|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Brotherjohn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-22-03 04:02 PM Original message |
Gallup... that's GALLUP... has Bush at 50% (47% disapproval)! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brian Sweat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-22-03 04:04 PM Response to Original message |
1. Isn't 47% disapproval kind of high? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-22-03 04:06 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Yes the boy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Merlin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-22-03 04:45 PM Response to Reply #1 |
18. I think these may be some of the highest disapprovals in history. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-22-03 04:05 PM Response to Original message |
2. The comparisons are invalid if you look at the gradients |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DBoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-22-03 04:08 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Both Bush's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brotherjohn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-22-03 04:18 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. I wouldn't say that makes comparisons invalid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-22-03 04:23 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. That's what I meant, the RNC's spokespersons comparison |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-22-03 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
4. it means the "middle ground/no opinion" crowd is starting to dissaprove |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mistertrickster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-22-03 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
7. Bush I lost with 55 approval rating -- Bush II is already below that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brotherjohn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-22-03 04:26 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Not that I don't think Bush is in trouble (I do, very much)... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TacticalPeek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-22-03 04:39 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. The 'reverse honeymoon' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cappurr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-22-03 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
8. What you guys are missing is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brotherjohn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-22-03 04:29 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. I saw that, too! Great news! I just thought I'd limit my post to... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyTiedye (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-22-03 04:39 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. If a stock is performing like that, it's time to dump it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TacticalPeek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-22-03 04:34 PM Response to Original message |
12. Is there a link for the graph? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brotherjohn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-22-03 04:46 PM Response to Reply #12 |
19. See the Pollkatz site. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kanrok (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-22-03 04:36 PM Response to Original message |
13. Freaking fascinating! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brotherjohn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-22-03 04:44 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Tells you a lot about the relative importance of Iran-Contra & MonicaGate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buns_of_Fire (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-22-03 04:45 PM Response to Original message |
17. Very encouraging, BUT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:47 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC