Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How can someone without a law license be appointed to the courts?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 02:29 PM
Original message
How can someone without a law license be appointed to the courts?
Randi said one of Bush's judges was confirmed today, and the reason he was blocked earlier was because he refused to apply for a law license.

What the fuck is going on here?


Anyone else hear about this???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MichiDem Donating Member (135 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. I've heard
that you don't need to be a lawyer to be a judge.

Not sure it's true though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The president can appoint whomever he wants
thats why Congress is supposed to 'advise and consent' - to prevent unqualified people from getting lifetime appointments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Not certain...
about today - but it used to be in Texas that you needn't be a lawyer to be a judge. It surprised me at the time...except when you think of it in terms of 'political paybacks'...which I guess most of 'em were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiDem Donating Member (135 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I was thinking along the terms of
elected judges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. Here's some more info...
The Constitution doesn't require that Supreme Court justices be attorneys, but it's always been assumed that only a lawyer should be nominated. No President has ever nominated a non-lawyer. Young people are also not appointed to the Supreme Court. Most justices leave the Supreme Court through death or becoming too ill to continue serving. Some justices can be lured off the bench by offers of ambassadorships, and only one justice (Samuel Chase in 1803) has ever been impeached (and later acquitted in 1805). Efforts were made to impeach William Douglas in 1969 for his strong liberalism and Abe Fortas the same year for conflict of interest, but both attempts failed. Impeachment of a justice is the same as for any other federal official - for treason, bribery, or any high crimes and misdemeanors (Article 2, Section 4).

http://faculty.ncwc.edu/toconnor/410/supremecourt.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. There is no requirement for legal experience
Strange but true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. He didn't try to pass the bar in his home state because
Edited on Wed Jun-15-05 02:59 PM by ArkDem
he practiced law in DC. The argument was that he needed to pass the bar in both places.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Umm, He Was a Lawer For BYU (In Utah) And He LOST His DC License Too!
"Griffith said he did not have a Utah law license because he never thought he needed it for his job as lawyer for Brigham Young University. He also took the blame for losing his D.C. law license by not paying bar association dues. He got the license back by paying what he owed."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patcox2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. On that basis, I've "lost" my license, too.
Edited on Wed Jun-15-05 04:19 PM by patcox2
Its nit-picking. You do not need a license to be in-house counsel in many jurisdictions because you are not retailing your services to the public, that would explain the situation in Utah. As far as "losing" your license for failure to pay the annual fees, I have had my license suspended for failing to pay the annual fee, because I was not practicing at the time; it was reinstated upon payment.

I am in-house right now. I don't need to stay admitted, I do so out of choice. So it matters not a whoop that I was administratively suspended.

I could well imagine that if I moved to take a job as an in-house in
another state, I would not bother to get admitted there, because I am too old for that bar exam shit all over again. And I probably wouldn't bother keeping up my current license (actually, I am not sure I could because you have to have a bona-fide office in state). So I could easily see myself in that situation.

I hope you all don't block my nomination to the bench over it, someday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I had a good friend years ago whose dad was a judge
Edited on Wed Jun-15-05 04:58 PM by proud2Blib
He was a retired cop. He never even went to college, not to mention law school.

Vern Miller, the state atty general in KS back in the 70s (he was the moron who charged airline employees with violating state liquor laws for serving alcohol without a liquor license while flying over KS) had no law degree and had never taken the bar exam. Miller was also in law enforcement before being elected atty general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Well Goody For You! He Still "Took Blame For It"
So, whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SW FL Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Same here
I passed two bar exams, when I moved, I let one lapse but I keep the other active just in case I ever need it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philosophie_en_rose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. Anyone can be appointed to the courts.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. Maybe it is like the pope. You don't have to be in the clergy to make
pope. I think!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WePurrsevere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. That's right...
When they were voting for a new pope I had this discussion with my Roman Catholic parents... I believe the requirements for a candidate must be a baptized Roman Catholic single (although that was not always true) male (although some believe in 800 something AD there was a female pope "Joan" for a few years) in good standing with the church.

Since being a judge is a "no experience or training necessary" type of career this means is that given the right time, place and proper schmoozing anyone can be appointed or voted in as a Judge. Hmm... I could handle that gig... I'd do really well as a *sitting* judge. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kraklen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
12. Makes sense.
The courts appointed somebody without any moral license to be president to that office, he can appoint somebody without any legal license to be on the court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
17. I see the question was
already answered correctly. As a side note, in NYS, one does not have to be an attorney to be elected and serve as a Justice of the Peace. These non-attorneys can hear small claims court; violations and misdemeanors; and arraign people on felony charges. They can not hear a felony case.

I'm not sure it is a particularly good thing to have non-attorneys serve even in this limited role. While a few are as good as any of the local judges, the majority are untalented men and women who hand out injustice too frequently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC