Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

They Died So Republicans Could Take the Senate -by thom hartmann

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 01:19 AM
Original message
They Died So Republicans Could Take the Senate -by thom hartmann
Published on Monday, June 20, 2005 by CommonDreams.org
They Died So Republicans Could Take the Senate
by Thom Hartmann

Richard Nixon authorized the Watergate burglary and subsequent cover-up to advance his own political ambitions. Because Nixon's lies were done for the craven purpose of getting and holding political power, his lies - in the minds of the majority of the members of Congress - were elevated to the level of impeachable "high crimes and misdemeanors."
Bill Clinton had sex in the White House with Monica Lewinsky, but Congress concluded he'd lied about it to maintain political power. Another impeachable crime.

The real scandal of the Downing Street Memos, with the greatest potential to leave the Bush presidency in permanent disgrace, is their implication that lies may have been put forward to help Bush, Republicans, and Blair politically. If Bush lied to gain and keep political power, precedent suggests he and his collaborators in the administration may even be vulnerable to impeachment.

Conservatives say the Bush claims of WMD and "mushroom clouds" were a "lie of ignorance." Condoleezza Rice periodically does the talk-show circuit and repeats the "lie of ignorance" myth. "The entire world thought Saddam had WMD," she and other Bush representatives suggest over and over again. "We had bad intelligence."

more;
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0620-22.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Stunning read. nominated. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. Thom Hartmann is one of my favorites! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zinfandel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Thom Hartmann has absolutely the best radio talk show, weekday mornings.
Edited on Tue Jun-21-05 01:46 AM by Zinfandel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I listen to the replay at night and on weekends via radiopower.org
I love how he disarms wingers and the debates with the Ayn Rand nut. I also like Jim Hightower and the news bulletins.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 03:15 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. they dropped him here as of today
for Al franken - I prefer thom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 03:23 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Frankly,
:D

Thom is my favorite, but sometimes I like to hear Malloy rant. :)

I noticed that Randi and Al are on radiopower tonight instead of Thom. What's up with that? :(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. Not only is he right, but he writes beautifully.
And that ain't easy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 01:52 AM
Response to Original message
6. excellent. Recommended, bookmarked and kicked! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. nominated
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 03:14 AM
Response to Original message
8. bumping for the morning crowd
hartmann is my fav writer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 03:37 AM
Response to Original message
11. Great Read-Wow! I never thought of this reason for Bush's lies! But it is
a very likely and excellent hypothesis about why Bush lied and went to War on Iraq....it was to take control of the Senate and solidify power and everything else then followed for them to reap....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burried News Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 05:29 AM
Response to Original message
12. And this is why they will fight to the death
"When Americans - and the US media - finally realize that Bush's lie was just to get "political capital," to increase the "discretionary power of the President" so he could undo Roosevelt's New Deal and seal power across all three branches of government for his Party, they will turn on him and his Republican co-conspirators.

If it comes out in the open before the election of 2006, Republicans could even lose the House and the Senate, which would virtually guarantee investigations of the many other crimes of the Bush administration. (For example, "bribery" is one of two crimes cited in the Constitution as grounds for impeachment - and the Big Pharma/Medicaid and Big Tobacco/lawsuit settlement cases may qualify.)"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 05:54 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. The Case for Impeachment is building.
I still believe that what is needed is conclusive proof and so far that is not available. Although circumstantial evidence is mounting the RW dominated House will not move on it unless solid proof is at hand. I feel that the CIA &/or the Pentagon has docs that would provide the proof needed. Now I am hoping that the rank and file will leak it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
batsauce Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
14. Just curious
how much was congress even involved in Nixon's downfall?

It seems to me that it was a battle between Nixon and the media, and Nixon was finally "hoisted on his own petard." The ugly little unshaven man lost to the noble MSM, not because the MSM was smart or noble, but Nixon had generated some passionate enemies within his own empire.

Did Congress ever enumerate any charges against him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
15. It was a war to knock out Max Cleland
Like Bush chief of staff Andy Card said:" you don't launch a product in the summer" or something like that. They didn't really crank up the integrated media/WH propaganda campaign until after Labor Day 2002, so it was in full war mode before the November 2002 election. Disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
16. "I'm going to get everything passed that I want to get passed "
'If I have a chance to invade, if I had that much capital, I'm not going to waste it. I'm going to get everything passed that I want to get passed and I'm going to have a successful presidency."
G W Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
17. ......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC