love him even more than I did before.

This administration has really brought out the hero in Vidal, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
39. I think we need a balance.
I don't want extreme left-wing as much as I don't want extreme right-wing. I would lean liberal majority 5-4 or maybe 6-3 but I don't want a total one-sided anything.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. MrSlayer, that's fair enough.
Edited on Sat Jun-11-05 09:53 PM by Old Crusoe
You offer a considered & thoughtful idea and in the real world, I'd go for it in a minute.

I did put a former Republican, Lowell Weicker, in my list, but you are right to pick up that he is not a very conservative Republican.

Your point on a balanced Court is well taken. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
47. Hard to improve on yours, OC...
I especially like that you have Bill Moyers on there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. Hi, Blue_in_AK -- I just had to put Bill Moyers on the Supreme Court.
I think he is one of the most persuasive people who ever got into public service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #49
52. I have always loved him...
So bright and so compassionate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #52
56. Yes. And there's a great vein of poetry to him, in his words.
He makes the words ring in my head, makes them more than temporary sloganeering.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fricasseed_gourmet_rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
50. a bunch of Chippendales
They could wear, like, nothing under those robes.

But more seriously, I'd put Eliot Spitzer on there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #50
54. I think a lot of people would agree with you on Spitzer.
He's a good man and I have a feeling he'll be the next Governor of New York.

After that? President? or Supreme Court justice?

Sounds pretty good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Coliniere Donating Member (581 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
58. The New Supremes squared
Sheila Jackson Lee, Cynthia McKinney, Maxine Waters, Whoopie Goldberg, Barbara Lee, Barbara Boxer, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Barbra Streisand, and Rosanne Cash.
A new kind of thang.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #58
65. An exciting lineup, to be sure. I like it.
The building itself would have to be fortified to handle all that charisma.

Rosanne Cash!? (A favorite of mine!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
60. interesting challenge
1. Mario Cuomo
2. Jerry Brown
3. Dennis Kucinich
4. Rob Kampia
5. Adida Franklin Jones
6. Barbara Boxer
7. Hillary Clinton
8. DU member: noirblu
9. DU member: Eloriel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #60
66.  Entirely fair and admirable to nominate DU members, sweetheart.
Good for you.

Jerry Brown is on your list -- I considered him also but ran out of spots. He would be terrific. He's someone who has never lost the sense of public service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #60
81. I nominate mopaul!
--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
63. Hmm... Lets thank
Nadine Strossen
Jay Sekulo (ACLJ Founder & Director, throw one bone to the idiots)
Mario Cuomo
Larry Flynt (if he can/will take it)
Charles Ogletree (Harvard Law Prof, contemporary of Cochran)
Alan Dershowitz (Law Prof, first amendment advocate, OJ co-council)
Micheal Moore (Former AG of Mississippi)
Bill Clinton (I've got other plans for Hillary :)
The terry Shivo Judge
One more deserving soul who is a current judge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #63
67. Glad to see you mention Alan Dershowitz.
He's long deserved appointment, IMO. Really like him.

Bill Clinton on the Supreme Court is also an exciting idea. And you're right -- his wife may be holding another job in a couple years...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #67
82. Yea
out of all the ones we're throwing around, I think Alan is probably the most qualified by far. He could be one of the best constiutional lawyers of the last 50 years who isn't on the court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yankeedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
64. The 9 top progressive grads from law school
So we wouldn't have to worry about losing rights for a good sixty years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #64
68. Hi, yankeedem. That would be a group of nine very young appointees
and I love your idea that they would be progressives with MAJOR longevity on the Court.

We could use SEVERAL of them right now, in fact.

I think you've got a good idea on your hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
71. John Dean, Vincent Bugliosi
Yes, -that- John Dean.
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #71
77. karlrschneider, I think you are right to include John Dean.
To me he represents the idea that a Republican -- even a Nixon White House Republican -- can still be an honorable citizen. of course he didn't have much competition in Nixon's den of theives, but I personaly feel I owe John Dean a great debt for his eloquent and persuasive testimony to the Senate (and to the nation) regarding Watergate.

And ever since then, he has been speaking bold truths in times and places where many other people in the collective media have cowered.

The GOP is much-trashed on DUs boards, and rightly so. But there was a time when GOP senators, congressfolks, and so forth were simply conservative, but often moderately so, and Dean seems to be from that tradition. I would prefer a more liberal progressive Democrat to Olympia Snowe, but I GREATLY prefer Snowe to Jeff Sessions, Tom Coburn, Rick Santorum, etc.

I think John Dean is probably appalled at the GOP these days, too.

Very good suggestion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
75. The New PRO-AMERICA Supreme Court:
Edited on Sun Jun-12-05 08:39 PM by AX10
1-John Conyers-D
2-Al Gore-D
3-Pat Leahy-D
4-Bernard Sanders-S
5-Lowell Weicker-R(Chief Justice)
6-Gore Vidal-I
7-James Doyle-D(Governor-Wisconsin)
8-Jon Corzine-D
9-Mario Cuomo-D


I may also extend the court and add two more members:

1-John Conyers-D
2-Al Gore-D
3-Pat Leahy-D
4-Bernard Sanders-S
5-Gore Vidal-I
6-Lowell Weicker-R(Chief Justice)
7-James Doyle-D(Governor-Wisconsin)
8-Jon Corzine-D
9-Mario Cuomo-D
10-Ed Schultz-D
11-Ron Paul-R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #75
78. AX10, I would be delighted to live in your America ANY time.
Solidly progressive and downright uplifting.

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
79. Interesting...
I never thought about this. There are some people I'd like to appoint, but I can't think of them all off hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 04:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC