Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nail It to the White House Door (seeking criticism, critique)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 02:12 PM
Original message
Nail It to the White House Door (seeking criticism, critique)
I've put this together for a release tomorrow, but I am unsure of it. Specifically, I'm wondering if the Martin Luther thing at the beginning fits. Rip this apart for me, please, and help me get it ready. Many, many thanks.

Please hold off on forwarding any of this until tomorrow. It may go through significant changes.

===

Almost five hundred years ago, Martin Luther nailed his Ninety-Five Theses to the door of the Wittenberg Church, initiating a sequence of events which forever altered the geometry of global religion, politics and power. Another document is going to be nailed to another door on Thursday, June 16th. This document is freighted with hard truths, stern demands and nearly a million names. This document, once nailed to its own door, likewise carries with it all the possibilities of change.

Very slowly, and after an embarrassing gap of silence from the news media, the American people have come to hear about the Downing Street Minutes. This document, once confidential but leaked by a British version of Deep Throat, described in plain language the manner in which the Bush and Blair administrations planned to manipulate their way into an invasion of Iraq. The Minutes lay out the fact that intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy of invasion, and that a pretense for war had to be manufactured in order to paint a veneer of legitimacy over what everyone involved knew was a patently illegal military action.

Subsequent secret documents have followed the release of the Downing Street Minutes, further exposing the lies, distortions and moral convolutions put forth by the offices of Bush and Blair in their rush to war. According to these documents, which have been verified as genuine by the British government, the decision to invade Iraq was made as early as April 2002, months before anyone in America or Britain became aware that such an act was even being considered.

This April 2002 decision was made between Bush and Blair at a summit in Crawford, Texas. The fact that the decision to invade had been made so early shatters all the mealy-mouthed protestations of Bush and his people, who spent those months before the attack preaching peace and international cooperation while sharpening their knives behind closed doors.

One document, a briefing paper partnered with the Downing Street Minutes, states bluntly that British officials knew an invasion would be illegal, but had no choice but to figure out a way to frame it as legal, because Bush was going into Iraq no matter what and would use British bases in Cyprus and Diego Garcia to do so. This would make Britain complicit in the invasion even if they decided not to send troops, and so it was “necessary to create the conditions” which would make it legal.

How does one go about creating the conditions for legality? By framing facts and intelligence around the policy, of course. The word ‘Lie’ does not appear in any of the released documents, but the need to lie, the decision to lie, in order to justify war permeates every word.

This document also exposes the Bush administration’s rhetorical nonsense about “supporting the troops” by describing how their war plans did anything but. In a section of this briefing paper titled ‘Benefits/Risks,’ the authors wrote, "Even with a legal base and a viable military plan, we would still need to ensure that the benefits of action outweigh the risks. A post-war occupation of Iraq could lead to a protracted and costly nation-building exercise. As already made clear, the U.S. military plans are virtually silent on this point."

Virtually silent. 1,706 American soldiers have been killed in Iraq thanks to the virtual silence of the Bush administration, for a total of 1,891 ‘Coalition’ soldiers dead. Multiply that number by at least ten to count the wounded and maimed. Tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians have been killed and wounded, and the car bombs continue to explode on a daily basis.

The decision to make war at all costs, the decision to lie about the reasons for going to war, the massive trans-Atlantic effort to make an illegal act appear legal, and the astounding fact that more effort went into manufacturing a political pretext for invasion than went into planning for the invasion and aftermath, all of this led us into the horror-show that is this occupation.

The American military has all but conceded the fact that this war is lost. "I think the more accurate way to approach this right now is to concede that this insurgency is not going to be settled, the terrorists and the terrorism in Iraq is not going to be settled, through military options or military operations," Brig. Gen. Donald Alston, chief American military spokesman in Iraq, said last week. "It's going to be settled in the political process." There are no more viable military options. The war is lost. It is going to be settled in the political process.

So be it.

On Thursday, June 16th, Representative John Conyers will hold a hearing to investigate and expose the facts revealed by the release of the Downing Street Minutes and the other documents. A variety of witnesses will be called to describe the contents of these documents, and to describe what has been done to Iraq, and to us all, by this administration.

The Conyers hearing will be held at 1:30pm EST, in the Wasserman Room, in the headquarters of the Democratic National Committee in Washington D.C. Why there, and not in the Rayburn House Office Building, in one of the official House hearing rooms? Because Republican Rep. James Sensenbrenner, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, has forbidden the use of hearing rooms by Democrats for anything other than Republican-sanctioned business. The facts surrounding the Downing Street Minutes will be heard nonetheless, despite this whisper-of-fascism tactic by the Republican majority.

At 5:00pm EST, a rally will take place in Lafayette Park, at the gates of the White House. Rep. Conyers will speak, along with Ambassador Joseph Wilson and Cindy Sheehan, who lost her son Casey in Iraq in May 2003, as Bush was unfurling his ‘Mission Accomplished banner. The hearing and rally have been organized by the After Downing Street coalition, a collection of more than 120 organizations and news outlets which came together for the purpose of nailing the facts of the Downing Street Minutes to the White House door.

That, at the conclusion of the rally on Thursday, is exactly what will happen. Several weeks ago, Rep. Conyers published a letter demanding answers from the Bush administration regarding the Minutes. That letter has been signed by more than one hundred Congresspeople, and by nearly a million American citizens. Rep. Conyers will personally deliver this letter and all those signatures to the White House on Thursday.

Jawaharlal Nehru, who with Mahatma Gandhi successfully freed India from British colonial rule, once said, “A moment comes, which comes but rarely in history, when we step out from the old to the new, when an age ends, and when the sound of a nation, long suppressed, finds utterance.”

Thursday, June 16th, may see such a moment come to pass. It has been a long time coming, and so much remains to be done if the terrible damage of these last years is to be repaired. But a moment is before us. The hard truth is coming to the White House, carried by a tide of outrage and disgust. Our future awaits this moment with bated breath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Didn't we have this same "moment in history" just 30 years ago?
The Viet Nam war was supposed to be the turning point, the dawning of the Age of Aquarius, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Does the Bush Administration sell "indulgences"?
Is there a comparison?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Does a Kenny Lay GetOutofJailFree card count?
I think it's close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. How about Medals of Freedom for the cronies?
Do a bad job, get rewarded, as long as you follow the Bush party line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. The first thought that comes to mind is that Luther left the church
Symbolically it holds up, but I think only in a reaching fashion. Is America ready to leave this administration? We can't make follow up the bold action of 'nailing' the document to the whitehouse doors by leaving the country.

The other thing I keep thinking as I read this is that the act of going to war is a conclusive act based on exhaustion of all other options. What the leaked documents collectively show (not just the original DSM) is that our administration decided to go to war first, then found the reasons to do it. I keep waiting for your text to come out and say that, but it doesn't nail the point home.

A better analogy might be that scientists don't come up with facts to fit a conclusion they have already drawn. They do it the right way, which is the other way around, they draw conclusions from facts.

No one (that should be in power at any rate) decides to go to war and then figures out how to make the people support it. The war against the Taliban was an obvious example of the right way to do it. Iraq was the complete opposite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coventina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. When Luther nailed the theses he didn't want to leave the church
He was only seeking to reform it.

The schism came later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coventina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think the analogy is fine
If they are really going to nail it to the White House, then it is similar to what Martin Luther did.

In both cases the abuses of the institution targeted is the focus of the document, so I think you are on solid ground.

Just my .02
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. Keep Martin Luther
I had 1 change, but reread and it is fine. I am glad you stated why Coyers will hold his hearing at the DNC. I am sooooo pissed. Thanks Will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. The ML lede works
It might not hurt to add the opening statement of the theses later on to tie it in:

"Out of love for the truth and the desire to bring it to light, the following propositions will be discussed at Wittenberg...."

I might even add the Condi Rice and Colin Powell quotes from 2001, or whenever it was, about Saddam being contained and not being a threat and then their about face on it when it was helpful for the casus belli.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. That first line is great
Thanks. I will add it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. you're welcome
Give 'em hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. I would only change one thing...
... to make the follow-through go well. Instead of "its own door," I'd put that public testament where it belongs--on the front door of the White House.

It's also worth mentioning, to reinforce the notion of "high crimes," that what happened in April 2002 was a conspiracy. The leader of our nation and the leader of a foreign nation conspired to invade a third nation without just cause. Under our own law and international law, that is a criminal conspiracy.

Cheers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Who is the Martin Luther surrogate?
Conyers? The British "Deep Throat?" The analogy kind of dangles there.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'm still pissed about the room so nothing is sinking in.
I like the comparison, though
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamstersFromHell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
14. Looks fine to me.
You posting about Martin Luther finally got me to put down something in this reply I've mulled over in my mind for months, but it really never fit anywhere. (And it may not here.)

To draw a silly analogy, every day since January, 2001 Ari Fleischer or Scott McClellan have nailed feces (of the male bovine type) to the White House door and the flies of the MSM have wallowed in it, spreading it to any and all who would be so blind as to swallow it.

Rep. Conyers need not nail his to the door, it's certainly got enough truth in content that it should stick all by itself to the door, and the occupants behind that door. I can only hope those same flies who thrive on the bullshit will spread the truth as diligently.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
16. I remember when I first heard about Luther's protest in HS history
The teacher mentioned the nailing of 95 theses to the door, but I thought he said "95 feces". That was hard to imagine, so it really threw me off for a little while, and unfortunately, it's the first thing I think of whenever I consider Martin Luther. Which says more about my state of mind than anything else, I suppose.

On the other hand, your article is clear and well-put.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yewberry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
17. Some relatively minor stuff
Hey, Will. I hope you'll take these in the spirit intended and not feel that I've picked this apart.

Here goes:

¶2--"the fact that intelligence and facts..."--might want to replace one of the two uses of "fact."
Also "paint a veneer of legitimacy" feels funny to me. I don't know if it's too cliché or if it just takes the analogy too far. Maybe "paints" feels redundant, given the nature of the analogy.


¶6--capitalization of "lie" seems odd.


¶12--abbreviate "representative" to agree with abbreviations throughout other paragraphs.
"...the release of the DSM and the other documents."--You know these documents far better than I; could they be referred to as "supporting documents?" It might help the reader keep on track with which documents you mean.

¶13--the first sentence is very staccato and repeats "in" several times. Unless you want that nodding, staccato effect, you might consider rewording.

¶14--there's some lost emphasis in sentence 2. Maybe include "just," as in, "...Casey in Iraq in April 2003, just as Bush was unfurling..." You might consider giving Cindy Sheehan her own sentence to create more emphasis and keep from letting the sentence wander too far, but it might change the balance of the paragraph if you did.
Close the quotes on "Mission Accomplished."
Should "coalition" be capitalized? (I honestly don't know.)

¶17--final sentence analogy does not work for me. "Future" is personalized as having "bated breath." This strikes me as the weakest of the piece.

Good job. Hope this helps!
Rachel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Damn...someone stole my nitpicks...
Edited on Tue Jun-14-05 05:32 PM by VelmaD
I think the Luther analogy holds up fine. I don't know what else to say...I wish I could be there in person to see this and I really hope you're right about this being a moment in history.

I'll try to give it one more hard read through later tonight and I'll let you know if I spot anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
20. A few more things
Edited on Tue Jun-14-05 06:32 PM by VelmaD
paragraph 1 "once nailed to its own door"...is a little clunky

Paragraph 5 "One document, a briefing paper partnered with the Downing Street Minutes, states bluntly that British officials knew an invasion would be illegal, but had no choice but to figure out a way to frame it as legal..."...the last two clauses in this don't flow well

paragraph 15 - consider Members of Congress instead of Congresspeople
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
21. Nail It to the White House Door.
I like the title the most. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
22. As much as I appreciate the analogy, and as much as I enjoy your ...
.... first sentence and paragraph, I request that you not use a religious reference of any form to the actions that will transpire on the 16th.

We need to return to the roots of the American enlightenment species -- a firm, resolute, explicit separation of Church and State. Beginning with a religious analogy is simply not, imho, an appropriate way to begin what is an otherwise powerful essay.

I suggest you begin with the Nehru quote cited in your next to last paragraph. On Thursday, we intend to step out of the age of the neoconster, the ruthless, imperialistic and illegal behavior of an illegitimate government and enter an age when "We The People" OPEN the door to our house, open all the windows, and begin disinfecting and flushing the vermin that has infested it since Jan 2001.

Peace.

www.missionnotaccomplished.us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
23. Glorious. Your Invocation Of Martin Luther Works. IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pobeka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
24. Glad you nailed the real issue, the lie is about claming to want peace.
I have worried the GOP spin machine will say "of course we were planning a war, that's only prudent even if it is a last resort".

You appropriately called it with this:

"... Bush and his people, who spent those months before the attack preaching peace and international cooperation while sharpening their knives behind closed doors."

I like it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC