Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Some Very Useful tools for writing WaPo's Ombudsman and others

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 12:14 AM
Original message
Some Very Useful tools for writing WaPo's Ombudsman and others



First of all, take a deep breath and calm down. A firm, factual and a polite tone go a long way.

It might be good idea to read Dana Milbank's article again. If ever there was a case of biased and sloppy reporting this would be it.

Here is the link:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/16/AR2005061601570.html

After that take a Valium or meditate and wait a few minutes.

The good people at Media Matters for America and FAIR-Fairness and Accuracy and Reporting have just put out some great information that specifically deals with the Washington Post:

For Media Matters--see this link:

http://mediamatters.org/items/200506170006#1



The FAIR info-package is at this link:

http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2556

And this is my own personal letter to Mr. Michael Getler the Washington Post Ombudsman:

E-mail: ombudsman@washpost.com

Washington Post
Ombudsman
Michael Getler

Dear Mr. Getler:

On June 8, Washington Post reporter Dana Milbank referred to media activists as "Wingnuts" for suggesting that the media has not properly held accountable the Bush Administration for possibly deceiving the American people. On June 17, 2005 Mr. Milbank mocked and ridiculed one of the U.S. House of Representatives most distinguished statesman for having the gall to challenge the White House’s line and the Republican Party’s uncompromising control over the investigative responsibilities of Congress.

Now let me say Mr. Getler that if this article was just one of many articles expressing a range of opinions, I would have little complaint. Is it not unseemly Mr. Getler that two of the very few pieces run by one of the world’s leading newspapers about a matter of such grave importance consist of insults, name-calling and personal nastiness? Do facts matter any more sir?

Is it not disconcerting sir, that the whole question of whether or not the Bush Administration deceived the American Congress, media and people on an issue of such grave importance has received so very little attention in the Washington Post?

Am I incorrect if I read between the lines that the general attitude of your newspaper is, “Yah-ya--we know Bush lied. That’s not news.” Well sir, I would suggest that perhaps it might be news to many, many people.

I do hope that the Post will commit itself to a thorough, independent and in-depth investigation of its own on the whole question of the Bush Administrations possible manipulation of intelligence. If it is true Mr. Getler that the White House intentionally misled the nation--should not the Washington Post of all papers be leading the journalistic world in investigating this matter?

Sincerely,

__________________________________________________


A True Voice of Opposition
--A Voice for Working People
--Not the Elite--
http://www.bernie.org

Who is Congressman Bernie Sanders?

Read this article and watch the 3 short video clips:

http://www.davidsirota.com/2005/04/who-is-bernie-sanders.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
libertypirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Dana Milbank is a member of skull and bones....
We don't need these stinking loyalty oath people in possitions to screw the public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. email sent to the Washington Post
Wake up America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesEtoiles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. E-mail addresses for all the editors, here:
Contact them collectively:

abramowitz@washpost.com, deyoungk@washpost.com, hadarm@washpost.com, robertgkaiser@yahoo.com, kingc@washpost.com, leenj@washpost.com, leducd@washpost.com, robertsl@washpost.com, sarasohnj@washpost.com, fedpage@washpost.com, woodwardb@washpost.com, milbankd@washpost.com



Or individually:

Michael Abramowitz: abramowitz@washpost.com
National editor

Karen DeYoung: deyoungk@washpost.com
Associate editor

Mary Hadar: hadarm@washpost.com
Assistant managing editor/front page features

Robert G. Kaiser: robertgkaiser@yahoo.com
Associate Editor

Colbert I. King: kingc@washpost.com
Editorial page deputy editor, columnist

Jeff Leen: leenj@washpost.com
Assistant Managing Editor/Investigations

Daniel LeDuc: leducd@washpost.com
Deputy national editor/out of town reporters

Larry Roberts: robertsl@washpost.com
Investigations editor

Judy Sarasohn: sarasohnj@washpost.com, fedpage@washpost.com
Deputy national editor/federal page

Bob Woodward: woodwardb@washpost.com
Assistant managing editor, reporter

:kick:Dana Milbank: milbankd@washpost.com
National staff writer and biased liar


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WorseBeforeBetter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. No Valium and meditation, but bourbon and a Flexeril...
"How far the once mighty Washington Post has fallen. If Corporate Media wonders why those seeking hard news are turning to the blogosphere, look no further than the Milbank article for the answer(s). Many have suggested that the Washington Post is worthy of fish wrap, but I'll at least give you the Sunday comics. OK, Carolyn Hax and the weekly restaurant review. But note, I'm not purchasing it, nor am I reading it online, so this is one person with a fair amount of disposable income to whom your advertisers are not reaching. One of 560,000+ who signed the DSM petition, a block with significant buying power."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC