Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DOWNING STREET DELUSIONS (Questions of authenticity nixed)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 11:49 PM
Original message
DOWNING STREET DELUSIONS (Questions of authenticity nixed)
<<SNIP>>
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2005_06/006537.php

DOWNING STREET DELUSIONS....The wingnuts are getting desperate. Captain's Quarters, in a nostalgic attempt to recreate the glories of Rathergate, suggests that the Downing Street Memos aren't real. Why? Because Michael Smith, the reporter who got hold of them, had them retyped to protect his source and then returned the originals. Jonah Goldberg feverishly calls CQ's revelations a "must read."

Now, unlike the Killian memos that were at the center of Rathergate, there are quite a few principals in this case who either wrote or received these memos and therefore have absolute knowledge of whether or not they're genuine. The first memo, for example, was written by Matthew Rycroft and distributed at the time to David Manning, Geoff Hoon, Jack Straw, Peter Goldsmith, Richard Wilson, John Scarlett, Francis Richards, Richard Dearlove, Jonathan Powell, Sally Morgan, and Alastair Campbell. So far, not a single one of these people has claimed they're fake.

In fact, just the opposite. Here's Tony Blair himself on May 1, the day the first memo was published:

In a Sunday morning television interview, Mr. Blair did not deny that the meeting took place in July 2002, but he recalled that "subsequent to that meeting, we went the United Nations route," seeking a resolution in November 2002, calling on the Iraqi government to disarm.

.....

<</SNIP>>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. You just know we're going to hear the words "hoax" and "Rather" repeated.
Edited on Sun Jun-19-05 11:54 PM by Kerrytravelers
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.
And repeated.

Ad nasuem.

Because, if you say it enough, just the exact number of repeated times, the sheeple will indeed believe...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks for that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HR_Pufnstuf Donating Member (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. Use this.
Edited on Mon Jun-20-05 12:31 AM by HR_Pufnstuf
"And let me remind you that that memorandum was written before we then went to the United Nations." - Tony Blair, 6-8-5

http://www.newshounds.us/2005/06/08/fox_big_story_on_downing_street_memo.php



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickgutierrez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. The "we went to the UN" talking point is a total non-sequitor.
And, in fact, proves the claims of the memo.

The proper response: "Yes, we know. You made up your minds to go to war before you brought it up with the UN. What's the point?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 06:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Especially when the memo says the UN was a way of excusing the war
rather than an attempt to avoid it. The memos spell out that the British government wanted to get a UN resolution for inspectors, thinking that Saddam would refuse, or limit their access, and that would give them an excuse for launching the full scale war - while their 'spikes of activity' had been trying to goad him into military action (and destroying Iraq's ability to resist the inevitable invasion).

Note that Iraq's dossier that they produced when the inspectors went in (Dec 2002), which said "we don't have any WMD", has never been made public. The US and UK just said "it's lying", and proceded with their military buildup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 06:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Use this instead

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
7. Unfortunately once the seeds of doubt are planted
the Bu$hbots will desperately hang onto that doubt for dear life. After a while the uninformed people, who don't pay that much attention to politics, will claim that those memos were fakes has it was the gospel truth.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC