Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What exactly is a "neoconservative"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
James T. Kirk Donating Member (916 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 02:39 PM
Original message
What exactly is a "neoconservative"?
I know what a conservative is, but what is a neo-conservative? How do the neos differ from the main type?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. neo = new
Edited on Sun Jun-12-05 02:40 PM by wtmusic
as opposed to the old conservatives, like Eisenhower etc. Interesting that that neocons are anything but conservative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
James T. Kirk Donating Member (916 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. So when was the change?
I know Reagan was an "old" conservative and so was G. H. W. Bush. When did the neos come into play?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. They've been in play for a long time
as far as an ideology with William Kristol, Richard Perle and others writing articles back into the 80's.

I don't remember hearing the term before 1997 when the PNAC was founded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. no, Poppy Bush was not an old conservative
back then, they said he wasn't a "real" conservative,
that's why so many of them voted for Perot,
they couldn't bring themselves to re-elect Bush Sr,
but didn't want to vote for Clinton either.

pnac's Statement of Principles is signed by a lot of
people from the Reagan and Bush Sr administrations.
They were pushing these policies back then.

http://newamericancentury.org/statementofprinciples.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's like "new Democrats"--they believe in US hegemony
"one world government", etc.

Soros calls them "American supremacists"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. Here you go:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoconservatism_(United_States)

"Neoconservatism is a somewhat controversial term referring to the political goals and ideology of the "new conservatives" in the United States. The "newness" refers either to being new to American conservatism (sometimes coming from a liberal or socialist background) or to being part of a "new wave" of conservative thought and political organization.

The neoconservatives, often dubbed the neocons by supporters and critics alike, are credited with (or blamed) for influencing U.S. foreign policy, especially under the administrations of Ronald Reagan (1981–1989) and George W. Bush (2001–present). Neoconservatives have often been singled out for criticism by opponents of the 2003 invasion of Iraq, many of whom see this invasion as a neoconservative initiative. Compared to other U.S. conservatives, neoconservatives may be characterized by an aggressive moralist stance on foreign policy, a lesser social conservatism, weaker dedication to a policy of minimal government, and a greater acceptance of the welfare state.

Neoconservatism is a controversial term whose meaning is widely disputed. Most people described as "neoconservatives" are members of the Republican Party. The term is used more often by those who oppose "neoconservative" politics than those who subscribe to them; indeed, many to whom the label is applied reject it. The term is frequently used pejoratively, both by self-described paleoconservatives, who oppose neoconservatism from the right, and by Democratic politicians opposing neoconservatives from the left. Recently, Democratic politicians have used the term to criticize the Republican policies and leaders of the current Bush administration."

-Always go to Wikipedia first... they are very good.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. neoconservatives are also neoliberals
You might think the terms are opposites, but they are not.
Neoliberals are "liberal" in the economic sense of the word,
ie, free-trade, NAFTA, WTO, etc.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoliberal

The term neoliberalism was coined by Conservative Republicans to describe a political-economic philosophy that had major implications for government policies beginning in the 1970s – and increasingly prominent since 1980 – that de-emphasizes or rejects positive government intervention in the economy (that complements private initiative), focusing instead on achieving progress and even social justice by encouraging free-market methods and fewer restrictions on business operations and economic development. Its supporters argue that the net gains for all under free trade, free markets, and capitalism outweigh the costs to the environment and society while detractors to neoliberalism do not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. real conservatives don't trust that the federal government...
...can run even the simplest municipal institutions. Neo-conservatives think the U.S. federal government should run the world. In some ways the term is a real misnomer because neo-conservatism is VERY different from conservatism as an American political movement. I think the term stuck largely because neoconservatism grew out of a radical splinter group of former conservatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. we supplied Saddam with chemicals that killed 300,000 Iranians
Does that count...:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kittenpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. Bat-shit Crazy,
it's the new "conservative."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. here is the BEST discription... by Rep.Ron Paul of TexASS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LondonAmerican Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. indeed it is!
it's hard to beat ron paul, who has got to be one of the best congressmen out there in my opinion.

thanks for the link!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. I'd like to see a discussion of how this compares to Open Society
Edited on Sun Jun-12-05 03:43 PM by Carolab
which is Soros' "answer" to the neoconservatives (and Hillary is a proponent).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_society

Seems to me it's a "bloodless" coup d'etat to establish a one world government (i.e., democracy everywhere) but does not advocate U.S. hegemony necessarily. It's a counter to the "might makes right" argument of the neoconservatives.

A discussion of New Democrats from the DU:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=326015&mesg_id=326015
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. Benito Mussolini
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. actually The NEOCON's are based on Machiavelli and Strauss..
Edited on Sun Jun-12-05 03:15 PM by sam sarrha
It was Benito Mussolini who ho said...'Fascism would be more acurately discribed as Corporatism, for it is the governments relationship with corporations that is the basis of Fascism'

you can get a better idea of Facism at

http://www.indybay.org/print.php?id=1719333
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. They are basically corporate imperialists.
They support global domination through corporate control utilizing military force when the corporateers are unable to bribe governments.

IOW, they are basically fascists, just on a global scale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LondonAmerican Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
11. they're mainly ex-troskyites
and their offspring who were active in the democratic party in the 50s and 60s who moved right as the 60s progressed. one of them described himself as a 'liberal who has been mugged by reality.' they pretty much exemplify the kind of east coast cold-war corporate liberalism that had large parts of the democratic party in its sway until the end of the 60s and have taken the same midset with them in their move to the republicans.

so, unlike traditional conservatives and libertarians, they tend not to have any issues with an activist federal government; they also tend to view the world in much more ideological terms (probably a trot holdover) -- hence their campaigns for 'global democratic revolution' which has much more in common with trotsky's way of thinking than, say, russel kirk's or murray rothbard's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. Look up PNAC
Those are Neo-Conservatives.


They are also 98% of this MIS-administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yankeedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
16. The first NeoCon was one of us
Henry "Scoop" Jackson of Washington. Here is an excellent article about him and his young aides, who grew up to be PNAC signatories.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2001834779_jackson12m.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
20. Someone with multiple college degrees, money, an impressive vocabulary...
Edited on Sun Jun-12-05 03:52 PM by Zenlitened

... and absolutely NO IDEA of how the real world works.

"They'll greet us with flowers." It would be :rofl: if it wasn't so :cry: .

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC