Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Covering Hearing on Countdown now!!! n/t

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 07:09 PM
Original message
Covering Hearing on Countdown now!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Vendehei from the Washington Post said nothing is damning in
the memo. Screw Memo! They are actual minutes!!!!!

He is talking about anti-war Liberals holding a mock hearing.

I wonder why Keith isn't on tonight????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. He's supposed to be a REPORTER not an opinionator.
This is gonna be a battle folks. WashPost and NYT are going to try to dump on KnightRidder and its papers.

Post missed the story...no....they're working to cover it up for BushInc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wasn't that awful
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wookie294 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Apparently, the Washington Post didn't see this
Paragraph 28: “Of itself, REGIME CHANGE has no basis in international law.”

Paragraph 28: “there is no recent evidence of Iraq complicity with international terrorism."

Paragraph 29: "There is therefore no justification for action against Iraq based on action in self-defense (Article 51) to combat imminent threats of terrorism as in Afghanistan.”

Paragraph 32: Invasion of Iraq would be legal if -- “Iraq was in breach of its obligations regarding WMD, and ballistic missiles. Such proof would need to be incontrovertible and of large-scale activity. Current intelligence is insufficiently robust to meet this criterion.”

And let's not forget about the intelligence being "FIXED."

Hello??? Mr. Washington Post??? Ya there??

http://rawstory.com/aexternal/pdfstemp/ods020308.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. Must have missed it.
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC