Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A: "This is old news." Q: "So you admit it!"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
scottxyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 03:53 PM
Original message
A: "This is old news." Q: "So you admit it!"
Every time they say the Downing Street Memo is "old news", the response should be "So you admit it!"

http://www.guardian.co.uk/salon/story/0,14752,1509059,00.html#article_continue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Indeed.
I never got that answer? It's old news that * lied? Oh, ok, I'll move on now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. If it is "old news" that Bush lied, the
media certainly didn't convey that to the public, they kept it to themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. The News Is Old-But The Proof Of It Is Brand New
What makes this news is the actual physical minutes coming to life just a month ago. This is proof, not news, that is the difference....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. If only someone would say it on national TV....*sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theplutsnw Donating Member (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Scott M. all but did
calling Conyers anti-war and what not, doesn't that imply that Bush is pro-war furthering the case for DSM and the lying liar...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Yeah... Wes Clark????????? What's waiting for??? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. cuff'm dano
Edited on Fri Jun-17-05 04:08 PM by bpilgrim
zactly :toast:

cause when that becomes the OFFICIAL 'story' that will be the ONLY alternative.

psst... pass the word ;->

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC