The question simply must be asked

[Must_B_Free]

Does the timing of the manufactured Iraq War in the context of the PNAC published plans for Global Dominance demand a reinvestigation of 911 in terms of also fitting into the PNAC plan previously in the time line as calling for a Pearl Harbor to get the ball rolling.

We see a continual pattern of behavior in the Bush operational strategy to manufacture news items and events to support whatever is being sold.

Most recently it is the capture of the Al Queda "sleeper cell" in Lodi that turns out is as phony as Tim Ridge's terror elevations.

[SouthernDem2004]

1. Who said the Lodi thing was phony? Been out of the loop a few days...

[kittenpants]

3. I read on DU

that the Lodi thing was another case of mistaken identity... you know, all those guys look alike, etc:puke:

[SouthernDem2004]

7. Hmmm, read the Lodi paper and they are still in jail.

<shrug> You can not believe everything you read on DU.

[Vincardog]

2. Bush MIHOP read THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT OMISSIONS AND DISTORTIONS

By David Ray Griffin. Then ask What happened to the follow up investigation Congress promised to do about the way the 'intelligence' was handled by the Mis Administration?

[in_cog_ni_to]

4. It would have to be a new commission.

The last one would NEVER investigate the PNAC angle. Maybe the 911 families should get their own investigators and do an independent investigation? That's the only way any truth will come out, but their access to info would be much more difficult. The Government would make it as difficult as possible for them.

[knowbody0]

5. they are attempting to justify GITMO with

the "sleeper cell"

[stillcool]

6. The biggest crime....ever in our country....

goes the way of the JFK assassination. Investigated by 'cherry-picked' commissioners with ties to oil, is worse than nothing at all. The PNAC is clearly the manifesto for what we are witnessing.

[LunaC]

8. *I* for one certainly think so

But as the author of "PNAC 101" (which presents a damn good case for MIHOP) I'm unquestionably biased.