Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

IMPEACHMENT PRECEDINGS, WHO STARTS THEM?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:02 PM
Original message
IMPEACHMENT PRECEDINGS, WHO STARTS THEM?
SPECIFICALLY? DOES IT JUST TAKE ANY CONGRESSMEMBER TO BRING IT UP IN SESSION?

I know the "average" American doesn't know about the DSM or really care, but frankly, people didn't care about Watergate, but the Dems got Nixon.

This pre planned war bullshit is the end of the Bush regime if done PERFECTLY. They need Dean to be an attack dog with brains this next 90 days to desimate the Republicans, anyone with a connection to him, please tell him to ride this hard. This is worse than anything. All those dead bodies of Americans and Iraqis, and for what????? A completely planned war for financial, vengeful, and power hungry reasons, based on falsified and fabricated information.

W E M U S T S T A N D T O G E T H E R !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Any Congressman
But it has to get on the Schedule to be presented. That is where we have a problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. A congressman on the floor
Edited on Sun Jun-12-05 12:03 PM by nadinbrzezinski
has to reaad then and introduce them

This has to be first aproved by the rules committee... which is headed by Hot Tub Tom (delay)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Are you serious? It has to be approved by Delay of all people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. oh STOP!
SERIOUSLY????? TOM DELAY?????

This makes me nauseous!

We need a united front, I'm serious. Their is enough evidence to defend a debate on impeachment. This President lied about pre war planning. He is a filthy liar and needs impeached. For that and about 1000 other things, oh, and of course, every death that occurred because of his nation-building revenge for profit fiasco!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LightningFlash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Which is why Tommy Boy DeLay, the great Christian right man....
Needs to have his federal investigation finish up first. :mad: :mad:

Get his ass completely taken off the post, or better yet, with a full public outcry replace DeLay with someone else immediately for any Hearings in congress.

Doubt it can happen though. DeLay is....."DeLayed" in all his wonderful investigations and oops....Look at this web...

http://houseofscandal.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyclezealot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. we need hassle Delay.
How about things like sit ins in his District office..Picket him at public events...Present our 500,000 petitions to him..Lobby his committee and don't back down...Sit in at his committees' members office , district and in DC...Put on a real ad campaign...Have Move On put ads on network tv about the issue, demanding an investigation of the matter..Since the networks won't cover it, we need bring it to the American people...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LightningFlash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Or even better....
Shame him so badly he never will step out of his house again, unless he signs the papers. :evilgrin: :evilgrin: :evilgrin:

His reputation already in the sewers, he could be forced to be removed if everyone lobbies on his doorstep making his lies become frontpage news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. Sorry To Ruin Your Party
How about electing a Democratic majority to the House, so Democrats can make the rules and control the agenda.

Think about this...a gain of 20 seats put John Conyers in the chair of that very committee that would hear and pass out those articles, plus it would put James Sensenbrenner on the outside...where that asshat belongs.

That still wouldn't be enough, but it would enable Democats to launch investigations and put the brakes on this regime's abuses and start force it to be accountable.

Any impeachment would require majorities in both the House and Senate that are beyond the dreams of even the most optimistic strategist. You'd need at least 330 Dems in the House and 60 in the Senate.

While it's fun to dream impeachment, let's try something more constructive and get Democrats elected first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LightningFlash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. Actually that will not be possible....
If you do not raise the impeachment and make it front page, because the country has seen what the DINOs do and these democrats in name only care nothing for these issues.

If they don't raise the impeachments, they'll only tank. Plus on top of that Howard Dean said it all in bold detail.....Either those machines are fixed, or no one is getting elected from either side. Neocons will elect themselves! :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kittenpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
24. okay, that's depressing, I admit. How's that TX attorney doing, btw?
well, 2006 congressionals are more important than ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. They should pull a Rover and rename it,...
,...The Democracy Provisions or somethin' like that so it can get to the floor!!! }(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OrlandoGator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sensenbrenner proved that they don't care about Congressional prodecure.
I doubt it will be allowed to happen, and I doubly doubt that any Democrat has the balls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Waxman had the balls. He already drafted one.
It's more an issue of gaining momentum and forcing some fear into the political lives of Republicans. In other words, as American outrage rises, politicians tend to be more likely to do the right thing. With the DSM spreading like wildfire, the American outrage is increasing!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prodemsouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. No there are some with balls Conyers, others.
Edited on Sun Jun-12-05 12:18 PM by Prodemsouth
Judging by some the post on this thread people really have a lot to learn about the way the government works. It appears many people don't know what it means for a party to have majority in the house or Senate. They don't understand why at this point Bush can't be impeached and why the Dems appear spineless. Some of it is true spineless behavior, but other times it is to help their consituties by not attacking the majority party's people too hard because they control the purse strings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LightningFlash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. "Purses and pocketbooks" ?
How about we forget that and just go all out? Who cares about their "pocketbooks" when this is about the PEOPLE? And it's not just democrats there are lots of republicans who want answers as well....Including in congress, who DO have their own authority....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prodemsouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. Who are the Congessional Republicans who want answers?
Name them. Are you saying money plays no role in the actions of elected officals?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LightningFlash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #22
29. Well this comes to mind.
Congressman Mel Martinez, John Walters, Chuck Hagel, there was a couple of others just speaking up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyclezealot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. we just have to put pressure on committee members
picketing, whatever it takes...lobby with a high profile..Maybe Michael Moore can help us to start our campaign. basically, be visible ..how about start with a march on the capital...think we could muster 100,000 people for starters...Make Downing Street Memos a well known phrase..
don't count on the media to bring this to the public's attention. come on, we can do it..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. AWESOME..
let's get it going... I know Michael Moore would get involved.

I will write him at michael@michaelmoore.com or mmflint@aol.com tonight. You do the same. write me at notevenclosetoperfect@yahoo.com and we'll see if we get any responses. I seriously would march or hold signs that just say Downing Street Memo on corners here in Orlando if anyone would want to do it with me. I'm off Friday. I'm so sick of Bush, let's get this on the front page of DU by nominating it, and get impeachment a more serious discussion, because we've been too DORMANT in our allowance of Bush's antics... seriously. Back in the day, they would have ran over the capital if you know what I mean. Now, I don't believe that is the right thing to do at all, in this case, but a heavy march and picketing will work WONDERS for the sheeple who only pay attention to silly news like who won the Nascar race, did their stocks go up, and who got married/divorced in Hollywood this week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyclezealot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. IF we are serious it is up to us..
Edited on Sun Jun-12-05 12:42 PM by cyclezealot
If not..Might as well let the subject die...It is up to us...Who are potential organizers...Move On I guess..Lets say we picket our Repug member of Congress at their office with signs,sit ins, etc..Can the local press ignore us, if we are noisy enough.?
Don't follow this course..then we are wasting our time, unnecessarily raising our blood pressure...
Come on Michael Moore, we need your inspiration...to rally the troops...Michael Moore, Move On ..Who could stop us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyclezealot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #15
25. good idea..
thanks..I emailed Michael..We await our and his response..thanks..Cyclezealot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyclezealot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
30. as I suggested to Marty..
how about Make Sensebrenner a campaign target..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GetTheRightVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
14. The Democratic Party of Wisconsin have requested Impeachment
proceedings against Bust, Cheney, and Rumsfeld. It is beginning to happen as it should when leaders lie to the public.


:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. did any of the democratic congressman say they would
do anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LightningFlash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Yes. But how many signed on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mahatmakanejeeves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
19. "Dems got Nixon" - Not so
The tide didn't turn against Nixon until Rethuglicans became persuaded that he had done wrong. 1974. When Goldwater began to smell a rat, then things got serious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
20. It's impeachment "proceedings," BTW.
Not sure we want to confuse the freepers any more than necessary. For them, impeachment "precedings" are trivial little things like a horn dog president getting a BJ while on the clock.

Bush's impeachment precedings have to do with screwing up the country's safety, its defenses, its reputation, and its economy. Thus, in the freeper mind, Bush doesn't have the necessary preceedings to be impeached.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panzerfaust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
21. Impeachment?! Is it that no one understands??
The government of the United States was seized by a – relatively – bloodless coup in 2000.

These people are NOT going to be giving up power.

Study history, the Ruling Class has:

Indira Gandhi, the prime minister of India, is found guilty of electoral corruption ... Despite calls for her resignation, Gandhi refused to give up India's top office and later declared martial law ... she ordered India's invasion of Pakistan ... which won her greater popularity and led ... to a landslide victory in ... 1972... In 1975, the High Court ... convicted her of a minor election infraction ... In response, she declared a state of emergency throughout India, imprisoned thousands of political opponents, and restricted personal freedoms in the country... In 1977, long-postponed national elections were held, and Gandhi and her party were swept from office.


They have accomplished the first part, and they are not going to let the second part occur.

Also, do not mistake the Ruling Class with the Republithugs: Kerry is just at home in the backrooms of power as Bush. However, I would have preferred the illusion of democracy under the Democrats, to the overt totalitarianism of the Republithug Regime.

Nearly all men can withstand adversity; If you want to test a man's character, give him power.
~ Abraham Lincoln
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
26. A Congress person has to send in an inquiry...
...to the House Judiciary Committee and they vote on whether or not to let the impeachment proceedings begin. I think that's how it works. Am I right on that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
28. You exhibit a remarkable political instinct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC