Postman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-13-05 03:10 PM
Original message |
Jackson coverage today eclipses Conyers DSM hearing Thursday?? |
|
Edited on Mon Jun-13-05 03:11 PM by Postman
what do you think?
|
NYCGirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-13-05 03:11 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Nevermind. I see you edited your subject line. NT |
|
Edited on Mon Jun-13-05 03:12 PM by NYCGirl
|
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-13-05 03:14 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I'm glad the verdict is in. Hopefully the dust will have |
tinrobot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-13-05 03:15 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Only if he's guilty... |
|
...and tries to do something stupid like run for it or take a hostage.
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-13-05 03:15 PM
Response to Original message |
4. No. I think it will be not guilty |
|
and that will be the end of it. No fodder, no story.
However, if he's found guilty, we are looking at a week of bullshit, sensationalized coverage. :(
I don't know how much coverage the Conyers hearing would get in the MSM anyway. VERY little....IMCPO
|
damntexdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-13-05 03:28 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Wait a minute? What happened? |
|
The damn jury is announcing its verdict three days early!
OK, who messed up the timing on this one? That's it: red alert on Thursday!
|
retread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-13-05 03:52 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Wait a minute! Michael Jackson is on trial for something??? n/t |
|
Edited on Mon Jun-13-05 03:52 PM by retread
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:18 PM
Response to Original message |