Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mario Cuomo: "So step aside, Mr. Bush! You've had your parade!"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:49 PM
Original message
Mario Cuomo: "So step aside, Mr. Bush! You've had your parade!"
My friend OldCrusoe brought up the name of Mario Cuomo in another thread. The words Cuomo spoke ... was it only 13 years ago? ... ring as true today as they did then.




Following is the transcript of Ex-Governor of New York State, Mario M. Cuomo's Nominating Speech for Bill Clinton for the Presidency. This speech was delivered at the Democratic National Convention in New York City, NY on July 15, 1992.


Thank you very much, ladies and gentlemen. Tonight, I will have the great privilege and honor of placing before you the name of the next president of the United States of America, Governor Bill Clinton of Arkansas.

It seems to me that it's not a matter of our wanting Bill Clinton. It is much, much more than that. We need Bill Clinton because he is our only hope for change from this nation's current disastrous course. Eight years ago, in San Francisco, some of us tried to convince America that while President Reagan was telling us we were all one "Shining city on a hill," there was another city, were people were struggling, many of them living in pain.

And we tried to tell America that unless we changed policies, unless we expanded opportunity, the deterioration of the other city would spread. Well, we Democrats failed to reach enough Americans with that message, and now the nation has paid an awful price.

We cannot afford to fail again.

The price is too high.

For the first time in their lives, millions of Americans who took for granted the basic right to make a living with one's own hands and mind and heart have been denied the dignity of earning their own bread. Today, a 50-year old father lives nearly in terror at the prospect that if he is laid off now, as so many around him have been, in addition to losing everything else, he will lose his health insurance too.

"What if I'm struck by cancer?

"My God, what about the mortgage?

"What about my son in college?

"And my daughter who's graduating high school?

"How will they get an education?

"And will they find a job even if they get an education"?

How could it have happened? In a country where the executives of companies that fail, the presidents and chairmen of companies that make profits by trading solid American jobs for cheap labor overseas, can make 5 million, 10 million, 15 million dollars a year? How did it happen? How can our middle-class workers be in such terrible jeopardy?

A million children a year leaving school for the mean streets, surrounded by prostitutes and drug dealers, by violence and degradation of all kinds. Some of them growing up familiar with the sound of gunfire before they've even heard an orchestra. Becoming young adults, only to be instructed by the powerful evidence of their surroundings that there is little hope for them, even America. Nearly a whole generation surrendering in despair to drugs, to having children while they're still children, to hopelessness.

How did it happen, here, in the most powerful nation in the world?

It's a terrible tragedy. Not only for our children, but for all of America. They are not my children, perhaps. Perhaps they are not your children, either. But Jesse is right, they are our children. We should love the. That's common sense. Bur even if could choose not to love them, we would still need them to be sound and productive. Because they are the nation's future. It would be bad enough if we could believe this is all the result of a terrible but only a temporary recession. But this, ladies and gentlemen, is more than a recession.

Our economy has been weakened fundamentally by 12 years of conservative Republican supply-side policy. In fact, supply was just another version of the failed Republican dogma of 65 years ago, then called "trickle down," which led to the Great Depression. And it has failed us again.

Think about Supply-side.

Supply-side operated from the naive Republican assumption that if we fed the wealthiest Americans with huge income tax cuts, they would eventually produce "loaves and fishes" for everyone. Instead, it made a small group of our wealthiest Americans wealthier than ever, and left the rest of the country the crumbs from their tables.

Unemployment, Bankruptcies, Economic Stagnation.

Today, as we've heard so many times, a $400 billion annual deficit and a $4 trillion national debt hang like great albatrosses around our nation's neck, strangling our economy, menacing our future. Remember, we became a great nation by making things and selling them to others for their marks and their yen. But today, we buy from Japan and Germany and other nations the things we used to make and sell to them -- automobiles and radios and televisions, clothing -- giving them our dollars for their goods. Then at the end of the year, because we spend more than we collect in reduced taxes, we borrow back those dollars, paying billions more of our dollars in interest, increasing our debt, decreasing our ability to invest in our children, our schools, perpetuating a mad economic cycle that threatens to spin us totally out of control.

In no time at all, we have gone from the greatest seller nation, lender nation, creditor nation, to the world's largest buyer, borrower and debtor nation. And that, ladies and gentlemen, is the legacy of the Bush years; the slowest economic growth for any four-year presidential term since Herbert Hoover. An economy crippled by debt and deficit. The fading of the American Dream. Working-class families sliding back down toward poverty again, deprivation, inexplicable violence. After 12 years, Americans are disillusioned, angry, an fearful. And Americans showed that -- with the quick embrace they gave to the sudden appearance on television of a provocative, wealthy businessman who said he'd like to be president. Before he told anyone what he would do or how he would do it, he uses one word and applause broke out all over America -- the word was "CHANGE."

Of course the American people want change! Of course we want something better than George Bush and the politics of decline, decay and deception. And beginning with this convention, we -- you and I -- must demonstrate to all the American people that change for the better is at hand ... ready, able and eager to serve in the person of, yes, Governor Bill Clinton of Arkansas. And this time, we cannot afford to fail to deliver the message, not just to Democrats but to the whole nation. Because the ship of state is headed for the rocks.

The crew knows it. The passengers know it. Only the captain of the ship, President Bush, appears not to know it. He seems to think that the ship will be saved by the imperceptible undercurrents, directed by the invisible hand of some cyclical economic god, that will gradually move the ship so that at the last moment it will miraculously glide past the rocks.

Well, prayer is always a good idea; but our prayers must be accompanied by good works. We need a captain who understands that, and who will seize the wheel before it's too late. I am here tonight to offer America that new captain with a new course, before it is too late, and he is Governor Bill Clinton of Arkansas.


Bill Clinton understands that a great political party must apply the best of its accumulated wisdom to the new configurations of a changing reality. He cherishes the ideals of justice, liberty and opportunity, fairness and compassion that Robert Kennedy died for. But he knows that these, ideals require new implementations, new ways to provide incentive, to reward achievement, to encourage entrepreneur ship, to develop jobs. Bill Clinton believes, as we all here do, in the first principle of our Democratic commitment; the politics of inclusion, the solemn obligation to create opportunity for all our people. Not just the fit and the fortunate. For the aging factory worker in Pittsburgh; the school child in Atlanta; for the family farmer in Des Moines; the eager immigrants, sweating to take their place alongside of us her in New York City, and in San Francisco.

For all the people, for the bright young businesswoman in Chicago. All the people, from wherever. No matter how recently. Of whatever color, of whatever creed, of whatever sex, of whatever sexual orientation, all of them equal members of the American family, and the neediest of them deserving the most help from the rest of us. That is the fundamental Democratic predicate. Surrender that Democratic principle and we might just as well tear the donkeys from our lapels, pin elephants on instead, and retreat to elegant estates behind ivy-covered walls, where, when they detect a callus on their palms, they conclude it's time to put down their polo mallet.

Bill Clinton believes that the closest thing to a panacea that we have is described by a simple four-letter word: WORK! He has been living that truth all his life. So Bill Clinton believes that what we most need now is to create jobs by investing in the rebuilding of our cities; the shoring up of our agricultural strength; investing to produce well-trained workers, new technologies, safe energy; entrepreneur ship; laying the foundations for economic growth into the next century, with free enterprise for the many, not free enterprise for the few; pulling people off welfare, off unemployment, giving people back their dignity and their confidence.

And unlike the other candidates -- and they all talk about jobs -- Bill Clinton has a solid, intelligent, workable plan to produce these jobs. Presidents Bush disagrees with Bill Clinton. President Bush says we cannot afford to do all that needs to be done. He says we have the will but not the wallet. Bill Clinton knows that we have the wealth available. We have proven it over and over, every time dramatic catastrophes strike.

Remember the savings and loans?

Governors and mayors had gone to Washington -- and I was among them -- to plead for help for education, for job training, for roads and bridges, for drug treatment. "Sorry, there is none," said the President, "We're broke. We have the will but not the wallet."

And we put our heads down.

And then Americans discovered that wealthy bankers, educated in the most exquisite forms of conservative Republican banking, through their incompetence and thievery, and the government's neglect, had stolen or squandered everything in sight!

The world's greatest bank robbery!

And we heard no moralizing about values then from our Republican leaders ... did we?

Instead of castigation, mirablile dictu, all of a sudden, the heavens opened and out of the blue, billions of dollars appeared. Not for children. Not for jobs. Not for drugs treatment or for the ill or for health care. Bu hundreds of billions of dollars to bail out failed savings and loans. Billions for war. Billions for earthquakes if they strike. God forbid, and hurricanes. Bill Clinton asks; If we can do all of this for these spectacular catastrophes when they occur, why can't we find the wealth to respond to the quiet catastrophes that every day oppress the lives of thousands, that destroy our children with drugs?

All the quiet catastrophes that kill thousands with terrible new diseases like AIDS, that deprive our people of the sureness of adequate health care, that stifle our future? Bill Clinton asks the question: Bill Clinton has the answer.

And America needs Bill Clinton, too, because he understands we must deal with what could be, eventually, the most lethal problem of all: a degraded environment. One that kills life in our lakes with acid rain, allows cancer-causing rays to pierce a deteriorated ozone shield and threatens to convert the entire planet into a cosmic hothouse. Bill Clinton made clear how well he understands that, when he announced Senator Al Gore would be the next vice president of the United States of America.

Americanneeds Bill Clinton for still another reason. We need a leader who will stop the Republican attempt, through laws and through the courts, to tell us what god to believe in, and how to apply that god's judgment to our schoolrooms, our bedrooms and our bodies. Bill Clinton knows the course from here past peril to a new era of growth and progress for this nation that will enable us to share our power and our abundance with the world community. He was born and raised with all the personal attributes needed for leadership: God-given intelligence; vitality. And an extraordinary quality of character that allowed him to survive the buffeting and the trauma of a difficult youth.

He was born poor in Hope, Arkansas. Now, the accents were different, even the colors may have been a tint different, but the feelings were the same feelings that many of us experienced on the asphalt streets of some of the nation's great cities; the same pain; the same anguish; the same hopes. He has lived through years of hard challenges since that difficult youth. With each new challenge, he has grown wiser and stronger, as he demonstrated with his remarkable resiliency in the recent bruising Democratic primaries. In the world of fragile and thin-skinned politicians, he was an admirable aberration.

Bill Clinton has always been driven by the desire to lift himself above his own immediate concerns; to give himself to something larger than himself. His entire life has been devoted to helping others through public public service. And for 11 years now, he has been the governor of his beloved state, protecting Arkansas from a federal government that has been depriving the states and cities for over a decade; balancing 11 budgets in a row, doing the things that governors and presidents are supposed to do; enforcing the laws; providing education and opportunities for children and young adults; expanding health care; attracting new jobs; and reaching out to heal wounds caused by 300 years of unfairness and oppression.

He has done it so well that the nation's other governors, both Democratic and Republican, have repeatedly acknowledged him to be a national leader. All this time, Bill Clinton has worked to relieve other people's discomfort because he remembers his own struggle. That's why we need Bill Clinton; because Bill Clinton still remembers. Because he is equipped to break the awful gridlock in Washington and to deliver effective government. Because he will remind this nation that we are too good to make war our most successful enterprise. That's why we need Bill Clinton. We need Bill Clinton because he does not believe that the way to win political support is to pit one group against another.

Bill Clinton does not believe in the cynical political arithmetic that says you can add by subtracting, you can multiply by dividing. He rejects that. Instead he will work to make the whole nation stronger, by bringing people together, showing us our commonality, instructing us in cooperation, making us not a collection of competing special interests, but one great, special family -- the family of America. For all these reasons, we must make Bill Clinton the next president of the Unites States of America.

Ladies and gentlemen, a year ago in this great city, led by our great mayor, Mayor David Dinkins, we had a great parade in New York City to celebrate the return of our armed forces from the Persian Gulf. I am sure you had one, too. But as joyous as those parades were, I'd like to march with you in a different kind of celebration -- one, regrettably, that we cannot hold yet.

I'd like to march with our behind President Bill Clinton through cities and rural villages where all the people have safe streets, affordable housing, and health care when they need it. I want to clap my hands and throw my fists in the air, cheering neighborhoods where children can be children, where they can grow up and get the chance to go to college, and one day own their own home. I want to sing proud songs, happy songs, arm in arm with workers who have a real stake in their company's success; who once again have the assurance that a lifetime of hard work will make life better for their children than it had been for them. I want to march behind President Bill Clinton in a victory parade that sends up fireworks, celebrating the triumph of our technology centers and factories, out-producing and out-selling our overseas competitors. I want to march with you knowing that we are selecting justices to the Supreme Court who are really qualified to be there.

And justices who understand the basic American right of each individual to make his or her own private moral and religious judgments. I want to look around and feel the warmth, the pride, the profound gratitude of knowing that we are making America surer, stronger, and sweeter. I want to shout out our thanks because President Bill Clinton has helped us make the greatest nation in the world better than it's ever been.

So step aside, Mr. Bush!

You've had your parade!

It's time for change! It's time for someone smart enough to know; strong enough to do; sure enough to lead.


The Comeback Kind. A new voice for a new America.

Because I love new York, because I love America, I nominate for the office of the President of the United States, the man from Hope, Arkansas, Governor Bill Clinton!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dems are the finest orators in America. No blah-blah-blah. Just passion.
Passion and everlasting truth.

Thanks. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. And Mario Cuomo stands out even among the best of them.
Edited on Sat Jun-11-05 09:59 PM by BrklynLiberal
Giuliani's only moment of principle in his entire political career was endorsing Cuomo over Pataki for Governor of NY. It was a great disappointment and sad day for NY when Pataki was elected Governor of NY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Cuomo would have been a great Prez
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Yes. I think he might have been a really great one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yes, And Mario Is In A Class By Himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. You know, the Dems have a message it they'd just stick to it
Edited on Sat Jun-11-05 10:05 PM by Gloria
and would stop reinventing the wheel!!!!

"Put People First--for a Change" was the slogan on the card I got when I saw Clinton and Gore at the Meadowlands 2 nights before the 92 Election.
I trotted it out in a piece a wrote for Buzzflash, in which I mused about why they couldn't go back to a version of that 92 message which CERTAINLY applied in 2004!!!!




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. "We have to move right!"
And the more we try to become something we are not the more we lose elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #5
23. yes, every time we go centrist, we mess up the message
Rove knows to "stay on message" and wins with the chimpanzee as a candidate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. Bluebear, you might justifiably be described as a
delivery system for justice and clarity with this thread.

An address by Mario Cuomo is a VERY fine gift to give to DU readers.

Would that Cuomo could hold a higher office. I would vote for him in a heartbeat.

Thank you, thank you, thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. OC, I know that many of our young colleagues never knew 1992
They were young teens, probably unaware of politics as I was at that age. They need to know our heritage as Democrats and my hope is they can have a world in which "9/11 DIDN'T change *everything*" ...that we can get back the country which we knew, which wasn't perfect but somehow always at least tried to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Heroically stated, Bluebear -- and I hope they will read the
post you've offered here on Cuomo.

Our allies would have felt differently about us had he occupied the White House instead of either of the Bushes.

And our history would have been richer.

Let's hope for a Democratic year in 08 and the subsequent appointment of Mario Cuomo to the Supreme Court.

I'm nominating your post for Greatest. You and Mario.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Thanks for that...
To me '06 is ever so much more important. Would that we could at least get the Senate back!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. Here's the article I wrote on the Democratic message....
http://www.zianet.com/insightanalytical/DemMessage91103.htm

A Media Watch Special Report......... September 11, 2003

THE DEMOCRATIC MESSAGE IN 2004: LOOKING BACK TO FIND THE FUTURE

by Gloria R. Lalumia



On August 11, 2003, Former Texas Governor Ann Richards paid a visit to Larry King; a caller asked the following question:



CALLER: We all know that Democratic candidates are reduced to basically soundbytes and ridicule in the media. How can Democrats force attention back to the fact that whether it's the problems with the economy, national security, utility and industrial deregulation are the products of failed regressive Republican Party policies…



RICHARDS: Once our nominee is chosen, the opportunity for getting the message out there is going to be much easier than it is now. Because there's so many candidates it just kind of becomes a clutter. But once that nominee is chosen the biggest problem the Democrats are going to have is choosing a single message and not being all over the place. Because of the Bush record on the economy, on medical care, on education, we have such a wealth of stuff that we can use, that I'm afraid that we're going to get too splayed out and there isn't going to be a concise message. Do you understand? KING: You would make it a one-issue campaign?

RICHARDS: Well, no, you don't do that, but you try to select an issue so that it can encompass more than one or two things and consistently drive that message home

(http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0308/11/lkl.00.html).





********************

Here’s my take on the situation, Ann.



THEN



Think back and remember that by 1992 we had endured 12 years of Republican rule. Reagan had drained the economy and our spirits. The constant hammering on women’s rights, welfare mothers, basically anyone and anything that wasn’t with the right wing program, left many feeling as if they weren’t welcome in their own country. The Right-to-Lifers were unleashed, unions were slammed, and David Stockman told us of the plan to spend like crazy on defense and destroy the safety net. Lebanon was disaster. Then the out-of-touch Poppy Bush came along and dragged us into the 90’s but not before leaving us with the first TV war in Iraq.



Sound familiar? Of course it does, except these days we’re experiencing the same agenda turned up about 100 notches, with a heavy dose of Bush 2’s arrogance and testosterone thrown in for good measure. It’s been a pretty dispiriting couple of years.



But let’s not kid ourselves—the Reagan/Bush 1 years were just as stressful and enervating. By 1992 Democrats and Independents were desperate for air, sick of feeling stifled and worn down.



Then, out of the blue came Bill Clinton. A teacher friend and I took notice. As the primary season unwound, we discovered that not only did we want change…we were hungry for it. A testament to this deep and desperate longing to get rid of the repressive Reagan/Bush 1 years is the fact that I have stored away video cassettes full of Clinton rallies, speeches, and sax playing during the primary and general election campaign. I just taped and taped, hanging on everything Clinton-Gore and saving it just in case we didn’t win the election and I would need some good memories to get through another four years.



The media had not become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Republican Party just yet. Clinton/Gore barnstormed on a bus and the debates were incredible (Perot was too short for his stool and Bush helped by looking at his watch as Clinton prowled the platform.) My friend and I found the energy electric. We went to see Hillary at a campaign stop at Rutgers and we worked the phone banks. Election night we got together at her house, had a pizza, and counted the electoral votes. When it was all over we cried tears of relief. We felt a huge weight lift…after 12 years of tension and frustration, we felt free!



Aside from that memorable election night, the high point of the whole election cycle for us occurred the night before on November 1, 1992 when we went to the Meadowlands in East Rutherford, NJ for the final Clinton/Gore campaign rally. The place was packed to the rafters with supporters and volunteers. The music was loud, the 20,000 hungry could almost taste victory as the candidates appeared and wound up their campaign. It was probably one of the biggest adrenalin rushes of my life.



Of course, in hindsight, we didn’t have much time to enjoy victory because the “hunting of the President” started almost as soon as Clinton was elected. But for a while in 1992, things couldn’t have been better…we were reinvigorated and full of hope as we looked forward.



NOW



Because of that campaign, I don’t think Ann Richards’ worries about the Democrats’ ability to get out a simple and clear message have to become the reality. If Democrats rummage around their campaign memorabilia and think back, they may find they don’t have to reinvent the wheel.



I’ve done some rummaging and I think I’ve found the “single message” that could be the foundation for the 2004 campaign. It’s printed on a souvenir I’ve kept from that incredible election eve rally…a simple card which bears the theme of the Clinton/Gore campaign and subsequent agenda:

“It’s time to PUT PEOPLE FIRST…FOR A CHANGE!”







Why do I think a message similar to the one used in 1992 is perfect for 2004? Well, as I’ve pointed out, we’re now experiencing a replay of the Reagan/Bush 1I years—with a vengeance. Four years of Bush 2I will certainly prove to be as grueling, if not more so, than the 12 years of Reagan/Bush 1. Not only has everything Clinton did to restore the country been undermined, but Bush-Cheney have gone back to finish the job started in the 80’s, even resurrecting the same cast of players to accomplish the final sell-out of the country to corporate interests. PNAC has moved from theory to full operations, with dire ramifications for both domestic and foreign policies. The “compassionate conservatism” mantra of the 2000 Bush campaign—a steal from the ‘92 Clinton/Gore playbook, in my opinion—has turned out to be a hollow manipulation of the original message. Whereas Clinton/Gore tried to follow through on the agenda outlined in their campaign book “Putting People First,” it’s clear that Bush never had any intention to be compassionate about anything.



It’s not my goal to rehash all the destructive policies of the Bush Administration which have worked against the citizens of this country while smoothing the way for business interests. One outrageous rule change follows another. It’s almost impossible to think of even one action that this gang has done for the people of this country. Even on the vital question of security for America, the Bush Administration is coming up short. (“Government's Hobbled Giant – Homeland Security Is Struggling,” Sunday, September 7, 2003 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A36519-2003Sep6.html).



Meanwhile, the campaign promises of a “compassionate conservative” approach to governance have disappeared. In terms of economic policy, large tax cuts to the highest income Americans have resulted in slashes in needed services at the state level and local levels of government. The ranks of the poor are growing. Clean air and water and the condition of the national parks have become low priorities, while the opening of public lands to drilling is proceeding. The EPA has even lied about the air quality following the attack on the World Trade Center. Workers face the loss of overtime pay. If they have their way, hospitals will have the legal right to turn you away from the emergency room if you don’t have insurance. The proposed Medicare drug plan serves the pharmaceutical companies better than recipients. No-bid contractors such as Halliburton exploit close ties to the Administraton and profit in Iraq, while our soldiers have to get by on a couple liters of water a day for drinking and hygiene.



Even Bush supporters supporters are restive as indicated by comments reported in an August 26, 2003 recent article in The New York Times entitled “Compassion' Agenda: A Liability in '04?” by Elisabeth Bumiller (http://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/26/politics/26MEMO.html?hp):

“After three years, he's failed the test," said one prominent early supporter, the Rev. Jim Wallis, leader of Call to Renewal, a network of churches that fights poverty.

Mr. Wallis said Mr. Bush had told him as president-elect that "I don't understand how poor people think," and appealed to him for help by calling himself "a white Republican guy who doesn't get it, but I'd like to." Now, Mr. Wallis said, "his policy has not come even close to matching his words."

In his NYU/MoveOn.org speech on August 7, 2003, which Ann Richards believes Democratic candidates “will read and crib from,” Al Gore touched on the subject of Bush’s “compassionate” agenda, stating that “they also promote the myth that there really is no such thing as the public interest…The test of compassion is action. What the administration offers with one had is the rhetoric of compassion; what it takes away with the other hand are the financial resources necessary to make compassion something more than an empty and fading impression.”



For Americans who swallowed the bitter pill of the 2000 “selection” and have had their worst fears about how the Bush agenda would unfold come true, there’s never been any question that Bush must go in 2004. And the hunger for “regime change at home” will reach a crescendo as the election campaign year goes into full swing.



And now as we enter the election campaign season in earnest, the question on my mind is, who will have the ability to deliver the “single message” that Ann Richards sees as being the key to victory in 2004 and will it harken back to 1992’s theme of making the needs of people a priority?



All the candidates, of course, have their websites up and and running. A quick visit to each reveals that all the Democrats have attractive, serviceable sites with the usual pages dedicated to issues, news, schedules, volunteering, and contributing. Taking a page from Clinton/Gore, John Edwards has written a campaign book (downloadable from his website) which outlines his take on the issues facing the country. But its title, “Real Solutions for America,” doesn’t pack the punch of Clinton’s book titled “Putting People First,” which directly reinforced his campaign’s theme and which “was a useful blueprint that offered a sense of where Clinton was headed.” (Business Week, 9/2/1996, http://www.businessweek.com/1996/36/b34918.htm). (Clinton himself regards this campaign book as a vital part of his 1992 campaign’s success.)



Among the other candidates’ sites, Bob Graham’s site with it’s masthead message “Working for America’ evokes some sort of vague connection to the American people.



The Dean For America website title is also fairly general, but a closer look reveals a theme that is a bit more focused. Under the section for contributions, Dean connects with the visitor by asking him or her to “Help Take Our Country Back.” Even more telling is the fact that of all the nine websites that are up and running, only Dean’s uses the word PEOPLE as a prominent part of his presentation. For example, Dean has been using the term “People-Powered” in his fundraising report announcements (June 30 and July 15, 2003 press releases). And, to top it off, Dean has a logo with a Trumanesque “Give ‘Em Hell Howard” message coupled with the “People-Powered” phrase used to describe his “debate rallies.”





A recent Washington Post article titled “Short-Fused Populist, Breathing Fire at Bush” by Evelyn Nieves (July 6, 2003) depicts Dean “…the Democrats' angry Everyman…” even though “Most Vermonters would say that Dean the Passionate Populist who extols health care and equal rights for all is a Different Dean from the one they know…. Whether it's his message ("You have the power to change this country" is a campaign mantra) or his method, or both, Dean's passionate, bare-fisted pounding at the Washington power structure is obviously working, at least for now”

(http://www.hrc.org/campaigns/2004/candidates/news/dean_washpost070603.asp).



It seems to me that Dean’s whole campaign effort has been very strong on “connecting” with people so far, particularly in his brilliant use of the Internet. But will Dean develop his “People/Powered”/You have the power to change this country” references into a powerful overarching campaign theme that can be as effective as 1992’s “Putting People First—For a Change”?



2004



That bit of musing might have been the final thought in this essay, until I happened across some words of wisdom by none other than Clinton’s 1992 mastermind, James Carville.



In the March 11, 2002 Salon Interview with Joan Walsh, Carville was already commenting on what he saw as strong currents in the Democratic party and the nation and the type of candidate he favored:



Carville: “And I think there's a real hunger in the party, and in the country, for someone who's gonna stand up for them, stand up and fight for something.”

Walsh: Who might that be? Do you have a candidate for 2004?

Carville: You know what? I'm for the person who can stand up and articulate where this party ought to go, who can do it in a tough way, who's not saying something one day and apologizing the next. I'll be for that person. (“Carville on His Candidate: The Salon Interview: James Carville”

(http://www.salon.com/people/feature/2002/03/11/carville/index_np.html?x intro only

http://www.angelfire.com/indie/pearly/htmls/carville-salon.html full text).



Within the last few months Carville has talked in more specific terms about the message such a candidate should deliver. In a July 23, 2003 interview with TomPaine.com, Carville argues that Democrats need a “big issue” in 2004:



‘"If it comes to who is going to get a break, people who make $1 million today or young kids who will make the country tomorrow, you don't even have to look."

And that lead to what Carville said was the big issue for Democrats in '04, what he called the Bush administration's reversal of "the generational promise of America – each time we do what we can do to make the next generation better."

"That promise, today like no other time in our lifetime, is under attack," he said. "The idea that we are a society beyond our own self-interest is under attack. We are told America is best when people are interested in ourselves. We know America is better when we're based on a common interest.

"We have a president that is no longer interested in what happens to the next generation. We have a president that is no longer interested in what happens to the promise of America.”’ (“James Carville's Rx For Democrats,” Steven Rosenfeld, TomPaine.com, July 23, 2003 http://www.tompaine.com/feature2.cfm/ID/8430).



In 1992, “Putting People First” carried with it the idea of reversing years of “losing ground” that many Americans had experienced under Reagan/Bush; Carville’s new twist on “generations” takes the 1992 mantra and connects it to the theme of what the people of this country can expect to leave for their children’s futures. (In my view, Clinton’s signature theme song, “Don’t Stop Thinking About Tomorrow” by Fleetwood Mac was used to rev up anticipation for a Clinton presidency rather than the idea of “generations.”) A message of “the generational promise” seeks to reconnect Americans to a sense of “the greater good” and a positive sense of unity as a nation; it takes the “Putting People First” mantra to a higher level and gives Americans the opportunity to consider a broader purpose when they vote.



At the moment, all of the Democratic candidates are speaking out in mundane terms about working families and ways to address the problems they face. For example, during his September 7th appearance in San Francisco, Dean took on Arnold Schwartzenegger’s statement that he (Schwartzenegger) would not be taking any money from unions because he considers them a ''special interest" group.



Dean looked at the women surrounding him at the podium, and recited their occupations: nurses' aides, food service workers, and physical therapists. "Not exactly special interests," Dean said wryly. "I call them hard working Americans. (“Presidential Hopeful Howard Dean Gets a Big Show of Support in S.F.,” Carla Marinucci, San Francisco Chronicle, September 7, 2003 http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2003/09/07/MN31311.DTL).



BUT…are ANY of the candidates moving beyond this sort of “sub-issue” and broadening the message that can form the “big issue” and inspiration for the 2004 campaign?



Well, yes, but it isn’t one of the frontrunners. At the end of the September 4, 2003 Democratic presidential debate in Albuquerque, Univision’s Maria Elena Salinas queried the candidates on the subject of immigration and amnesty for illegal workers in the U.S. In the last minutes of the discussion, Carol Mosely Braun remarked:



And this election– this election really does pit which direction our country is going to head. Are we going to put ourselves in a position to move forward, to reach out to others, to resolve these issues instead of having people locked up and their phones tapped and their e-mails tapped and locked up in secret arrests and the like?

Instead of doing that, can't we begin to reconcile our relations with others, to work well with others at the international community to begin to restore the kind of hope and optimism that has always characterized this country? Because I believe–if I can finish this–I believe the real issue here is our generation's responsibility to make sure that we leave no less for the next generation than we inherited from the last one. And working together is the only way we're going to be able to that. (http://www.pbs.org/newshour/debate03/part5.html)



There it is, the “big issue.” Hats off to Carol Mosely Braun for putting this idea out there! But, now we’ll have to wait in see if the message gets picked up by any of the other candidates any time soon. And, of course, we’ll have to see if this concept becomes the core of the Democratic national campaign in 2004.



I fervently hope that the Democratic candidate who goes head to head with Bush doesn’t waste valuable time, effort, and money searching for a new playbook when it’s obvious that building on the message of 1992 is the key. I implore the candidates – listen to Carville and, if Braun isn’t the candidate, listen to her!



And, heck, while they’re at it, why shouldn’t they listen to me! “PUT PEOPLE FIRST, NOW…AND FOR THE FUTURE!” – it’s a start and it could be a winner. For, I think most folks believe, just as in 1992, that people have to count in this country – now, in 2004, and for always.



Copyright 2003, Gloria R. Lalumia



HOME
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. "Democrats and Independents were desperate for air"
A brilliant essay Gloria . . . does your last name mean "The light"? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Yes ....moon, light...that sort of thing.....
Edited on Sat Jun-11-05 10:30 PM by Gloria
And thanks so much for your comment....

You know, I think I've spent nearly all my adult voting life feeing "desperate for air" in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. You certainly shed light!
With your essays and your posts here!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
13. Cuomo is a great speaker
and made NY proud as governor. How did we ever go to Pataki from Mario, I'll never figure that one out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
15. This was the line that gave me goosebumps then
And it still does today. God, this man could deliver a speech!

Surrender that Democratic principle and we might just as well tear the donkeys from our lapels, pin elephants on instead, and retreat to elegant estates behind ivy-covered walls, where, when they detect a callus on their palms, they conclude it's time to put down their polo mallet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
17. I was there!!
Cuomo is the absolute best orator we have. Nobody else comes close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
19. This deserves to be on the greatest page. A couple more votes please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
njdemocrat106 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Nominated
If we didn't have Jon Corzine running, I'd ask Mario to move to New Jersey and run for governor :).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
21. Many of Cuomo's speeches have affected me viscerally
He makes me alternately cheer, weep, cry out in anger.

He is easily the clearest speaker we've ever had in my lifetime.

I love the guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
22. Thank you, bluebear.
I :loveya: Mario - I have since the 1984 keynote address - another stunning oration.

http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/cuomo1984dnc.htm

A snip or two from that speech:

Because, the truth is, ladies and gentlemen, that this is how we were warned it would be. President Reagan told us from very the beginning that he believed in a kind of social Darwinism. Survival of the fittest. "Government can't do everything," we were told. "So it should settle for taking care of the strong and hope that economic ambition and charity will do the rest. Make the rich richer -- and what falls from their table will be enough for the middle class and those who are trying desperately to work their way into the middle class."

We Democrats must unite so that the entire nation can unite because surely the Republicans won't bring this country together. Their policies divide the nation - into the lucky and the left-out, into the royalty and the rabble. The Republicans are willing to treat that division as victory. They would cut this nation in half, into those temporarily better off and those worse off than before, and they would call that division recovery.

Now the president has asked us to judge him on whether or not he's fulfilled the promise he made four years ago. I believe that as Democrats, we ought to accept that challenge. And, just for a moment let us consider what he has said and what he's done. Inflation is down since 1980. But not because of the supply- side miracle promised to us by the president. Inflation was reduced the old-fashioned way, with a recession, the worst since 1932. We could have brought inflation down that way. How did he do it? Fifty-five thousand bankruptcies. Two years of massive unemployment. Two hundred thousand farmers and ranchers forced off the land. More homeless than at any time since the Great Depression in 1932. More hungry, in this nation of enormous affluence, the United States of America, more hungry. More poor - most of them women - and he paid one more thing, a nearly $200 billion deficit threatening our future.

And what about foreign policy? They said that they would make us and the whole world safer. They say they have. By creating the largest defense budget in history, one that even they now admit is excessive. By escalating to a frenzy the nuclear arms race. By incendiary rhetoric. By refusing to discuss peace with our enemies. By the loss of 279 young Americans in Lebanon in pursuit of a plan and a policy that no one can find or describe.

(end snip)

The more things change, the more they stay the same. What is it with these repugs? Why do they hate America?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC