If the US MSM had done their jobs in 2002, we wouldn't need any DSM.

[tuvor]

These three UK stories were written well before bush's War began. If they don't stink of fact-fixing to you, you must have been working for an American corporate media organization.

WHY THE CIA THINKS BUSH IS WRONG
The president says the US has to act now against Iraq. The trouble is, his own security services don't agree.
13 October 2002
http://www.sundayherald.com/28384

CIA IN BLOW TO BUSH ATTACK PLANS
The letter also comes at a time when the CIA is competing with the more hawkish Pentagon, which is also supplying the White House with intelligence on the Iraqi threat.
October 10, 2002
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,808970,00.html

WHITE HOUSE 'EXAGGERATING IRAQI THREAT'
Bush's televised address attacked by US intelligence
October 9, 2002
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,807286,00.html

[mopaul]

1. to we here it IS old news

and that's the lame ass excuse they've given, 'it's old news' as if that lessens the sting of it.

we here were never ever fooled by the cheap lies, and we are in shock and awe that so many were. but i suspect that most of them didn't really believe it themselves, which is even worse than ignorance. that's complicity.

[Skittles]

2. we are proud members of the ten percenters

YES INDEED