Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DeLay owns ExxonMobil stock worth >$50,000

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 10:33 AM
Original message
DeLay owns ExxonMobil stock worth >$50,000
ETHICS -- DELAY'S 50K+ STAKE IN EXXON: As majority leader, Rep. Tom DeLay has been pushing aggressively to shield manufacturers of the fuel additive MTBE like Exxon from lawsuits related to groundwater contamination. If he's successful, DeLay is likely to personally profit. Newsday reports, "Tom DeLay owns stock worth more than $50,000 in ExxonMobil." Jeffrey Stonecash, a political scientist at the Maxwell School of Syracuse University said, "It looks like a serious conflict of interest. I think the issue of owning the stock and then promoting it just doesn't look good." DeLay spokesman Dan Allen said there was no problem because "everyone knows Congressman Tom DeLay bases his votes on the merits of legislation before him and only the merits of the legislation."

=======================================================

http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/ny-usmtbe174307744jun17,0,328974.story?coll=ny-nationalnews-headlines

A possible conflict for DeLay?

BY J. JIONI PALMER
WASHINGTON BUREAU

June 17, 2005

WASHINGTON -- House Majority Leader Tom DeLay owns stock worth more than $50,000 in ExxonMobil, according to financial disclosure reports, while at the same time he is one of the driving forces behind legislation that would shield that company and other manufacturers of the gasoline additive MTBE from lawsuits that could cost them millions. Already under fire for alleged ethical lapses, DeLay, a Texas Republican, has hired the Houston law firm Bracewell and Giuliani to defend against those charges. But the firm, in which former New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani is a partner, also represents a host of MTBE manufacturers in court and in Congress. The use of the additive has been a key issue in the Northeast, where areas, including Long Island, have been dealing with the chemical tainting water supplies.

While not prohibited by ethics rules, the potential conflicts are a matter of debate."It looks like a serious conflict of interest," said Jeffrey Stonecash, a political scientist at the Maxwell School of Syracuse University. "I think the issue of owning the stock and then promoting it just doesn't look good." DeLay's stake in ExxonMobil, which is held jointly with his wife and is valued between $50,000 and $100,000, as well as his legal bills, ranging from $125,000 to $315,000, were revealed in annual disclosure statements lawmakers are required to file and were released this week. He also earned between $1,000 and $2,500 in stock dividends, which were reinvested, according to the documents.

Dan Allen, DeLay's spokesman, scoffed at the suggestion the second highest-ranking House Republican has done anything untoward. "First of all, everyone knows Congressman Tom DeLay bases his votes on the merits of legislation before him and only the merits of the legislation," Allen said. As for the law firm, Allen said, they did represent him against ethics charges lodged by "partisan Democrats and backed up by partisan Democratic groups that have been launching a barrage of attacks against House Republicans, including Tom DeLay." The House ethics code does not require that members abstain from legislation that could benefit a business they have a financial stake in; there is language barring compensation from any source by "virtue of influence improperly exerted" as a result of serving in Congress.

Hofstra University law professor Eric Freedman said he doesn't think DeLay did anything wrong. Freedman said it would be unfair to expect members of Congress, who by virtue of their role as federal legislators deal with almost every aspect of national life, not to have any financial holdings. He said what matters is that full disclosure is made. "The fact that this is public is good news; to that extent the system is working, as it should," he said.

more......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Village Idiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. I had NO IDEA...
"The House ethics code does not require that members abstain from legislation that could benefit a business they have a financial stake in"


Why the FUCK NOT?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC