Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Matt PUDGE Doing What He Does Best: Sliming the MJ Victim

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 03:32 PM
Original message
Matt PUDGE Doing What He Does Best: Sliming the MJ Victim
I won't link to the scumbag. He had pics of the victim, supposedly the day after the verdict, playing with a football, sitting on a ledge talking to a girl, and other such activities while the PUDGE angle is to contrast the D.A.'s words that he was having a hard time.

Meanwhile, the SHIAVO autopsy results are buried in a routine headline below, the surprise being that he's including it at all.

Hey, PUDGE, no pin-ups of Prince William lately?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ignore him.
I'll never understand why people get worked up about Drudge. The guy's a moron and a Republican shill. Ignore him.

If you're looking for Schiavo autopsy result info, go to any major news org's site. It's everywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UdoKier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. Actually, it's the MJ ACCUSER.
MJ was was found not guilty of all charges.

Although I agree it's totally inappropriate to show pics of an underage KID, esp. since he was probably put up to all this by an opportunistic mom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Thank you, that is an important distinction,
One that some people are unable, or unwilling to make. But it is the reality of the matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. If he's not Jacko's victim, he sure is his mother's victim
Whatever happened to this kid, I feel sorry for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. To #s 2&5: The Accuser IS mj's Victim. Thank You. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. no no UTUSN, mj is the victim, git with the program
the rock star millionaire junkie is the real victim here, not some little hustler kid. (sarcasm overdose)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Thanks, mopaul, for Your Own Many, Legendary Threads
that drip intelligence and conviction. You are a pillar here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Can you prove that?
If you can, beyond a reasonable doubt, then there is a job waiting for you as a prosecuting attorney in Santa Maria. If not, then you are merely engaging in specualtion, gossip and innuendo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I Am Not a Lawyer and Am Not in a Court. I don't Have to Do "Reasonable".
The legal game is its own thing. That the prosecuter could not do his job well enough, or was out-gunned, or was dealt the cards of a wacko witness AND a wacko JURY has nothing to do with the REALITY. Neither does the perpetrator's having been beaten by his father when he was a kid or his boo-hoo isolation. And pursuing kids, sleeping with them, and paying them off has nothing to do with gossip and innuendo. The man in the mirror knows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Well, actually yes, you do have to do reasonable friend
Otherwise what you are engaging in is gossip and innuendo. You are stating what is your own opinion as a fact, when it is truly unknown at best, and false at worst. If you engage too openly in such gossip and innuendo, you can be legally sued for slander and libel. After all, this is the land of innocent until proven guilty. Jackson was given a not guilty verdict, thus the presumption has to be his innocence.

As far as the "wacko" jury, what else can you possbily expect from them? This wasn't a case about whether or not Jackson is out there, we know that he is. The case was about molesting a young boy, and it had to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Well, beyond a reasonable doubt got thrown out the window when it was shown that the mother was a shake down artist, and the alleged victim kept changing his story. The prosecutor also performed badly by grandstanding about all of these previous boys Jackson had allegedly molested, and then was caught flat footed when the defense trotted in those very same boys, all grown up, to testify under oath that Jackson hadn't molested them. It was a poorly put on case, and the verdict was inevitable, it had to be not guilty.

Now if you wish to speculate, or opine about such matters, fine, that is your right. However, both morally and legally, stating matters that concern somebody else as a fact, rather than your opinion is poor form. Legally, Jackson is now presumed innocent, and that is the fact. Everything else is opinion. The man in the mirror very well may know, but neither you, nor I, nor anyone else does. Thus, all you can speak to is your own opinion, but not the facts of the matter. It is an important distinction in our country, one I suggest that you observe. You never know, you too could fall on the wrong side of it someday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. By the Way, "Gossip" Has Nothing to Do with Your Implied "Untruth"
Edited on Thu Jun-16-05 10:31 AM by UTUSN
As I posted a jillion times back when Kitty KELLEY was frequently dismissed as a "gossip", the dictionary definition is replete with words like "intimate," "report," "facts," "personal," and "sensational"---and nary the word "untruth". That said, the REASONS I gave in my previous post are not gossip. Neither are the SPECULATION?(Ha!) of specialists who chart the patterns of pedophiles. That said, your opinions and mine don't have to satisfy one another. Guess what, I also believe O.J. did the deed and that the Shrubbites stole BOTH '00 AND '04, and that Shrub invaded Iraq to get out of his father's shadow and to wreak vengeance for his wimpy father---and I don't have to prove it.

*******QUOTE*******

http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=gossip&x=19&y=17

Main Entry: 1gos·sip
Pronunciation: 'gä-s&p
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English gossib, from Old English godsibb, from god god + sibb kinsman, from sibb related -- more at SIB
1 a dialect British : GODPARENT b : COMPANION, CRONY c : a person who habitually reveals personal or sensational facts about others
2 a : rumor or report of an intimate nature b : a chatty talk c : the subject matter of gossip


********UNQUOTE*******
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. 2nd By-the-Way, I Was Posting about PUDGE, Not a MJ Thread
For anybody's information, I have Alerted every single MJ thread, every single Runaway Bride thread, and various varieties of Vanity threads --to increasingly small results, I might add. I did not intend to start a MJ discussion here. My interest is in slamming wingnut A-holes like PUDGE. Notice that SHIAVO is NOT on my list of Alerts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. *Sigh*
Your original statement was that "The Accuser IS mj's Victim. Thank You." Do you have any proof of this? Not the alleged victim's words, or that of his mother's, for they have both been discredited in a court of law. I'm asking for real live proof here, eye witness testimony, some evidence, anything.

If you don't, the you are, by default, engaging in gossip. I'm not stating anything, nor implying anything about untruths etc. etc(where did that come from?). I am simply stating that you are engaging in gossip and rumor-mongering. Your own definition that you posted backs this up. Now then, you are free to post your own OPINION on the matter, but when you are stating that your opinion is fact, as you did in your OP, then you are opening yourself up to charges of slander and libel. Plain and simple.

Now then, before you go sinking even further into the deep end, don't start making assumptions about my opinions on various matters like OJ, MJ, and Bushco. You know what they say about ass-u-me don't you?

Cheers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paula777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. Nicely said
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. He's a kid! What is he suposed to do? That is wrong, now that
Mother should go after Matt D......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
14. Anyone who TiVoed or Taped the Bashir documentary has the pic
The kid is well-known.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Double Sigh. The Point Was Never the I.D. Picture
It was Matt PUDGE's scumminess in being snarky about displaying pictures of the VICTIM apparently NOT being "devastated" as the D.A. said he was after the outcome. Supposedly handling a football and sitting talking means he is NOT DEVASTATED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC