Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What do you consider "Executive Experience?"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:18 PM
Original message
What do you consider "Executive Experience?"
Edited on Sun Jun-12-05 07:18 PM by Sparkly
I often see people say a presidential candidate should have "executive experience," but I'm not sure what's meant by that.

As an adjective, M-W defines "executive" as:
1 a : of or relating to the execution of the laws and the conduct of public and national affairs b : belonging to the branch of government that is charged with such powers as diplomatic representation, superintendence of the execution of the laws, and appointment of officials and that usually has some power over legislation (as through veto) -- compare JUDICIAL, LEGISLATIVE
2 a : designed for or relating to execution or carrying into effect <executive board> b : having administrative or managerial responsibility <executive director>
3 : of or relating to an executive <the executive offices>

http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary

Is being a legislator "executive experience?"
Is being an executive director of an organization "executive experience?"
Is being a business executive or manager "executive experience?"

What is learned from "executive experience," and what would be the risks associated with a president without it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NorCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. A president without "executive experience"
would pose no risk to this country whatsoever, except perhaps for being unaware of how to write legislation/bills and the inner-workings of congress. Of course, a cabinet could easily be put together that would eliminate these concerns for a rookie pres. The only reason people talk so much about experience is because it brain washes people into voting for the incumbent, not a fresh new face with new ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yes, that could happen
but I'm not sure how all "executive experience" imparts knowledge of the legislative process, nor how the legislative process imparts "executive experience."

I think it would be a bad thing to have a president who doesn't understand how Congress works (I think we have one now who doesn't understand how *ANYthing* works), but I think there are many ways to learn that, and many people with deep understanding and great minds who haven't necessarily worked as legislators or "executives."

I agree with you -- it's a term that seems to be used to exclude people who haven't gone through the traditional "President School" routes, somehow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. hi Sparkly
:hi:

to me it means having experience at delegating and being able to oversee what's been delegated effectively.

I don't think being a Senator is "executive experience" unless he has it somewhere else in his background.

Clark has it from running NATO
Dean has it from being Governor
Kerry had it way back when in the DA's office
Hillary? Perhaps as First Lady she got some and perhaps in her old law firm, but I don't know......


That's my take anyway, I'll read with interest your other responses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. That makes sense.
Delegating, overseeing... Could be management, perhaps?

Would being a teacher be "executive experience," or cover the same ground in terms of learned or proven skills?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. i don't think so unless they led a large research group n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jai4WKC08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I once heard...
Clark said teachers are first and foremost leaders (or words to that effect).

So in that sense, I think they do have executive experience. They supervise, they manage resources, they train "subordinates," they get tasks accomplished, they take care of people. In other words, they lead.

I suppose in that sense, most elected officials do as well. The difference is the scope of their leadership. A member of congress, for example, leads a relatively small congressional staff. A somewhat larger staff if he or she heads a committee. And of course a campaign staff, if only for a short period of time.

But it's nothing to compare with the size and scope of organization that a governor runs. Or the executive of a large corporation. Or a Supreme Allied Commander for that matter.

Members of Congress bear great responsibility (or can if they choose not to shirk it) for their role in the governance of the nation. But they do not, with small exception, exercise executive responsibility because they are not responsible for the actions of people other than themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. High School Class President
That's first class "executive experience" right there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC