Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wow, The DSM's got the Right trying to pull a Clinton...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 01:34 PM
Original message
Wow, The DSM's got the Right trying to pull a Clinton...
(I may still have fans from over there, so be civil. (not nice)

But I couldn't help having a look-see at some 'Conservative' sites and I came across several wingnuts trying to spin the minutes.

The best I've seen so far is how they're trying to redefine the word "fixed".

This is beautiful;

CherylynK Yesterday, 09:37 AM Post #3
Riley-piley!

Group: CS - Gold
Posts: 765
Joined: 9-September 03
Member No.: 4071

QUOTE(pepperonikkid @ Jun 13 2005, 09:21 AM)
'Downing Street' Memo Has Left Wingers Drooling
gopusa.com
Copyright © 2000-2005, GOPUSA.com, Inc.
By Bobby Eberle
June 13, 2005
Excerpt:
"Military action was now seen as inevitable. Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy."

>> Continued -- Page 1 2 3

Full Story"

Am I the only one that reads that "fixed" as in "about a fixed point?" Which renders the whole memo pretty SOP and innocuous.


Noclevermoniker Yesterday, 10:18 AM Post #4

BB-35 USS Texas

Group: CS - Silver
Posts: 918
Joined: 13-November 03
From: Texas, USA
Member No.: 5518

QUOTE(CherylynK @ Jun 13 2005, 09:37 AM)
"Am I the only one that reads that "fixed" as in "about a fixed point?" Which renders the whole memo pretty SOP and innocuous."


Exactly my thoughts. Or, another way "anchored", "arranged", etc. I'm thinking that in Brit-English they'd have chosen another word for "doctored" rather than "fixed". The context seems pretty clear for me, but then, I'm not drooling...


It keeps getting better too, It'll be interesting to see if any of these people wake the fuck up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tallahasseedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. It depends what you believe the meaning is of "is".
Just wait, the excuse and spin train hasnt even left the station. Im fairly confident the wordsmiths are holding meetings as we speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat in Tallahassee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Hi tallahasseedem!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tallahasseedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Hi!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat in Tallahassee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, those English have a different word for everything; it's like
a different language! "Arranged," "around a fixed point," "anchored" what the hell is the different. It was all "anchored, arranged around a fixed point" i.e., it was a lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. Does anyone know if the cover on the DSMinutes is BLUE?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStateGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. They are idiots. If it meant fixed point the memo would not have been
Edited on Tue Jun-14-05 01:50 PM by BlueStateGirl
big deal to the Brits. They would have read it as backing up Tony Blair.

The memo would support his POV and don't you think he would be shouting that to the masses, if it did in fact support the case for war???

It means the same thing in Britain as it means here or it wouldn't have been such an explosive story in Britain.

They are all freaking morons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Revolution Donating Member (497 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. I've seen this excuse before
Trying to claim that "fixed around" means something different in British English (or English English :)). The problem with that is, if it really means something completely innocent, then why was it an issue in recent British elections?

Besides, even if you took that out, this part: "Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action", is still pretty damning, considering he was telling (and continues to tell us) that they only wanted to go to war as a last resort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tallahasseedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Yeah, kind of like wanting a fag.
We cant let them get away with this logic. Removing Sadaam and fixing the facts means the same damn thing in any language. Trying to redefine is because your trying to lie about getting a job is one thing, redefining fix because you started an illegal war in which you planned a few years ahead is another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. It depends on what the meaning of "is" is, right?
Yeah, Condi and a couple of others suddenly are bereft of English language skills, and their sycophants in the media and on line are more than happy to accommodate Dr. Rice's inability to decipher what it could possibly mean when someone says about them that they were fixing the facts and the intelligence in furtherance of their policy, rather than vice versa.

Also lost down the memory hole seems to be the reports out of the intelligence communities that unsatisfactory reports were being returned ("wrong answer, try again") and Powell and Cheney personally went down to Foggy Bottom to be sure that the right "facts" were being developed in furtherance of making the case for invasion.

Odd that the British memos seem aware of the fact that "regime change," one of the ever-shifting rationales promulgated by Chimpy, is actually illegal under international law. The corrupt Bush administration seems to make no such concession anywhere at any time. But as many criminals have found out, ignorance of the law is no excuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. It's a shame these people have so little information...
I wonder if their heads would explode if we finger painted a picture of the timeline of the Office of Special plans relative to the type of intel we were getting.

Think they would try and find a way to explain that one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donkeyotay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. The office created special to stovepipe the intelligence
You mean the OFFICE OF SPECIAL PLANS created to review all the raw intelligence to see if they could come to the right conclusion???

That office? The special one that makes the president look especially like a disassembler when we whines about how he was mislead by bad intell?

Shsss... no one knows about that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracyindanger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. Boneheads. They're all wastes of oxygen.
NO MATTER WHAT DEFINITION YOU CHOOSE FOR "FIXED," THE FACT REMAINS THAT FOR BUSH THE WAR JUSTIFIED THE INTELLIGENCE--THE INTELLIGENCE DIDN'T JUSTIFY THE WAR.

Assholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
12. "OBL determined to strike inside the US"
seemed to strain their linguistic interpretive talents as well.

So no one should be surprised they can't grok the definition of "fixed" in-context.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
13. "I did not have sexual relations with that man
mr bush" - Tony The Poodle Blair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
14. It doesn't change the meaning of the statement at all...
In either case the policy (to go to war) preceded the intelligence and facts. No difference in practical terms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libertypirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
15. Keep the focus off the "being fixed"
"being" is the verb not "fixed"

something that is being fixed is something indended to look as though it was always in it's fixed state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
16. So let's have a Senate hearing and ask the author precisely what he meant.
It seem clear enough to me, but if the Freepers want, they can ask the guy. Oh, they aren't interested? Oh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tex-wyo-dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
17. It really doesn't matter what sense of "fixed" you choose...
when you put it with the words "around the policy" the meaning is pretty clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
19. The important part of them arguing this is that it shows they know...
these minutes are damaging to Bush. The fact that they only have this argument is what's nice for us to see.

My response might be, "So if the word fixed means changed, you would agree that what Bush and Blair did was criminal, or at least damaging?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
20. Bobby Eberle? GOOPUSA? Am I The Only One Noticing This??
As the Pink Floyd song goes..."Welcome To The Machines"...you're seeing the hard core working on the hard core spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC