Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Michal Jackson found not guilty

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Shrubhater Donating Member (884 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 05:39 PM
Original message
Michal Jackson found not guilty
Edited on Mon Jun-13-05 06:17 PM by Shrubhater
After hours of jury deliberation, and a large defense effort, jurors sided with the defense and found him not guilty of the child molestation charges he faced. The defense painted the picture of a 46 year-old man who loves children, and not a molester, as the prosecution said. This was the most covered celebrity trial in history.(the last sentence I'm not sure of)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dupe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moobu2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Dupe, Dupe, Dupe, Dupe etc...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shrubhater Donating Member (884 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. WTF?
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shrubhater Donating Member (884 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. What the heck are you talking about?
:wtf: :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shrubhater Donating Member (884 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. WTF?
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. No, OJ was
24/7 live feed from the court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldtime dfl_er Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. the persecution?
LOL! Even if that's just a typo, it's pretty damn funny.

http://www.cafepress.com/scarebaby.24202078
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. And maybe true!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaver Tail Donating Member (903 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. OK. He is Not Guilty
Now lets get on wiht getting rid of the real criminals (The Killer B's as I call them).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shrubhater Donating Member (884 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. It was a typo.
Thank you for pointing that out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shrubhater Donating Member (884 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rustydad Donating Member (753 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. by law he was not guilty
If a Santa Maria jury found him not guilty then by law he was not proved guilty, period. Santa Maria is a very conservative ex farm town turned white aspiring to be upper middle class town. Lot's of farm workers still but not on this jury. Tom Sneddon the DA is an out and out bastard. I had a good friend who's mother lived next door to Sneddon years ago when he first was elected DA. His wife and kids would come over when Sneddon would drink himself into a rage and do physical violence on both wife and kids. The police would smooth it over many many times. This should end his career, at least I hope so. Jackson may have been guilty who knows. But Sneddon went after him for personal reasons, not legal reasons. He cost our County a huge amount of money it doesn't have. And one more comment. The parents in this case suck as bad as Sneddon, Jackson, and the shitty press. They all suck. Bob
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RalphReedsWreckedEm Donating Member (142 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
13. Who is this "Michael Jackson" person, anyway?
I keep hearing about him, but can't quite put a face to the name. Can't say I know who you're referring to...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC