Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

the media is no longer just negligent . . . it's downright criminal! . . .

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 06:11 PM
Original message
the media is no longer just negligent . . . it's downright criminal! . . .
after watching the Conyers hearings all afternoon, I did something I haven't done in years -- I watched the network news . . . Conyers had thanked the media for attending, and I wanted to see what kind of coverage they'd give the hearings . . .

channel-surfing all three networks reminded me vividely why I no longer watch these whores . . . CBS Evening News? . . . not one word . . . NBC Nightly News? . . . ditto . . . ABC World News Tonight? . . . zip . . .

here we have fully a quarter of the U.S. House of Representatives signing a letter to Bush about the DSM and delivering a petition with over a half million signatures to the White House . . . and not one lousy stinkin' word from any of the "Big Three" . . . it's absolutely disgusting . . . they're part of a huge coverup of administration crimes and are consciously preventing the American people from learning the truth about Iraq . . .

this kind of behavior is more than negligent . . . it's downright criminal . . . and I won't be making the mistake of tuning in the network nightly news ever again . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. The media past "criminal" a long
time ago!

They are what we need to march on!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. the CIA infested media companies "sold us out".... we have no idea
of what the truth is anymore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. trhe media is us now
the hearings will get top billing on AAR today, locally Randi is on the drive home
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. YUP. and if we REVOLT, who will see it???!!!!!
I feel so helpless!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. That's why DU says ..
THE REVOLUTION WILL NOT BE TELEVISED~ (IT'S ONLINE.)

FIGHT THE BUSH JUNTA AT @ DEMOCRATICUNDERGROUND.COM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
linazelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's not about watching them...at this point, you (and I) have to
contact them--regardless of how they react. This is too important to just turn off the TV. That won't do a thing. Write a letter and let them know how you feel!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stubtoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. And when you do contact them
If they have reported on DSM or the hearings, thank them. And then request they get to the bottom of this and do some analysis on the contents of the documents.

We can't let them stop at reportage, they need to do some digging.

Keep them cards and emails comin', folks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. If Tom Cruise had watched the hearings the MSM
would cover it for sure...

I mean, they'd do a story on him watching the TV, but they wouldn't mention what he was watching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. Media consolidation went a long way toward this!
No competition equals no news. It has went from racing to be first to not wanting to be first with a big story. It is costing these people money to run Fox and CNN and the others. I mean real money, advertising time to reach 200K people can't sell for much. It is kind of funny, I listen to the new sponsors AAR is finding and it is mute testimony to the size of the audience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. The media IS the enemy! Busting up the complicit corporate whore media
is JOB ONE.

Randomly auditing all elections with voter verified paper ballots is JOB TWO.

JOB THREE doesn't really matter until job one and two are completed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FearofFutility Donating Member (764 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'm beyond disgusted....
I've been out all day and was really looking forward to SOME type of coverage of the hearings and rally. Just a brief mention would do. There has been NOTHING.......Sickening....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brettdale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. its awful
I cant beleive they didnt even mention it, I thought they would whore it up for Bush and try to blame someone else, but NOT TO EVEN MENTION IT GOES BEYOND BELIEF, THE MEDIA IS GETTING WORSE NOT BETTER, BUSH NOW HAS NO ONE HE HAS ANSWER TO, WELCOME TO IRAN GUYS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. and to make it worse,
as a poster in another thread has posted, the mediwhores today asked scottie the wonder press secretary, not about the memo, but about whether the white house was going to respond to conyers and his hearing????

can you imagine that!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphire Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. It didn't happen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphire Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
14. Mainstream media cover-up - from Media Matters
Mainstream media cover-up: In five weeks following its disclosure, Downing Street memo drew little attention

In the five weeks following its disclosure, both newspapers and the broadcast media in the United States largely ignored the Downing Street memo, a secret British intelligence document indicating that British intelligence officials believed the Bush administration manipulated intelligence to support its case for war in Iraq.

A Media Matters for America search of Nexis databases following the memo's disclosure on May 1 in the British Sunday Times revealed that U.S. newspapers published only 10 articles by their own reporters focused on the substance of the memo prior to a June 7 press conference at which a reporter asked President Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair about it. In addition, a Knight Ridder story dated May 6 was reprinted or excerpted in several newspapers. Of these reports, only a handful included new information or original reporting. On television, the memo was the subject of only two reports on prime-time cable news programs prior to the press conference; among the three major networks' evening news shows, only NBC's Nightly News had devoted a report solely to the memo as of June 14, and even that occurred after the press conference.

Newspapers slow to respond to Downing Street memo story

In the weeks following the disclosure of the Downing Street memo, U.S. newspapers offered little coverage of its content. Stories that were published included very little, if any, original information about the memo, preferring to restate facts that had been available since the Sunday Times' initial story.

<snip>

Television coverage also lacking

Coverage of the Downing Street memo on prime-time network and cable news programs has been even more limited. No channel aired a prime-time report on the memo until more than two weeks after its May 1 publication. Besides the initial mention of the memo by Fox News host Alan Colmes on the May 11 edition of Hannity & Colmes, initial reports on CNN's Wolf Blitzer Reports and MSNBC's Countdown with Keith Olbermann on May 16, and a panel discussion on the June 6 edition of Fox News' Special Report with Brit Hume, the memo did not receive significant prime-time coverage until after Bush and Blair were asked about it at a June 7 press conference.

Continued @ http://mediamatters.org/items/200506160002



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
16. I agree. The CM is complicit in betrayal of our Constitution, our people.
Face it,...corporate media has betrayed its duty to serve the people by informing our people of THE FACTS which impact all of us.

CM is as guilty of "high crimes and misdemeanors" as the predators who have exploited our trust and honor.

The corporate media will NEVER gain my trust because they have betrayed me and my friends and family and people. That mark is forever. They have a LOT to PROVE for a LONG TIME before they can EARN my trust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC