azndndude
(484 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-12-05 01:51 PM
Original message |
Shinnecock Tribes plans lawsuit, seeks most of the Hamptons |
GetTheRightVote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-12-05 01:53 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Way to go, I hope they have the proof for it, poor wealthy people |
|
They could be kicked out of their homes, crying for them all, :sarcasm:
|
Cleita
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-12-05 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
An ancestor of mine found a deed in a Bible to what amounted to a third of Manhattan, when it was New Amersterdam. The story was that when the British took it over and renamed it New York, the displaced Dutch moved to Pennsylvania. After the Revolutionary War, the new American government told the disenfranchised Dutch that they could go reclaim the land the English had taken away from them.
My ancestor never did for some unkown reason but the deed got passed down generation to generation. The ancestor who filed this lawsuit in 1861 was turned down because there was a statute of limitation or some other legal excuse offered to make this go away.
Since the Dutch bought their land from the natives, although the native's concept of land ownership was different than theirs, (the natives thought the Dutch were buying rights to hunt there or so I have been told), the Dutch patroons had a better claim on the land than land that they just took away from the natives.
I'm sure the Hamptons will never be given back to the natives, even though they have a better claim, than a third of Manhattan would be given back to my ancestor.
|
H2O Man
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-12-05 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. They have a much older title. |
|
It is not based on deeds.
|
Cleita
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-12-05 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. Still won't go anywhere. They will find some legal means |
|
of voiding it. With all those super rich people there? You'd better believe they will have a legal team to fight them.
|
H2O Man
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-12-05 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
are actually quite successful. They will not result in evictions, of course, but that's not the idea. A small group of Oneida's won two US Supreme Court cases against the state of New York in the 1980s. I think we could agree that the state is a larger oponent than a wealthy county. Since the Oneida case(s), which set a framework for others, land claim suits do quite well. And the Shinnecocks will have attorneys who are just as capable as their opposition. If Harriet Starleaf Gumbs helped set the groundwork, the Shinnecocks are in a good position.
|
Cleita
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-12-05 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. I hope they pull it off. |
knowbody0
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-12-05 01:59 PM
Response to Original message |
2. this trend is spreading |
|
the Tulalip Tribes in the pacific northwest have notified homeowners that the beach front land they've been leasing for over 30 years will no longer be renewing the leases. it is a beautiful thing.
|
shadowknows69
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-12-05 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Yeah, good luck with that. I'm supportive but pessimistic.
|
karlrschneider
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-12-05 02:01 PM
Response to Original message |
|
(I mean that literally but gotta be realistic) :grr:
|
azndndude
(484 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-12-05 02:05 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Remember "LIBERTY and JUSTICE FOR ALL"????? |
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-12-05 02:11 PM
Response to Original message |
7. EXCELLENT! I hope they win! |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:42 PM
Response to Original message |