Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US military death count much higher than numbers reported?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
tinfoilinfor2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 08:42 PM
Original message
US military death count much higher than numbers reported?
Listening to AAR today, I heard a report that the military only reports the numbers of soldiers actually killed in action. If a soldier is shot and later dies in the hospital, he is not part of the reported military deaths.
If true, this is outrageous! And if so, what is the official count? These are our soldiers, not an independently run mercenary outfit. And why haven't I heard of this before?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
END_HATRED_NOW Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. you have a link for that yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liam97 Donating Member (406 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. The link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinfoilinfor2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Thank you. That sounds like the numbers they were quoting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Internut Donating Member (436 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
31. Apparently you didn't see Lampley's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinfoilinfor2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. No, heard it on my car radio...
I believe on the Ed Schultz show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. Someone needs to set AAR straight about this
This claim comes from a nazi site that hates everybody. They are holocaust deniers. I won't even link to the site because it's offense to a lot of people here at DU.

It's a complete lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oversea Visitor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Let Cheney or Rumfield do it
OF course they might choose to ignore. Then you know there is a smoke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Fuzzy math...
I'm sure the actual number is WAY higher, not just what Newspeak is giving us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. Watch out for TBR news
Holocaust denial, anti-semitic, etc..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
35. TBR is where this story originated . . .
that site is largely fiction, and you're right . . . it's run (and most of the articles are written) by a Holocaust-denying anti-Semite . . . good place to stay away from, and certainly not a source for good info on anything . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. I would doubt that's true
There is a website that gives the details of all the casualties. If a bunch were missing I would think those families would be speaking up, loudly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
END_HATRED_NOW Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. maybe they are & we just don't hear about it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
END_HATRED_NOW Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. the military hides so much, how can you doubt another cover-up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
END_HATRED_NOW Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. check out what the military really does this is not on the news
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kittenpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
12. I don't think this is true
check out www.icasualties.org It has the troops who have been killed and shows where they died. Many died in military hospitals outside of Iraq. As someone else said, I don't think the families would be quiet if their son/daughter wasn't on the list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
13. Seems like this could be validated.
I'm surprised that the parents/husband/wives of soldiers killed due to war injuries would be demanding that their loved ones be recognized for their sacrafice. Why hasn't a national effort be made to collect and recognize the real loses sustained in this war?

If it is closer to 6,000 than 1,750 I think this is an outrageous thing for this administration to hide from the American people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
China_cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Maybe they think they are.
After all, we're not allowed to see the coffins coming back so that anyone could count them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
END_HATRED_NOW Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. actually even senators aren't even allowed on bases! Nobody is!
They stopped the reporters from war reporting, why would this be strange to believe the military keeps secrets?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
END_HATRED_NOW Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. hiding things from the American public is the military's specialty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. Ya, the military cannot keep its mouth shut very long.
Edited on Mon Jun-20-05 09:35 PM by Massacure
If they do manage to keep it shut, they usually shoot themselves in the foot trying. Roswell is a perfect example. The military needs to keep their balloons with nuclear detonation sensors a secret, and to their horror the cover story, the UFO, becomes just as big of a problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
China_cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
14. I don't know about 9000
but I do know that here in Charleston, the Citadel planted 1834 American flags on their grounds for Memorial Day in honor of the fallen in Iraq. I don't think anyone would even consider the Citadel as being left of Genghis Khan.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
16. No it's not true, and if AAR bothered to check sites such as the ICCC
they'd see a whole bunch of dead soldiers listed as having been wounded in Iraq but died in Germany and Kuwait and the USA etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinfoilinfor2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. I was skeptical because it was the first I'd heard about it...
We at DU are trying very hard to bring to light factual evidence of bush's screwups. Stuff like this, if false, does not help our cause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
END_HATRED_NOW Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. being skeptical is good, but let's check into it B4 assuming anything
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
END_HATRED_NOW Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. why is that site holier than though?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kittenpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. have you looked at it?
it's includes soldiers that died outside of Iraq. The # is the same as the gov't #. Granted, there could be suicides or accidents that may not count, but not to the degree of 9000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
END_HATRED_NOW Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. yes, I've seen it but one thing I know for sure...
there are so many sites and each one has a different number, how can anyone know for sure? The total number of Iraqis is seperated from 25,000 up to 100,000, that's a huge difference! Why should you only say one site is correct?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. It's "thou" and what makes you say it's "holier than"?
All I said was check that site; it shows very clearly troops who were wounded in Iraq, died outside Iraq, and were counted.

I know. I work with the ICCC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sather Gate Donating Member (38 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
25. True casualties including loss of limb
are much higher than generally thought. I have doctor acquaintances who are at Landstuhl, the major receiving hospital in Germany. There are large numbers of severely wounded shipped there. These doctors' estimate is that there are 15 to 20 times the number of severely wounded, per each KIA, due to IEDs, the rebels' preferred weapon. That would translate to 25,000 plus casualties severely maimed and crippled. These are young soldiers missing one or more limbs, often blinded and disfigured. They are as effectively out of action as KIA. The rebels have learned shaped charges, and these charges can easily blow a hole through even an armored HumVee, or Bradley, or if they're lucky, disable an M1A1 Abrams tank. The Sunni center and much of the north can be considered as a minefield.
The rebels also have surface to air missiles, and lots of RPGs. More helicopters and even jet aircraft are being shot down than the military acknowledges.
The reason that the Marines have staged repeated offensives in the far western al Qaim area is to try to interdict the resupply of these weapons from Syria. Too big an area for the spread-out troops to interdict though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. "Casualties" and "deaths" are not the same thing.
And your post is very interesting..."resupply of these weapons from Syria"...your user name is very interesting, too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sather Gate Donating Member (38 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. I agree
casualties and deaths are not the same. The military would group "casualties" as KIA; died from wounds or complications - what we're talking about here; major wounded, incapable of returning to action; and minor wounded; missing in action; and captured. Everybody except the minor wounded is out of action.
My name expresses my ole beloved Alma Mater - the UNIVERSITY - B.A. 1969, Ph.D. 1975 as I've given on another thread where I met a fellow Cal alum who was the Moderator. Beat them Injuns aka Stanford Cardinal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. The US miliary also counts troops who die in Iraq from non-battle
injuries.

There is 1 US soldier listed as MIA.

The military does give 'wounded not ret'd to duty' and 'wounded ret'd to duty' figures, but I doubt those are all-inclusive figures because no individual names are listed, which means no family/friends/fellow soldiers/doctors/nurses/evac teams etc can say hey so & so is missing off the list.

Unfortunately the military is so desperate for warm bodies that even some seriously woundeds have been/are being returned to duty. And that is one serious FUBAR and tragedy.

***

Great play on words re your name. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bravo411 Donating Member (263 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
29. Reganomics at work
Regan brought the unemployment rate down in a very short time. Just how did he do it? Well, once your unemployment benefits ran out, you were no longer counted in the unemployment figures.

It wouldn't surprise me in the least if they are only counting those that were killed in combat on the ground. If you died on the transport to Germany, or in the hospital, they don't count it as part of their official count.

I've seen the TBRNews site, and looked at their links, which gave me pause. A lot of their stories are from other sources and I haven't crossed checked them to see if they altered them or not, but their original stuff I have to question.

But that doesn't mean that the official count hasn't been dimmed down one way or another. I'm sure the real count is much higher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
32. What I've heard (here) is slightly different
and I can't confirm it. The numbers do not include soldiers that died in hospitals after they were evacuated from Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Internut Donating Member (436 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. These soldiers all died in hospitals in Germany and the US:
Edited on Mon Jun-20-05 10:32 PM by Internut
and are all included in the totals:

Washington, Bennie J.
Frist, Luke P.
Jones, Michael D.
Garceau, Seth K.
Sutphin, Ernest Harold
Matthews, Clint Richard "Bones"
Vega, Michael W.
LaWare, Casey M.
Dickens, Tyler J.
Fox, Bradley C.
Dunham, Jason L.
Jenkins, Troy David
Little, Tommy S.
Holmes, James J.
Bordelon, Michael J.
Schmidt III, John T.
Chaney, William D.
Seesan, Aaron N.
Collins, Randy D.
Lambert, Jonathan W.
Bolding, Todd J.
Mendoza, Antonio
Mattek Jr., John J.
Latham, William T.
Martin, Stephen G.
Coons, James Curtis
McKinley, Robert L.
Neusche, Joshua M.
Mardis Jr., Paul C.
Engel, Mark E.
McCune, Donald R.
Colunga, Zeferino E.
Houghton, Andrew R.
Kirchhoff, David M.
Ivory, Craig S.
Thompson, Jarrett B.
Pinkston, Foster
Adams, Brandon E.
Prewitt, Tyler D.
Nolan, Allen
Ramos, Tamarra J.
Pettaway Jr., James L.
Baker, Ronald W.
Gadsden, Jonathan E.
Fisher, Paul F.
McVey, Otie Joseph
Jimenez, Linda C.
Downey, Michael A.
Tyrrell, Scott Matthew
Welke, Joseph T.
Heredia, Joseph J.
Edinger, Benjamin C.
Nolte, Nicholas S.
Smith, Michael A.
Pena, Javier Obleas-Prado
Young, Ryan C.
Renehan, Kyle J.
Nelson, Craig L.

(names taken from icasualties.org)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfrrfrrfr Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. This rumor is untrue and has to be stopped.
Its bad and makes us look like the boy who cried wolf.


For the morbid amongst you.

http://icasualties.org/oif /

Complete listing of iraqi casualties to date.

And the debunking of this stupid idiotic rumor at
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/6/20/24437/8204
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/5/19/13126/2340

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC