Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

are the *'s daughters 'snowflake' babies?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
goddess40 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 02:19 PM
Original message
are the *'s daughters 'snowflake' babies?
No it doesn't have anything to do with what dear old dad was sniffing up his nose. I just read last weeks top ten and number 4 just made me pause and think - * and Laura only have these two children, they aren't identical - could it be?

No I don't believe that embryos are children but that is the reason * is against stem cell research. I just find it extremely hypocritical of someone the feels that in vitro fertilization is OK would be against stem cell research.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's a matter of consistancy
You see if liberal scientists assert something it must be wrong! We should tell him we are in favor of breathing.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nope. Their daughters are fraternal twins and there is
a family resemblance. He's just appeasing the right with this stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kliljedahl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Yeah, but who do you suppose the father is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. I know somebody who saw Jenna at a party once
Let's just say that there is a family resemblance in intelligence as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
27. although, she could just be drinking in the hopes of forgetting!
If I found out my dad was George W., I would be doing everything possible to erase that from my memory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enraged_Ape Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. I don't have a problem with their paternity
Jenna is the spitting image of both of her parents. Barbara not so much, but since they are fraternal twins, I'm sure they were produced from the same night of drunken coke-fueled revelry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. They weren't. It's known that Laura and * had fertility problems.
It's probably because of the partying with alcohol and drugs. Also, Laura is a chain smoker, which lowers a woman's fertility, so although they don't say exactly how the twins were conceived, it seems the in vitro method would be the method that was used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enraged_Ape Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Well, maybe
But that doesn't make them "snowflake babies".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poppet Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Not all IVF embryos
are frozen. Some embryos are transferred fresh without being frozen. It is usually only embryos that are not transferred to the uterus that are frozen. I think if there are alot of embryos, some are transferred and some are frozen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poppet Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. Not all IVF embryos
are frozen. Some embryos are transferred fresh without being frozen. It is usually only embryos that are not transferred to the uterus that are frozen. I think if there are alot of embryos, some are transferred and some are frozen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Didn't know she chain smoked. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. There's a couple of sources, but Kitty Kelly's book the
family mentions it. Look closely at her when she talks and you can see the smoker's pucker wrinkles around her mouth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enraged_Ape Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. That woman smokes like a dang steamship
There have been several sources regarding this. Frankly, if I were married to GWB, I'd be injecting black tar heroin on a regular basis. I have to cut Laura some credit for just settling for Virginia Slims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndreaCG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Don't forget the Xanax!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ripley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. Lol.
Frankly, if I were married to GWB, I'd be injecting black tar heroin on a regular basis.

If I were married to GWB, I would realize I had gone completely psychotically insane and would promptly go on a killing spree or maybe just commit myself to the nearest mental hospital for massive doses of drugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #18
30. "I read, I smoke, and I admire"
Reported quote from Laura Lane Welch, prior to her marriage. Supposedly this was in response to Georgie's battleaxe of a grandmother asking "so what do YOU do?" From what I've read about her, Grandma Bush makes Bar look sweet-tempered and easygoing, and had already driven off at least one of Georgie's girlfriends in tears because she was Jewish and therefore unsuitable for the Bush family.

http://www.laweekly.com/ink/05/05/the-mcdonald.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #18
44. It's illegal to smoke in a federal building.
I hope she smokes in the designated "smoking area" outside the WH.

:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. Several first ladies have been chain smokers ...
Jackie Kennedy, Pat Nixon, Betty Ford and Laura Bush are well-known chain smokers. Of course, no pictures of them smoking were ever allowed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
38. check the lip lines
dead give-away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. Interesting
I've never heard this before. I knew Laura did pot and all that but not about her problems. Now I know why they don't have a lot of kids like other family members.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #20
43. In Kitty Kelly's book she writes that the Bushes were
in a party, party circuit of well-off couples in the oil industry in Houston at the time he lived there. A lot of drinking and drugs were involved according to her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
24. That was pretty early for in vitro.
I think the first in vitro baby was born in 1979.

It's more likely that Laura just had fertility drugs, which also increases the likelihood of twins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #24
42. True because we don't know. However it's not
too early for ivf. My stepdaughter was offered that option in the late seventies as she was having a problem conceiving. She turned it down because she couldn't bring herself to accept that the rest of the blastocysts would be destroyed. Yes, I'm sure years of Catholic school influenced her thinking and it was her choice too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. He's against it because his base is against it. No other reason.
If it weren't for the Jesus people, the PNAC neo-cons would be a very small part of the Republican Party. It's because they can market to the concerns of these fringe religious people that they get the votes to get into power. They also bring the gun rights people and others into their party for votes and contributions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. Exactly
I'm sure he really doesn't give a damn either way. He's just doing what Uncle Karl says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Logansquare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. They're certainly the Bushes' biological daughters
but it has been rumored that Laura underwent fertility treatments before conceiving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. Drop "snow" and you'll have it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'll indulge
The twins are definitely hers...now, as to how they were conceived, I'm not entirely convinced it was in the usual way.

Fraternal twins are not unusual in the least. So them not looking alike means nothing. My mother was a fraternal twin and she and my aunt were very different in looks.

I don't think Shrub has a good grasp on what stem cell research is/what it involves...so I think he has an uninformed opinion.

His brother's wife, Margaret (married to Marvin), can't have kids, so they adopted. I do feel this is why Shrub is big on adoption.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. So why doesn't he ever support adoption in the public eye?
Why just "snow flake" babies? There are already REAL kids who are a live who would like a home. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. Chucklenuts does support adoption in the public eye.
Not to defend him, but do a google. It's not like it hasn't been in the news....it has. You must have missed it.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
31. Didn't * and Laura sign up for adoption ...
... before Laura conceived? This might be another reason why he's pushing that angle -- it's something he can actually identify with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. IIRC they did.
I know he signed some law regarding adoption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
33. Shrub has a grasp on little other than Gannon's pole
but all joking aside, he had a sister die of leukemia at age 3. Why not do the research to save other people's three year olds?

It boggles the mind that these little clumps of cells are worth more to these people than living kids, and adults, and grandmas and grandpas. I really cannot comprehend the moral universe that these people inhabit, I really can't.

Abortion is sad and nobody is for it, but "extra" embryos that will never be children??? You're not killing a little teeny baby, you're killing something with less structural complexity and less capacity for sentience and survival than a diatom, a coral animal, or a fairy shrimp cyst. (As an aside, the Bush administration doesn't give a shit about protecting any of these animals, just clumps of random human cells).

More human life is lost when I fall and scrape my knee.

And I've said it before and I'll say it again, we're only screwing ourselves here. Either the work is done here in the US with American scientists, or it's done overseas, furthering our slide into global irrelevance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. I agree completely
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #33
41. In the Author's Note
Of Robin Cook's book, Seizure, he states:

"The cloned stem cells in theraputic cloning are harvested from the blastocyst stage well before any embryo forms. The fact is that in theraputic cloning, an embryo is never allowed to form and nothing is ever implanted in a uterus."

As far as the conception of the twins, I personally believe, it was in vitro fertilization. In that process, the father does not have to diddle the mother for her to become preggers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. Let's see the DNA results or might that call into question the rest of the
so called "family"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDebug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
14. They are drunks like dad. So he is the dad n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
37. Research suggests
Edited on Sun Jun-12-05 07:54 PM by XemaSab
a biological basis for alcoholism.

On edit: Of course, I'd drink too if that jerk was MY dad.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
22. they weren't trying to conceive when the twins were fertilized
They were in the final stages of the adoption of a baby. They had no luck conceiving a child. They gave up and were adopting. I always wondered what happened to that child -- the one who nearly was theirs. That would make an interesting tabloid story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. I wonder too
Maybe she got concieved and they no longer needed to adopt? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #22
36. with luck, the child was matched with a problem-free dad ...
... and has had a happy loving existence. * didn't give up being "young and irresponsible" until his 40th birthday, long after the twins had been born. This did cause family tension -- Laura threatened to walk out on at least occasion, didn't she? He was still coming home drunk, and even throwing up and passing out, when the twins were toddlers. My guess is that they remember this -- a friend of mine has vivid recollections of being horribly frightened when she came across an unresponsive parent who had been drinking. (We did the math and she couldn't have been much more than 3 at the time ... by comparison the twins were more than 4.5 years old when * announced he was quitting.)

Recall that when * announced he was going to go for the presidency, the twins were opposed. At the time, some people thought they were being selfish about their privacy ... but I think it's quite plausible that they've got a pretty good insight into their father and felt it would be a bad idea.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. Yeah, if you believe he stopped drinking then
I've got a bridge to sell you.

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/bush/bush.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #22
40. yes, they actually had a baby in their home, but sent it back when they
found out Pickles was pregnant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brainshrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
34. I suggest DUers stop using the term "snowflake baby"
I suggest DUers stop using the term "snowflake baby"; The term is an attempt to frame the debate to imply that frozen blastocysts are alive.

The whole stem-cell debate is a thinly-veiled attempt to set a precedent to make abortion illegal.

My own suspicion is that the terms started like this:

http://www.brainshrub.com/snowflake-babies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC