Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Undercounting Americans killed in Iraq?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 10:46 AM
Original message
Undercounting Americans killed in Iraq?
On a local radio show in Minnesota, host Nick Coleman had a caller saying that the number of Americans killed in Iraq are being undercounted.

Coleman didn't believe it.

Another caller said this issue is based on a Daily Kos post. I clicked around the Daily Kos and didn't see such a post.

Does anyone know more about this?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DODI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. I saw a post a DU months ago saying that the "Americans Killed"
numbers are for troops killed in action, on the spot. It does not take into account troops who die in transit to medical care, at Walter Reed, Germany, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. If they counted non-combat deaths and deaths of the wounded
who died in hospitals outside Iraq, then how many would it be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. Bogus conspiracy theory
They count everyone who dies from wounds suffered in Iraq. This has been debunked numerous times around here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. You say it has be debunked
but that is not entirely true. The questions remain.
Yes ICC does a great job with the information they can get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. No, it is entirely true.
Several people involved in actually doing independent counting of the deaths have disputed this story repeatedly. Unfortunately, nobody bothers to listen to them and this story keeps getting repeated ad nauseum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Well, I just ain't buyin what the * regime is selling
He is so proud of his little war. :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wookie294 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. No, it's completely NOT true
There have been no independent investigations to debunk it. But thanks for playing. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kittenpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. there is a site that a DUer keeps that has every soldier
who has been killed in Iraq. It shows where they died (some in Germany for instance), when, etc. I have a hard time believing any family members would let it go if their child had been killed and didn't appear on the official list. I'll look for a link to the list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kittenpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
5. here's a link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
6. It has been reported multiple times
that soldiers who die as a result of their wounds, but not on the actual field of battle are not listed as killed-in-action.

If this isn't true, is there a link showing this?

Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kittenpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. look at the link I posted under fatality details.
It shows some of the casualties died in hospitals outside of Iraq. Maybe they aren't listed as 'Killed in Action' (I don't know), but they ARE part of the total # of casualties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Thank you. But that begs these questions.
Edited on Sat Jun-18-05 11:48 AM by longship
I have heard via AAR that the number of soldiers who have died after they were pulled off the battlefield is larger than the number who died on the battlefield--that the number of dead from action in Iraq is over 4,000.

Also, I remember the Pentagon announcing that they will only count soldiers who die on the actual field of battle. Have they announced a change since then and I didn't hear about it on the news?

I'm not trying to dispute your information, I'm just trying to make some sense of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kittenpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. have you looked at the link? It counts people who
died in military hospitals outside of Iraq. Look under fatality details.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Yes, of course I have.
As I said, I'm not disputing your information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kittenpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I misunderstood (misunderestimated?)
what you were asking--about the policy change rather than the stats. I wasn't trying to be snarky!:) I don't know if there has been a policy change in counting troops who die outside of Iraq, but the official numbers coincide with the ones on this site so maybe there has been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. No worries.
I didn't take your response negatively. I thought I might have not been clear. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
10. Well . .
From the November 24, 2004 Stars and Stripes, hardly a bastion of the radical left:

"As of Tuesday, 20,802 troops have been treated at Landstuhl from injuries received in Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom."

http://www.stripesonline.com/article.asp?section=104&article=24783&archive=true


Now go to ICC and you will see there were only about 11-12,000 KIA or wounded in Iraq and maybe 2,000 more in Afghanistan through November 2004.

http://icasualties.org/oif/


Where did the other 6-7,000 come from?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kittenpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. now that's different.
I know they don't count people who suffer from post-traumatic stress & those people could be treated. Also, if wounds are received in a non-combat accident (for instance a guy who lost his legs when a road gave way)... they aren't counted either.
That could account for some of the wounded. Interesting though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC