scottxyz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-17-05 03:53 PM
Original message |
A: "This is old news." Q: "So you admit it!" |
|
Every time they say the Downing Street Memo is "old news", the response should be "So you admit it!" http://www.guardian.co.uk/salon/story/0,14752,1509059,00.html#article_continue
|
sabra
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-17-05 03:55 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I never got that answer? It's old news that * lied? Oh, ok, I'll move on now...
|
shraby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-17-05 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. If it is "old news" that Bush lied, the |
|
media certainly didn't convey that to the public, they kept it to themselves.
|
dogday
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-17-05 04:05 PM
Response to Original message |
3. The News Is Old-But The Proof Of It Is Brand New |
|
What makes this news is the actual physical minutes coming to life just a month ago. This is proof, not news, that is the difference....
|
Richard Steele
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-17-05 04:06 PM
Response to Original message |
4. If only someone would say it on national TV....*sigh* |
theplutsnw
(104 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-17-05 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
calling Conyers anti-war and what not, doesn't that imply that Bush is pro-war furthering the case for DSM and the lying liar...
|
Amonester
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-17-05 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. Yeah... Wes Clark????????? What's waiting for??? n/t |
bpilgrim
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-17-05 04:07 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Fri Jun-17-05 04:08 PM by bpilgrim
zactly :toast:
cause when that becomes the OFFICIAL 'story' that will be the ONLY alternative.
psst... pass the word ;->
peace
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:50 AM
Response to Original message |