BamaLefty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-16-05 09:00 PM
Original message |
| Gitmo Prisoners Haven't Been Tried Yet, Correct? |
|
Yes or no will suffice.
I believe it is no... right?
|
| stillcool
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-16-05 09:03 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. They have had tribunals.... n/t |
| gumby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-16-05 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 4. Can you document that? |
|
Not being confrontational. I think this topic is a good question.
|
| stillcool
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-16-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| gumby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-16-05 09:03 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. They haven't even been CHARGED |
|
with a crime. So, how could they be tried?
|
| stillcool
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-16-05 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 6. The tribunals were to determine if.... |
|
a person met whatever requirements were established to be classified as a 'legal combatant', which I think is a term they manufactured. When the FOIA documents came out I reviewed one case. Whatever evidence that led the tribunal to determine the mans status was 'classified'. There was zero un-classified information to warrant his imprisonment. It appears that if you were anywhere around the Middle-East after 9/11 you would have a shot at a one way ticket to Gitmo.
|
| SouthernDem2004
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-16-05 09:05 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. They were never arrested. They were captured in another country. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:26 AM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
